Three organizations—the Alliance for Retired Americans, AFGE, and SEIU—have filed a lawsuit against the Treasury Department, alleging that Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) is illegally accessing sensitive U.S. Treasury payment data in violation of privacy laws. The suit seeks a restraining order to block DOGE’s access to the system, which handles Social Security, Medicaid, and other crucial government payments. The plaintiffs argue that this unauthorized access jeopardizes the personal information of millions of Americans and that Treasury Secretary Bessent acted improperly by granting this access and retaliating against a civil servant who tried to prevent it. The lawsuit underscores concerns about the security and privacy of sensitive taxpayer data within the U.S. Treasury system.
Read More
Unconfirmed and unpaid, Elon Musk wields immense influence as a presidential advisor, leveraging his X platform and vast wealth to drastically reshape the federal government. Despite lacking formal authority, he’s implemented significant budget cuts and personnel changes, including a controversial attempt to dismantle USAID. This unprecedented power grab has sparked outrage from Democrats and concern over conflicts of interest, yet the Republican Congress remains largely passive. Musk’s actions raise serious questions about governmental oversight and the balance of power in the United States.
Read More
The upcoming four years represent a pivotal moment for America, demanding unwavering commitment to unbiased journalism. HuffPost, facing increased need for support, is now offering ad-free access to qualifying contributors. This initiative aims to sustain HuffPost’s mission of providing free, fair news during this critical period. Continued support is crucial to ensure the continuation of this vital service.
Read More
Elon Musk’s associates, including former employees from his companies and even college students, have assumed significant roles within the General Services Administration (GSA). This team, some of whom were involved in Musk’s Twitter takeover, is implementing drastic cost-cutting measures, aiming for a 50 percent reduction in GSA spending. Concerns have arisen regarding their access to sensitive government data and systems, including potential use of White House security credentials, raising serious security risks. The group’s actions are perceived by some GSA employees as a corporate takeover rather than service to the American public.
Read More
Recent polling data reveals widespread voter concern that Elon Musk’s new Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) will primarily benefit Musk himself, rather than improve government efficiency. A majority of voters believe DOGE will target crucial social programs like Social Security, Medicare, and food assistance for cuts. This concern is particularly strong regarding potential cuts to healthcare and veterans’ benefits. Framing DOGE’s proposed cuts as benefiting corporations and billionaires significantly decreases its public favorability, especially among independent voters.
Read More
Established in 1988 following the Lockerbie bombing, the aviation safety committee, comprised of industry stakeholders and victims’ representatives, has historically played a crucial role in improving air travel safety through its impactful recommendations. However, following recent changes in presidential administration, the committee is currently without members, leaving a critical gap in oversight. This lack of oversight coincided with a deadly mid-air collision, raising questions about the potential impact of administrative changes on aviation safety. Recovery efforts are underway following the crash, which resulted in no survivors.
Read More
President Trump fired seventeen inspectors general, prompting accusations of undermining governmental oversight. This late-night purge, deemed legally questionable by some, removed watchdogs responsible for identifying waste, fraud, and abuse within federal agencies. Critics argue this action dismantles checks on presidential power and facilitates widespread corruption, while supporters may claim it removes those who oppose the administration. The firings seemingly violated federal law by failing to provide Congress with the mandated 30-day notification.
Read More
Trump’s late-night purge of at least twelve independent inspectors general is a deeply troubling development, raising serious concerns about the erosion of checks and balances within the American government. The sheer number of dismissals, seemingly conducted without the required 30-day notice to Congress as mandated by federal law, suggests a deliberate attempt to circumvent oversight and accountability. This action blatantly disregards established procedures and undermines the very institutions designed to ensure transparency and prevent corruption.
The timing of these dismissals, shrouded in the cover of night, further fuels suspicions of a calculated effort to avoid public scrutiny. It raises questions about what information these inspectors general might have been uncovering, and whether their investigations posed a threat to the administration’s agenda.… Continue reading
Gov. Abbott mistakenly sent condolences to the late First Lady Rosalynn Carter, a blunder that highlights a surprising lack of oversight within his office. It’s a story that sparks a wide range of reactions, from disbelief to outright anger, and reveals a deeper issue of competence, or perhaps a calculated lack thereof, within the Texas Governor’s office.
The fact that this error made it through multiple layers of review is astounding. One would expect that a statement of condolence, especially one from a governor, would undergo rigorous scrutiny before being released. The sheer number of individuals involved in crafting and approving such statements implies a systemic failure; a dozen or more people seemingly failed to notice that Rosalynn Carter passed away over a year ago.… Continue reading
Elon Musk and SpaceX are currently facing intense federal scrutiny regarding security protocols, as reported by the New York Times. The timing of these reviews is highly contentious, with some suggesting that the incoming administration intends to curtail or even halt them entirely. There’s speculation that these reviews may be significantly impacted, or even dismissed altogether, due to a potential change in political leadership and priorities. This raises serious concerns about the consistency and effectiveness of national security oversight.
The upcoming shift in power could drastically alter the course of these investigations. The possibility of the investigations being abruptly ended due to political influence introduces significant questions about the impartiality and integrity of the review process.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood