A recent court ruling determined that Donald Trump cannot revoke a lawyer’s security clearance simply because he disapproves of their clients. The court found that such actions violate First Amendment rights, as the government failed to provide an individualized assessment of the lawyer’s eligibility for clearance and instead targeted him for his past legal work. The judge’s decision, based on the preliminary injunction record, also highlighted the lack of due process in the clearance revocation process. The ruling specifically stated that the government’s actions were retaliatory in nature.
Read More
In a recent court ruling, a federal judge blocked a Trump administration attempt to revoke whistleblower attorney Mark Zaid’s security clearance. The judge determined the administration’s action was retaliatory and lacked due process, specifically citing the lack of an individualized national security assessment. Zaid successfully argued that the clearance revocation hindered his ability to properly advise clients. Consequently, the judge granted a preliminary injunction to reinstate Zaid’s security clearance, though it was temporarily put on hold to allow the Justice Department to consider an appeal.
Read More
According to the State Department, a U.S. diplomat has been fired for violating a ban on romantic relationships with Chinese nationals. This dismissal marks the first instance of its kind under a policy implemented late last year prohibiting such relationships for U.S. government personnel in China. The diplomat admitted to concealing a relationship with a Chinese woman alleged to have ties to the Chinese Communist Party. The decision reflects a zero-tolerance policy to protect national security, as stated by the State Department spokesperson.
Read More
Gabbard, acting under the alleged direction of President Trump, revoked the security clearances of 37 intelligence officials involved in the 2016 Russia election interference assessment. She delivered the list to the CIA shortly before posting it on social media, without adequate consultation regarding its composition. Intelligence officials were reportedly unaware of the CIA officer’s undercover status. Moreover, the ODNI did not seek CIA input or inform them of her intention to publicize the list.
Read More
Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard faced criticism for posting a list of 37 officials whose security clearances were revoked, including the name of an undercover CIA officer. The CIA was reportedly unaware of the list prior to its publication and was not consulted, despite Gabbard’s office sending it the night before. Experts expressed concern that the disclosure could jeopardize covert operations and international relations, potentially violating laws designed to protect intelligence officers. Gabbard stated the revocations were made at Trump’s direction to address the weaponization of intelligence, and legal experts have suggested that the disclosure could constitute a Privacy Act violation.
Read More
An Australian army officer, whose security clearance was revoked due to concerns of loyalty to Israel, has left the Australian Defence Force. The officer, who had served 19 years, admitted to not viewing Israel as a foreign government and withholding information about training courses in Israel. Despite the officer’s involvement with a community security group, the security agency noted the importance of transparency surrounding such activities. While the department stated that security clearance holders are regularly reviewed, Senator David Shoebridge has criticized the department for not answering the questions about whether a review of CSG groups had been undertaken.
Read More
The Independent’s reporting provides essential context on developing stories, including investigations into financial matters and documentaries on crucial social issues. During a recent top-secret briefing in the Oval Office, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg unexpectedly appeared, causing concern due to security clearance issues. This incident exemplifies the informal atmosphere of the Trump White House, where the Oval Office is referred to as “Grand Central Terminal,” with a constant flow of people and a less structured environment compared to previous administrations. This open environment reflects Trump’s preference for interacting with various individuals, and his desire to have others involved in the decision-making process.
Read More
Following reports in Dagens Nyheter regarding “sensitive” photos from his Grindr account, Dan Eliasson Thyberg withdrew his acceptance of the National Security Advisor position. He acknowledged failing to disclose the photos to the government. Deputy National Security Adviser Annika Brändström will temporarily assume the role while a new recruitment process commences. This marks the second instance of a Swedish National Security Advisor leaving under unusual circumstances.
Read More
A long-time Department of Homeland Security employee was placed on administrative leave and faces security clearance revocation for inadvertently emailing a reporter unclassified but sensitive details of an upcoming ICE operation. This contrasts sharply with the case of Trump administration officials who shared military plans via Signal chat, facing no repercussions despite the arguably more serious breach. Experts highlight the disparity in punishment, arguing both incidents represent careless handling of sensitive information and should receive similar consequences. The DHS employee’s actions, while unintentional, are being severely penalized, raising concerns about unequal treatment within the Trump administration. The employee’s lengthy career and apolitical reputation further underscore the perceived unfairness of the situation.
Read More
CNN’s Freedom of Information Act request to the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) regarding Elon Musk and associates’ security clearances received a dismissive response, citing the recent firing of the entire OPM privacy team. This action, mirroring Musk’s past firings at Twitter, limits public access to government records related to these clearances. The firings also included communications staff and FOIA request handlers, hindering transparency efforts. This follows OPM’s controversial “Fork in the Road” memo, echoing a similar communication from Musk.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker