In a recent revelation, Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), a government agency spearheaded by Elon Musk, was confirmed to have been terminated. OPM Director Scott Kupor stated that DOGE’s functions were absorbed by the OPM after Musk’s departure last May. Despite Musk’s initial projections of saving the government a trillion dollars, DOGE ultimately reported savings of $214 billion, an amount that may be overstated. The agency faced criticism and legal challenges, ultimately leading to debates on its efficacy and the potential loss of valuable talent due to its practices.
Read More
The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), led by Elon Musk, was disbanded eight months earlier than scheduled after failing to meet its objectives. Despite the agency’s mission to cut government spending, DOGE wasted an estimated $21.7 billion in its first six months and oversaw a $220 billion increase in federal spending. The agency’s short tenure was marked by chaos, including the firing and subsequent rehiring of federal employees, frozen government projects, and questionable salaries for some staff members. Following Musk’s departure and policy disagreements with President Trump, many DOGE figures have been quietly reassigned to other federal agencies.
Read More
A U.S. Senate investigations subcommittee report revealed the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), implemented by Elon Musk, wasted over $21 billion in its first six months. The report highlighted significant waste from mass layoffs of federal employees, resulting in $14.8 billion spent on early retirement packages and $6.1 billion on severance. Furthermore, DOGE’s funding freezes led to lost interest payments, spoiled goods, and cuts to programs that generated more revenue than they cost to operate. This included the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), and public health research cuts. Long-term projections suggest that the DOGE initiatives could cost taxpayers significantly more in the future.
Read More
Sahil Lavingia, a tech founder hired by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) to modernize VA systems, was unexpectedly dismissed after 55 days. His termination followed a blog interview where he praised the agency’s efficiency, contradicting common perceptions of government waste. Lavingia’s observations focused on opportunities for modernization rather than widespread fraud or abuse. This dismissal, despite DOGE’s stated commitment to transparency under Elon Musk’s leadership, highlights a perceived conflict between the agency’s public image and its internal actions.
Read More
The Trump administration’s decision to close a NASA research center in New York City is baffling on multiple levels. While the scientists are being forced to vacate by the month’s end, the government still retains the building’s lease from Columbia University. This means the closure likely won’t generate any taxpayer savings, contradicting any supposed fiscal responsibility behind the move.
Instead of cost-cutting, the decision reeks of a deliberate attempt to dismantle valuable assets. It’s easy to suspect this action isn’t about fiscal prudence, but rather a calculated effort to erase history and legacy, possibly even to enrich connected individuals through the sale of federal property.… Continue reading
Steve Bannon demands transparency from Elon Musk regarding his Department of Government Efficiency work, requesting specific details on uncovered fraud and waste before Musk disengages. Bannon also expressed distrust, demanding certification that no Trump administration data was accessed, despite supporting Musk’s efforts to cut government spending. He criticizes the current cuts as insufficient, advocating for deeper reductions in Pentagon and other discretionary spending to fund tax cuts, a position he maintains despite his past criticisms of Musk. Bannon further urges the Trump administration to implement previously discussed tax increases on millionaires.
Read More
Despite an initial $1 trillion goal reduced to $185 billion, achieving even this revised target by the September 2025 deadline appears improbable due to inflated cost-cutting claims. Analysis suggests that purported savings are largely based on subjective definitions of “waste,” disproportionately targeting non-American aid and liberal-leaning programs. The notable absence of defense spending cuts casts doubt on the sincerity of the deficit reduction effort. Ultimately, the limited success highlights the difficulty of substantial cost reduction and questions the prevalence of government waste as previously claimed.
Read More
HuffPost remains committed to delivering unbiased, free news despite pressure and financial constraints unlike other news outlets. The organization faces challenges maintaining this commitment and is seeking reader support. Contributions enable HuffPost to continue its mission of fearless journalism and provide an ad-free experience for supporters. Your support directly combats the influence of special interests and ensures continued access to unfiltered news.
Read More
The Trump administration spent $16 million preparing a migrant facility at Guantanamo Bay, housing 41 migrants before their transfer to Louisiana. This facility, intended to hold up to 30,000 migrants, proved far more expensive than anticipated, with individual tents costing an estimated $3.1 million each and failing to meet DHS standards. All migrants were subsequently moved to an ICE facility in Alexandria, Louisiana, rendering the Guantanamo Bay plan ineffective and costly. Congressional representatives have criticized the plan’s impracticality and expense.
Read More
Despite public Republican support for Elon Musk’s efforts at the Department of Government Efficiency, concerns are rising privately over widespread federal employee layoffs, including veterans. Rep. Richard Hudson clarified that Musk lacks direct hiring and firing authority, asserting his role is limited to uncovering waste, fraud, and abuse. This contradicts Musk’s own public pronouncements, highlighting a familiar pattern of conservative denial and deflection. The situation underscores the significant power wielded by Musk and the complex political ramifications of his actions.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood