In an interview with The New York Times, President Donald Trump stated his “own morality” is the primary constraint on his power to order military action, asserting he doesn’t necessarily need to abide by international law. This follows an increasingly aggressive military posture, including operations in Venezuela, and threats against other countries and territories. Trump also expressed a desire for the US to possess Greenland, citing psychological needs, and signaled he may not be concerned about his family’s foreign business dealings in his second term. Furthermore, Trump discussed his views on China and Taiwan, and NATO, and indicated a potential choice between the military alliance and acquiring Greenland.
Read More
The Trump administration’s strategy for Venezuela appears to lack a cohesive plan, potentially relying on bullying or the assumption of a welcoming reception for U.S. troops, even as American oil companies are poised to exploit resources. Despite the existing regime’s defiance, there are indicators that the administration might permit the current Vice President to remain in power if she embraces a capitalist system favorable to U.S. oil interests. This approach, alongside Russia’s silence and former testimonies, implies a potential agreement where the U.S. could be trading off territories like Ukraine and Taiwan for influence in other regions. Furthermore, the 2025 National Security Strategy signals a shift away from traditional alliances, implying a new global order defined by spheres of influence and the pursuit of wealth by major powers.
Read More
According to Ukrainian intelligence, internal Kremlin forecasts predict that continued warfare in Ukraine until 2026 would severely hinder Russia’s global competitiveness, potentially relegating it to a regional power. These forecasts, which reportedly include scenarios extending to 2045, suggest a need for conflict resolution by 2026 to maintain parity with the US and China. The Ukrainian assessment aligns with similar recent statements from other Ukrainian officials. The Kremlin has not commented on these reports.
Read More
China’s relationship with the West has always been a complex dance of power, competition, and strategic maneuvering. The recent call from NATO for China to stop aiding Russia if it seeks good relations with the West is not surprising, given the current geopolitical landscape. However, it raises some thought-provoking questions about the nature of international relations and power dynamics in today’s world.
From a realist perspective, China’s actions are driven by their own interests and strategic goals. The idea that China would prioritize good relations with NATO over their partnership with Russia seems unlikely, especially considering the history of tense relations with the West, particularly the US.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker