President Trump’s executive order mandated the removal of gender ideology-related content from all federal websites, leading to widespread purges across government and military agencies. Thousands of pages were removed or revised, impacting LGBTQ+ resources, information on women in the military, and data related to health and racial equity. While some content has been restored following criticism, significant gaps remain, particularly concerning LGBTQ+ and DEI initiatives. This action has sparked controversy and concern regarding potential long-term consequences for inclusivity and equality within the federal government and military. The extent of future changes remains unclear as agencies continue to implement the order.
Read More
Despite repeated denials by the Treasury Department and White House, a Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) technologist, Marko Elez, possessed write access to critical Treasury payment systems. Elez, a SpaceX and X employee with limited government experience, resigned following inquiries about his association with a racist social media account. This access, granted after the retirement of a senior Treasury official who resisted DOGE’s demands, allowed potential manipulation of federal payments. Subsequent reporting revealed that Elez made code changes, prompting concerns about the security and integrity of the US payment system.
Read More
Congressional Democrats being denied entry to EPA headquarters is deeply unsettling. The sheer audacity of this action demands immediate attention. It’s unconscionable that elected representatives of the people are blocked from a building funded by the very taxpayers they represent. This isn’t just about a procedural hiccup; it’s a blatant disregard for democratic principles and the rule of law.
The fact that seemingly unqualified individuals are granted access while elected officials are turned away is outrageous. This raises serious questions about security protocols and the potential for compromise of sensitive information. It suggests a concerning imbalance of power, where outside forces wield more influence than those legitimately elected to oversee government operations.… Continue reading
Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) is seizing control of various federal agencies, with young, inexperienced staffers—many connected to Musk or Peter Thiel—involved in accessing sensitive information and disrupting agency operations. Following the publication of these staffers’ names, Musk and a Trump-appointed U.S. Attorney, Ed Martin, are threatening legal action against those who publicly identify them, despite the lack of any law prohibiting such disclosure. Martin, a known Trump supporter, has pledged to use the Justice Department’s resources to protect DOGE employees from what he claims are unlawful actions. This response has occurred despite the widespread dissemination of the staffers’ identities, including through memes, even on Musk’s own platform.
Read More
The NTSB’s reliance on Elon Musk’s X platform for news updates is deeply troubling. This situation raises serious concerns about the potential for censorship, manipulation, and a blatant disregard for transparency in government operations. The fact that an agency responsible for investigating transportation accidents is now constrained to using a platform owned by a private individual with known political leanings is alarming.
This development effectively places a significant constraint on the NTSB’s ability to communicate directly with the public. Any information released will be subject to the whims of the platform’s owner, raising the specter of information being filtered, delayed, or even suppressed entirely.… Continue reading
The USDA’s directive to remove mentions of climate change from public websites is a deeply troubling development. It represents an alarming attempt to erase a scientifically established reality from public discourse, a move that undermines efforts to address the impending climate crisis and jeopardizes the well-being of countless individuals and communities. The sheer audacity of this action suggests a deliberate effort to downplay the severity of the situation and, perhaps, to prevent any meaningful policy responses.
This blatant disregard for scientific consensus is particularly egregious given the significant impact climate change is already having on agricultural practices and food security. The USDA, an agency responsible for supporting and regulating agriculture, should be at the forefront of addressing climate change’s impacts, not actively suppressing information about it.… Continue reading
The White House’s recent rescission of Trump’s funding freeze highlights a chaotic back-and-forth, fueled by intense public opposition. The initial freeze, a sweeping measure impacting numerous federal programs, sparked immediate and widespread outrage.
This immediate and intense backlash wasn’t solely confined to partisan divides; concerns extended across the political spectrum, unifying people from various backgrounds who were affected or deeply disturbed by the potential consequences. The sheer volume and intensity of the response appear to have played a significant role in the administration’s decision to reverse course.
The administration’s response to the outcry is marked by confusion and shifting narratives. Initial statements suggested a complete rescission of the freeze, projecting an image of responsiveness to public concerns and a willingness to “listen to the people.”… Continue reading
Over the weekend, the Department of Justice removed all information regarding the January 6th Capitol riot from its website. This action followed President Trump’s pardon of those involved in the riot and aligns with a broader trend of the administration removing content related to controversial issues. The removal includes a database of over 1,200 Capitol breach cases, eliminating access to individual case files and related information. While some press releases remain, the database itself is inaccessible, leaving the reasons behind this action unconfirmed by the Department of Justice.
Read More
Daily email notifications for matching items are available. These notifications are sent only when new items appear, and only once per day. A successful notification save is confirmed; however, an error message displays if saving fails. The frequency of emails is limited to prevent excessive messaging. Users can manage their notification preferences as needed.
Read More
The removal of the Constitution from the White House website is undeniably a significant event, sparking a whirlwind of speculation and concern. The immediate reaction ranges from outrage to suspicion, with various explanations being proposed. Some believe it was a deliberate act, a symbolic rejection of the very document that underpins the nation’s governance. The phrase “fuck the constitution” echoes in the background of this interpretation, adding fuel to the fire of this particularly cynical view.
Conversely, others suggest it was a simple mistake, perhaps an unintentional oversight by a new IT staff member. This explanation, while seemingly innocuous, struggles to fully alleviate the anxieties surrounding the incident.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood