Unlike the initial Trump administration’s relatively limited protectionist measures, the current administration’s actions are far more drastic and damaging, causing significant turmoil in global bond markets and eroding investor confidence in U.S. debt. This unprecedented trade war, fueled by the misuse of emergency powers, is jeopardizing America’s international credibility and economic standing. The resulting economic damage will be substantial, impacting businesses and workers, while other nations are already adapting and forging new trade alliances. Even with a potential shift in administration, rebuilding trust and restoring America’s economic dominance will be a lengthy and arduous process.
Read More
Donald Trump’s behavior exhibits a rapidly escalating pattern of increasingly erratic and destructive actions, exceeding even the most pessimistic predictions. His actions, from undermining Ukraine to threatening NATO allies and potentially annexing Canada, demonstrate a trajectory of exponentially worsening conduct. This escalation is driven by his malignant narcissism and the ambitions of his extremist associates, creating an unprecedented threat to global stability. Predicting his future actions is nearly impossible due to this accelerating pattern, demanding immediate attention and proactive strategies for mitigation. The potential for catastrophic outcomes necessitates preparedness for a severely worsening situation.
Read More
The prospect of a U.S.-Russia partnership is undeniably jarring, a seismic shift in international relations that leaves many feeling disoriented. The sheer audacity of such a development, following years of strained relations and outright conflict, is enough to make anyone’s head spin. This isn’t simply a change in policy; it feels like a betrayal of long-held alliances and a fundamental realignment of global power dynamics.
The current situation seems to be the culmination of a long-brewing crisis, one that many believe was foreshadowed years ago. The suspicions surrounding Russian interference in past elections have solidified into a widely held belief that a foreign power exerted significant influence over the American political landscape.… Continue reading
The Munich Security Conference report highlights a global shift away from US-led international order, driven by President Trump’s reelection and subsequent foreign policy changes. Trump’s actions, including tariff threats and territorial ambitions, have created significant global uncertainty, prompting other powers to view the US as a risk. The report questions whether reduced US engagement will exacerbate or mitigate global instability. The upcoming conference aims to address pressing issues, including the ongoing war in Ukraine.
Read More
In the past two weeks, the Trump-Musk administration has enacted drastic measures, including eliminating nearly all foreign aid, threatening crippling tariffs on key allies, and pardoning violent insurrectionists. Further actions include freezing climate and infrastructure funding, harming farmers with misguided water releases, and escalating attacks on transgender rights. These actions, coupled with the appointment of controversial cabinet members and the detention of migrants in Guantanamo Bay, represent a widespread assault on democratic norms and global stability. The scale of these actions has been described as a “distributed denial of service attack on people who believe in reality.”
Read More
Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov announced Russia will end its self-imposed moratorium on deploying intermediate- and short-range nuclear missiles, citing the US’s global deployment of similar weapons. This decision follows a recent Russian missile test and is presented as a retaliatory measure to US and UK arms supplies to Ukraine. The US plans to deploy long-range missiles in Germany in 2026, a move defended by Germany but criticized by Russia as a significant threat. This escalation reverses decades of arms control agreements, raising concerns about a new arms race and global instability.
Read More
Russia’s use of a MIRVed ballistic missile in Ukraine marks a dangerous escalation, representing the first-ever combat use of this technology. This departure from Cold War deterrence doctrine, where such missiles were designed to prevent nuclear war, now raises concerns about a “use them or lose them” scenario, incentivizing preemptive strikes. The high destructive capacity and vulnerability of MIRVs, even in conventional use, increases global instability. The proliferation of MIRV technology among various nations further exacerbates this risk, creating a more dangerous geopolitical environment.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood