A Hinds County Chancery Court judge ruled that the Mississippi Legislature is exempt from the state’s Open Meetings Act, upholding a prior Ethics Commission decision. This decision allows the Republican House majority to continue holding private caucus meetings to plan legislative agendas without public oversight. The judge reasoned that while the Act includes legislative committees, explicitly including the Legislature itself would be redundant. This ruling has been criticized as undermining transparency and public access to crucial policymaking processes.
Read More
The US Justice Department’s decision to cut the database tracking federal police misconduct is deeply troubling. It feels like a deliberate attempt to obscure the extent of police brutality and misconduct, particularly as tensions rise and dissent grows. The timing, coinciding with increased political polarization and a seeming shift towards more authoritarian policies, raises serious concerns about accountability and transparency.
This move is not simply an oversight; it feels calculated. By eliminating the database, the government effectively lowers the visible count of cases, mimicking how the handling of COVID-19 data minimized the apparent impact of the pandemic. This deliberate obfuscation creates an environment where potential abuses of power can easily go unchecked.… Continue reading
CNN’s Freedom of Information Act request to the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) regarding Elon Musk and associates’ security clearances received a dismissive response, citing the recent firing of the entire OPM privacy team. This action, mirroring Musk’s past firings at Twitter, limits public access to government records related to these clearances. The firings also included communications staff and FOIA request handlers, hindering transparency efforts. This follows OPM’s controversial “Fork in the Road” memo, echoing a similar communication from Musk.
Read More
The White House’s assertion that Elon Musk is not an employee of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) and holds no decision-making authority is a statement that immediately raises several questions. The sheer audacity of this claim, considering Musk’s highly visible role within the administration, is striking. It feels less like a sincere clarification and more like a carefully constructed legal maneuver designed to deflect responsibility.
This official denial directly contradicts the perception of Musk’s influence. He’s been frequently seen alongside President Trump, participating in press conferences held in the Oval Office and making public pronouncements on administration policy. To suggest that these appearances are purely advisory and hold no bearing on actual decision-making seems disingenuous at best.… Continue reading
Despite being classified as a special government employee and legally required to publicly file ethics forms disclosing his finances and conflicts of interest, Elon Musk’s forms are absent from the federal ethics website. Ethics experts contend that Musk, heading the White House’s Department of Government Efficiency, must comply with the same disclosure requirements as Cabinet officials. While the White House claims Musk is compliant, the lack of publicly available documentation raises concerns, particularly given Musk’s extensive business holdings with potential government overlaps. Senator Adam Schiff has requested clarification on this matter. The firing of the head of the Office of Government Ethics further intensified scrutiny.
Read More
A USAID internal memo prohibits employee communication with the press regarding disruptions to humanitarian aid, threatening dismissal for non-compliance. The memo falsely claims uninterrupted aid delivery, citing a Secretary Rubio waiver. However, reporting reveals that some aid approvals were delayed, and significant obstacles to aid distribution remain despite the waiver. This discrepancy highlights a stark contrast between the memo’s assurances and the on-the-ground reality.
Read More
Following a lawsuit by Doctors for America, a federal judge issued a temporary restraining order compelling the Department of Health and Human Services, CDC, and FDA to reinstate previously removed webpages and data. The judge found that the agencies’ actions, taken in compliance with President Trump’s executive order on gender ideology, likely violated federal law guaranteeing public access to information. This removal of vital health information, the judge argued, disproportionately harmed underprivileged Americans seeking healthcare. The agencies were ordered to restore the websites by 11:59 p.m. Tuesday, pending further litigation.
Read More
Two House Democrats have raised serious concerns about a $49,900 bill for painting Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s government-provided home. The sheer cost of the paint job, described as an “emergency,” has prompted questions about potential wasteful spending, especially given the overall $137,297 in maintenance and repair costs associated with the residence.
This hefty price tag raises immediate eyebrows. What type of residence requires such an exorbitant sum for interior painting? Even a large house would seem to require a far smaller expenditure for a complete repaint. The disparity between the apparent need and the amount billed suggests a potential misallocation of funds.… Continue reading
Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem’s Sunday appearance on CNN’s State of the Union sparked controversy. Noem defended Elon Musk’s access to sensitive government data, citing presidential authorization, despite prior Republican criticism of similar situations. Her assertion that the government is untrustworthy, while serving within it, highlighted the stark partisan divide over Musk’s sweeping, controversial restructuring efforts across numerous federal agencies. These actions, including agency closures and data access concerns, have triggered widespread anxiety among federal employees and legal challenges from Democrats.
Read More
The Pentagon’s recent decision to double the number of news outlets with access to its office spaces has sparked considerable debate. Initially, a select group—the New York Times, NBC News, Politico, and National Public Radio—were asked to vacate their dedicated workspaces. This move, announced a week earlier, was followed by the inclusion of a new roster of media organizations.
This expanded list now includes the New York Post, Breitbart, the Washington Examiner, the Free Press, the Daily Caller, Newsmax, the Huffington Post, and One America News Network. A striking feature of this new group is the prominent presence of outlets generally considered conservative or aligned with the political views of former President Donald Trump.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood