Following a move from Maryland, Marisa and her family were subjected to a raid by agents identifying themselves as U.S. Marshals, ICE, and FBI. Despite repeatedly stating their U.S. citizenship, the family was forcibly removed from their home in their underwear, their house ransacked, and belongings seized. Marisa was left destitute, lacking funds for basic necessities like food and transportation, highlighting the devastating impact of the raid. The agents disregarded her pleas for assistance and the family’s clear citizenship.
Read More
Harvard University’s lawsuit against the Trump administration is a significant event, highlighting a clash between the government and a prestigious academic institution. The lawsuit stems from what many perceive as an unconstitutional and authoritarian overreach by the administration. The administration’s actions, ostensibly aimed at combating antisemitism on college campuses, are viewed by many as a thinly veiled attempt to control academic discourse and suppress dissenting viewpoints.
The administration’s demands on universities are extensive and intrusive. They include demands for detailed reporting on foreign students, allowing government-appointed overseers to ensure adherence to specific viewpoints, providing access to all hiring and admissions data to influence personnel decisions, and shutting down programs deemed to promote opposing ideologies.… Continue reading
Harvard University rejected the Trump administration’s demands for sweeping changes to its operations in exchange for $9 billion in research funding. These demands, which included audits of academic programs and alterations to governance, were deemed unlawful infringements on the university’s independence and constitutional rights. The administration subsequently froze $2.2 billion in grants and $60 million in contracts. Harvard maintains its commitment to fighting antisemitism but insists these objectives will not be achieved through governmental overreach. The threatened funding cuts jeopardize vital research partnerships crucial to American innovation and global competitiveness.
Read More
The recent case of a U.S.-born man held by ICE under Florida’s new anti-immigration law highlights a deeply concerning trend. This situation underscores the escalating anxieties surrounding the erosion of civil liberties and due process in the United States. The arbitrary detention of a citizen, seemingly based on spurious charges and the mere request of ICE, represents a significant breach of constitutional rights. This isn’t simply about immigration; it’s about the potential for unchecked government power to target anyone deemed undesirable.
The initial reaction to news of the detention has been a mix of disbelief and alarm. Many point to historical precedents, such as the Japanese-American internment camps, to illustrate the dangers of unchecked government power targeting specific groups.… Continue reading
The Department of Education issued an ultimatum to Harvard University, demanding viewpoint diversity audits and threatening to control the university’s admissions and hiring practices. This action, deemed extortionate by some, prompted Harvard to defiantly refuse to comply, citing threats to its academic freedom and institutional values. Simultaneously, Boston immigration lawyers received threatening deportation notices from the Department of Homeland Security, seemingly intended to intimidate both them and their clients. These incidents, occurring near the 250th anniversary of the battles of Lexington and Concord, evoke the spirit of defiance against governmental overreach. The White House further escalated the situation by threatening to revoke Harvard’s tax-exempt status.
Read More
Harvard University president Alan Garber defied the Trump administration’s demands to suppress student speech and diversity initiatives, rejecting attempts to dictate the university’s academic pursuits and admissions policies. This defiance resulted in the administration freezing $2.2 billion in grants and a contract, escalating the conflict to a showdown over academic freedom. Unlike other universities that capitulated to pressure, Harvard’s stance could galvanize a unified response from academia against government overreach. This action marks a significant challenge to the administration’s suppression of free speech, reminiscent of past eras of censorship.
Read More
The arrest of Mohsen Mahdawi, a Columbia University associate of Mahmoud Khalil, by Department of Homeland Security (DHS) agents has sparked outrage and fear. Mahdawi’s arrest, occurring during his citizenship hearing, felt less like a legal process and more like a kidnapping to many observers. The swift action, lacking even the appearance of a clear criminal suspicion, has left many questioning the motivations and legality of the DHS’s actions.
The concerns extend beyond Mahdawi’s individual case. His situation highlights a pattern of questionable detentions followed by hastily filed habeas petitions, a worrying trend suggesting a deliberate strategy to circumvent legal protections.… Continue reading
The US Department of Education froze $2.3 billion in federal funds to Harvard University due to the university’s refusal to comply with White House demands. These demands, aimed at combating antisemitism and alleged civil rights violations, include dismantling diversity programs, implementing “merit-based” admissions, and cooperating with immigration authorities. Harvard’s president stated that the demands represent unwarranted government overreach into academic affairs and are a political ploy, prompting a lawsuit challenging the legality of the funding cuts. The dispute highlights a conflict between federal oversight and academic freedom at prestigious universities.
Read More
Harvard University has unequivocally stated it will not comply with the Trump administration’s demands. This firm stance against what many perceive as government overreach into the realm of academic freedom is a significant development. The university’s decision is not merely a symbolic gesture; it represents a powerful rejection of attempts to dictate educational practices and research agendas. It’s a bold move, considering the substantial federal funding Harvard receives.
This defiance stems from a fundamental belief that no government, regardless of its political affiliation, should have the authority to control what a private university teaches, who it hires, or what areas of study it pursues.… Continue reading
The Trump administration has reclassified over 6,000 living immigrants as deceased, thereby invalidating their Social Security numbers and access to essential services. This action, part of a broader effort to deter immigration under Biden-era programs, aims to encourage self-deportation. The immigrants’ information was transferred to a database used for tracking the deceased, effectively cutting them off from banking and other services. This tactic follows the revocation of legal status for those who entered the U.S. via the CBP One app, though a federal judge has blocked a similar order targeting other groups of immigrants.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood