This section, curated by the independent Shopping Trends team, aims to provide readers with valuable insights and product recommendations. Please note that this team operates separately from CTV News journalists, and affiliate links within this content may result in commission earnings for Shopping Trends. These earnings support the continued provision of such shopping-related information.
The president has signed an executive order to protect the domestic production of glyphosate-based herbicides, such as Roundup, and elemental phosphorus, citing national security concerns related to food supply. This order also aims to provide immunity for manufacturers from liability, a move strongly criticized by health and environmental advocates who highlight the herbicide’s links to cancer and ongoing litigation against companies like Bayer. Critics argue this order prioritizes chemical companies over public health and betrays promises made to voters concerned about pesticide use.
Despite a landmark $289 million verdict against Monsanto for distributing a weedkiller containing the carcinogenic chemical glyphosate, President Trump issued an executive order mandating its production. Invoking the Defense Production Act, Trump claimed a lack of glyphosate herbicides would “critically jeopardize agricultural productivity.” This decision, however, drew sharp criticism from public health advocates and environmental groups who viewed it as a betrayal of promises to protect public health and a move to grant legal immunity to Bayer, the company that acquired Monsanto. The executive order also came after a study supporting glyphosate’s safety was retracted due to ethical concerns regarding Monsanto’s involvement and after Bayer had made a significant donation to the Trump inaugural committee.
Lebanon has accused Israel of a “health crime” following allegations of aerial spraying of a cancer-linked herbicide, glyphosate, over southern farmlands. This action is said to threaten food security, damage vegetation and soil fertility, and pose risks to the entire food chain, according to Lebanese ministries of agriculture and the environment. Such alleged tactics are viewed as part of a broader campaign of ecocide aimed at rendering southern Lebanon uninhabitable, following previous accusations of environmental destruction involving white phosphorus and incendiary bombs. The use of glyphosate compounds, especially over land already stressed by previous bombardments, further endangers insect communities and pollinators, compounding the long-term, cumulative environmental harm inflicted upon the region.
Georgia has enacted legislation shielding pesticide manufacturers, like Bayer, from lawsuits alleging failure to warn of potential dangers, mirroring a similar law in North Dakota. This law protects manufacturers adhering to federal labeling requirements, specifically impacting lawsuits against Bayer’s Roundup weed killer, which contains glyphosate. While the EPA considers glyphosate non-carcinogenic when used as directed, the law will not affect pre-existing litigation. Bayer, facing numerous lawsuits and significant financial settlements, actively supports such legislation alongside an extensive public relations campaign.
Bayer, a multinational pharmaceutical and life sciences company, has been ordered to pay a staggering $2.25 billion in damages after a jury linked their herbicide, Roundup, to cancer. As someone with a background in chemical engineering and scientific knowledge, I have some personal insights and opinions on this controversial issue.
Firstly, it is disheartening to see corporations like Bayer create subsidiaries to avoid paying the debts they owe. Johnson and Johnson’s bankruptcy maneuver serves as a reminder of the questionable practices that these companies resort to in order to evade their responsibilities. It is frustrating to witness the power that these corporations wield, seemingly above the law.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker