grand jury

Pirro’s Office Fails Three Times to Indict Alleged FBI Agent Attacker

The US attorney’s office in Washington, D.C., faces challenges in securing grand jury indictments, as evidenced by a recent case where a grand jury voted “no” three times on a felony assault charge. The case involved an incident with an FBI agent and an immigration officer. The grand jury’s repeated rejection of the indictment comes amid increased scrutiny of the office’s crackdown on crime and aggressive charging practices, particularly regarding assaults on police. Ultimately, the accused will face misdemeanor charges instead of a felony.

Read More

Third Grand Jury Refuses to Indict DC Woman in ICE Arrest Assault Case

Following three failed attempts to secure an indictment, the U.S. Attorney’s office will proceed with a misdemeanor charge against Sidney Reid. The grand juries’ repeated refusals to indict, known as “no true bill,” is rare and may indicate that evidence would not hold up at trial. Reid was arrested for allegedly assaulting an FBI agent during an incident outside the D.C. Jail. Reid’s attorneys believe that the charges stem from officers’ desire to avoid being filmed.

Read More

Judge Denies DOJ Request for Epstein Grand Jury Records: Political Theater Alleged

The judge’s decision to deny the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) request to unseal Jeffrey Epstein’s records from the criminal case has ignited a flurry of opinions and accusations. It seems like the court is sticking to the rules, as the nature of the records in question – grand jury testimony and exhibits – carries significant legal restrictions on their release. Many observers believe the DOJ’s request was more about public optics than a genuine pursuit of justice. It was designed to create a narrative of thwarted transparency and shift blame to the judiciary.

The legal framework surrounding grand jury information is remarkably strict, making its public disclosure exceptionally rare.… Continue reading

Buffalo Shooter Challenges Charges, Citing Lack of Minority Representation on Grand Jury

Attorneys representing Payton Gendron, the perpetrator of the Buffalo supermarket shooting, have moved to dismiss the federal charges against him, citing a lack of minority representation on the grand jury. They claim that the grand jury that indicted Gendron did not accurately reflect the demographic makeup of the community. Judge Vilardo, while noting the irony of the claim in a hate crimes case, did not immediately rule on the motion. The prosecution maintains that any disparities were within acceptable guidelines and not a systematic exclusion, while the defense argues the opposite.

Read More

Supermarket Gunman Challenges Jury Composition in Hate Crime Trial

Attorneys for Payton Gendron, the gunman in the Buffalo supermarket shooting, are seeking to have the federal charges against him dismissed, citing a lack of representation of Black and Hispanic individuals on the grand jury that indicted him. They claim the jury selection process was flawed, leading to underrepresentation of these groups. Prosecutors, however, argue these claims are unfounded, stating that any disparities were within acceptable guidelines. The court is set to hear arguments on the defense’s motion, which alleges a violation of Gendron’s rights.

Read More

DOJ Launches Russiagate Grand Jury Amid Epstein File Demands

Attorney General Pam Bondi has initiated a grand jury investigation into the intelligence surrounding President Trump and Russia’s involvement in the 2016 election. This action follows a criminal referral from Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard. Gabbard’s referral and accompanying declassified files allege suppression and manipulation of intelligence related to Russia’s election interference, sparking controversy and accusations of conspiracy. The Justice Department has not yet commented on the matter, while Democrats dispute the claims made by Gabbard.

Read More

Judge Rejects Epstein Grand Jury Transcripts Release: A Political Distraction?

US judge rejects bid to unseal Epstein grand jury transcripts from Florida probe, and the story behind this legal decision is rather intriguing.

The very nature of grand jury proceedings, with their cloak of secrecy, is designed to protect the integrity of the investigative process. Witnesses are often more forthcoming when they know their testimony is confidential, which allows for a more thorough and accurate investigation. So, it’s no surprise that the judge in this case upheld this essential protection. It’s about the system benefiting from candid and truthful witness statements.

Now, it seems pretty clear that the request to unseal the transcripts was always a long shot.… Continue reading

Judge orders surprise release of Epstein transcripts

I find myself deeply disturbed by the recent news of a judge’s abrupt decision to release the transcripts of the grand jury in the Jeffrey Epstein case. Reading through the accounts of the victims, who were shamelessly accused of “prostitution” by the prosecution, my heart aches for the injustice they endured. These underage girls were coerced, exploited, and abused by a man who operated a sophisticated pyramid scheme of sex trafficking, yet the authorities had the audacity to threaten them with jail time instead of providing the support and justice they deserved. It is profoundly troubling to think that in a case as egregious as this, the focus was shifted away from the abuser and onto the victims themselves.… Continue reading