The White House’s assertion that Elon Musk is not an employee of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) and holds no decision-making authority is a statement that immediately raises several questions. The sheer audacity of this claim, considering Musk’s highly visible role within the administration, is striking. It feels less like a sincere clarification and more like a carefully constructed legal maneuver designed to deflect responsibility.
This official denial directly contradicts the perception of Musk’s influence. He’s been frequently seen alongside President Trump, participating in press conferences held in the Oval Office and making public pronouncements on administration policy. To suggest that these appearances are purely advisory and hold no bearing on actual decision-making seems disingenuous at best.… Continue reading
Despite being classified as a special government employee and legally required to publicly file ethics forms disclosing his finances and conflicts of interest, Elon Musk’s forms are absent from the federal ethics website. Ethics experts contend that Musk, heading the White House’s Department of Government Efficiency, must comply with the same disclosure requirements as Cabinet officials. While the White House claims Musk is compliant, the lack of publicly available documentation raises concerns, particularly given Musk’s extensive business holdings with potential government overlaps. Senator Adam Schiff has requested clarification on this matter. The firing of the head of the Office of Government Ethics further intensified scrutiny.
Read More
A USAID internal memo prohibits employee communication with the press regarding disruptions to humanitarian aid, threatening dismissal for non-compliance. The memo falsely claims uninterrupted aid delivery, citing a Secretary Rubio waiver. However, reporting reveals that some aid approvals were delayed, and significant obstacles to aid distribution remain despite the waiver. This discrepancy highlights a stark contrast between the memo’s assurances and the on-the-ground reality.
Read More
Following a lawsuit by Doctors for America, a federal judge issued a temporary restraining order compelling the Department of Health and Human Services, CDC, and FDA to reinstate previously removed webpages and data. The judge found that the agencies’ actions, taken in compliance with President Trump’s executive order on gender ideology, likely violated federal law guaranteeing public access to information. This removal of vital health information, the judge argued, disproportionately harmed underprivileged Americans seeking healthcare. The agencies were ordered to restore the websites by 11:59 p.m. Tuesday, pending further litigation.
Read More
Two House Democrats have raised serious concerns about a $49,900 bill for painting Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s government-provided home. The sheer cost of the paint job, described as an “emergency,” has prompted questions about potential wasteful spending, especially given the overall $137,297 in maintenance and repair costs associated with the residence.
This hefty price tag raises immediate eyebrows. What type of residence requires such an exorbitant sum for interior painting? Even a large house would seem to require a far smaller expenditure for a complete repaint. The disparity between the apparent need and the amount billed suggests a potential misallocation of funds.… Continue reading
Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem’s Sunday appearance on CNN’s State of the Union sparked controversy. Noem defended Elon Musk’s access to sensitive government data, citing presidential authorization, despite prior Republican criticism of similar situations. Her assertion that the government is untrustworthy, while serving within it, highlighted the stark partisan divide over Musk’s sweeping, controversial restructuring efforts across numerous federal agencies. These actions, including agency closures and data access concerns, have triggered widespread anxiety among federal employees and legal challenges from Democrats.
Read More
The Pentagon’s recent decision to double the number of news outlets with access to its office spaces has sparked considerable debate. Initially, a select group—the New York Times, NBC News, Politico, and National Public Radio—were asked to vacate their dedicated workspaces. This move, announced a week earlier, was followed by the inclusion of a new roster of media organizations.
This expanded list now includes the New York Post, Breitbart, the Washington Examiner, the Free Press, the Daily Caller, Newsmax, the Huffington Post, and One America News Network. A striking feature of this new group is the prominent presence of outlets generally considered conservative or aligned with the political views of former President Donald Trump.… Continue reading
President Trump’s executive order mandated the removal of gender ideology-related content from all federal websites, leading to widespread purges across government and military agencies. Thousands of pages were removed or revised, impacting LGBTQ+ resources, information on women in the military, and data related to health and racial equity. While some content has been restored following criticism, significant gaps remain, particularly concerning LGBTQ+ and DEI initiatives. This action has sparked controversy and concern regarding potential long-term consequences for inclusivity and equality within the federal government and military. The extent of future changes remains unclear as agencies continue to implement the order.
Read More
Despite repeated denials by the Treasury Department and White House, a Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) technologist, Marko Elez, possessed write access to critical Treasury payment systems. Elez, a SpaceX and X employee with limited government experience, resigned following inquiries about his association with a racist social media account. This access, granted after the retirement of a senior Treasury official who resisted DOGE’s demands, allowed potential manipulation of federal payments. Subsequent reporting revealed that Elez made code changes, prompting concerns about the security and integrity of the US payment system.
Read More
Congressional Democrats being denied entry to EPA headquarters is deeply unsettling. The sheer audacity of this action demands immediate attention. It’s unconscionable that elected representatives of the people are blocked from a building funded by the very taxpayers they represent. This isn’t just about a procedural hiccup; it’s a blatant disregard for democratic principles and the rule of law.
The fact that seemingly unqualified individuals are granted access while elected officials are turned away is outrageous. This raises serious questions about security protocols and the potential for compromise of sensitive information. It suggests a concerning imbalance of power, where outside forces wield more influence than those legitimately elected to oversee government operations.… Continue reading
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker