Federal Judge Deborah Boardman issued a temporary restraining order, preventing the Department of Education and Office of Personnel Management from sharing personal data with DOGE affiliates until March 10th, citing violations of the Privacy Act. This follows a similar preliminary injunction issued by a New York court blocking Treasury Department data access to DOGE. Both rulings address concerns about unauthorized disclosure of sensitive personal information to DOGE, deemed irreparable harm. The Maryland court declined to extend its order to Treasury data due to the pre-existing New York injunction.
Read More
Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard instructed intelligence community personnel to disregard an email from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) demanding a list of five accomplishments from the previous week. This directive, echoed by other national security leaders, cited concerns about classified information and the potential compromise of national security. The OPM email, a tactic previously used by Elon Musk at Twitter, raised legal questions and confusion across various government departments, with some agencies directing employees to respond while others prohibited it. The conflicting orders highlighted the uncertainty and potential risks associated with Musk’s request.
Read More
The Department of Justice is instructing its staff to ignore Elon Musk’s requests for their job details. This directive, issued from the highest levels of the DOJ, signals a clear refusal to cooperate with Musk’s demands. The situation underscores the absurdity of the situation and highlights the power struggle between a private citizen and a governmental body.
This unprecedented request from Musk raises serious questions about his motives and authority. It’s a blatant overreach, attempting to exert control over a branch of the government he has no legitimate power over. The DOJ’s response is both firm and appropriate; maintaining the integrity of its operations by refusing to comply with what appears to be an arbitrary and potentially unlawful demand.… Continue reading
Missouri Representative Gerard Harms’s “Save MO Babies Act” proposes creating registries for pregnant individuals deemed “at risk” of abortion and prospective adoptive parents, aiming to facilitate adoptions and reduce abortions. The bill lacks a definition of “at risk,” raising concerns about potential government overreach and privacy violations. This legislation follows broader conservative efforts to expand state surveillance of pregnant individuals and restrict abortion access, mirroring national trends and legal challenges regarding patient data privacy. While Harms claims the program would be voluntary, the bill’s implications for reproductive rights and personal privacy remain significant.
Read More
The Trump administration barred Associated Press reporters from White House events for refusing to use the term “Gulf of America” instead of “Gulf of Mexico,” a decision condemned by dozens of news organizations. The AP, upholding its long-standing editorial policy, rejected the administration’s mandate to change the established geographical name. Surprisingly, even conservative outlets like Newsmax and Fox News joined the chorus of criticism, defending the AP’s First Amendment rights and warning of potential future repercussions. Despite the White House’s continued justification and refusal to reinstate the AP’s access, the AP vowed to defend its constitutional rights, highlighting growing concerns about government overreach.
Read More
The Washington Post’s report that President Trump is poised to seize control of the United States Postal Service (USPS) and dismiss its governing board is deeply concerning. This action, potentially executed via an executive order this week, would effectively place the independent mail agency under the Commerce Department’s authority.
This move represents a significant departure from the USPS’s traditional independence. The agency’s self-funding nature—receiving zero taxpayer dollars—further underscores the lack of any apparent financial justification for such drastic intervention. The very idea of absorbing the USPS into the administration raises serious questions about government overreach and the potential for partisan influence over a service that should remain neutral and accessible to all Americans.… Continue reading
Acting Social Security Commissioner Michelle King resigned after refusing the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) access to sensitive recipient data. Her refusal followed DOGE’s attempts to access Treasury and IRS databases, raising concerns about potential unlawful access to private information. The White House subsequently appointed Leland Dudek as acting commissioner while awaiting confirmation of President Trump’s nominee, Frank Bisignano. This departure highlights broader concerns among high-ranking officials regarding DOGE’s actions and the potential misuse of sensitive taxpayer data.
Read More
Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins announced plans to restrict Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits to healthier food options, aiming to curtail the use of food stamps on sugary drinks and junk food. This initiative, supported by Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency, will involve studying current SNAP spending and exploring ways to prioritize nutritious food purchases. The program, costing $112.8 billion annually, serves 42.1 million Americans, prompting concerns about efficient use of taxpayer funds. Existing bipartisan congressional proposals to study SNAP purchases and restrict unhealthy food purchases align with this new administration focus.
Read More
Elon Musk, head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), is systematically dismantling federal agencies, starting with USAID. Motivated by a belief in his own superior leadership and a desire to wield power, Musk is undertaking a large-scale bureaucratic purge. This involves terminating thousands of federal employees and slashing funding for crucial government programs, despite criticisms that his approach lacks nuance and disregards positive aspects of the targeted agencies. Musk justifies his actions by citing alleged waste and inefficiency, a claim supported by President Trump, though some reports contradict Musk’s assertions.
Read More
Elon Musk’s purported Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) embedding itself within the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) represents a deeply unsettling development. The sheer audacity of this action, seemingly authorized by an executive order exceeding Congressional authority, is alarming. The lack of substantial pushback is even more concerning, painting a picture of a system failing to uphold its own checks and balances. The characterization of this move as a “metastasizing cancer” feels tragically apt.
This isn’t just corporate overreach; it’s a blatant disregard for democratic processes. The creation of a position seemingly holding more power than Congress itself via executive order is fundamentally wrong.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood