A North Carolina Court of Appeals ruling, decided along party lines, favors Republican Supreme Court candidate Jefferson Griffin, despite his loss to Democrat Allison Riggs. This decision challenges over 65,000 votes, disproportionately affecting young and Black voters, potentially overturning the election results. While 60,000 challenged votes were upheld, thousands more remain contested, jeopardizing the integrity of the election. The outcome could establish a Republican supermajority on the state Supreme Court and severely undermine voter confidence.
Read More
The Ohio Republican Party’s deliberate obfuscation of Issue 1, aimed at preventing fair electoral districting, exemplifies a pattern of manipulative behavior. This follows the conviction of Ohio’s former Republican House Speaker and party chairman for a massive bribery scheme. The author, a long-time Ohio resident, argues that this corruption and disregard for voter understanding renders the Republican Party unworthy of his vote. He urges Ohio voters to carefully consider the implications of electing Republicans, particularly for statewide offices. The author concludes that the party’s actions necessitate a change in leadership to restore integrity to Ohio’s government.
Read More
The SAVE Act, narrowly passing the House 220-208, requires proof of citizenship for voter registration. Four Democrats joined Republicans in supporting the measure, which has previously failed in the Senate. Supporters argue it protects American elections, while critics contend it could disenfranchise millions. The Act includes provisions to accommodate name changes, aiming to mitigate concerns about voter access.
Read More
Despite Elon Musk’s record-breaking $21 million investment and dramatic pronouncements framing the Wisconsin Supreme Court race as crucial to “the fate of Western civilization,” his chosen candidate lost to liberal appellate Judge Susan Crawford. Musk subsequently downplayed the defeat, emphasizing the passage of a voter ID amendment as the election’s most significant outcome, a claim echoed by President Trump. However, Wisconsin already had voter ID laws, and the amendment merely enshrined them constitutionally. The race’s actual consequence, as Musk himself acknowledged, lies in the upcoming redrawing of Wisconsin’s congressional districts, where a liberal majority on the court could impact future Republican control of the House.
Read More
More than 900 people gathered to make their voices heard regarding their U.S. Representative, Andy Barr. The event, however, took on an unexpected tone as Representative Barr was absent. This absence, viewed by many as a deliberate snub, only served to amplify the message of the attendees. The sheer number of people present underscores the depth of feeling within the community.
The organizers of the event symbolically placed an empty chair on stage, adorned with a photograph of Mr. Barr, rubber chickens, and the words “missing” and “too scared to hold a town hall and respond to constituents’ concerns.” This powerful visual representation encapsulated the frustration and disillusionment felt by many present.… Continue reading
President Trump rescinded President Biden’s executive order that ensured the inclusion of all residents, regardless of immigration status, in the census count used for apportionment of House seats and Electoral College votes. This reversal reinstates the Trump administration’s attempt to exclude undocumented residents, a move previously blocked by the Supreme Court. The decision potentially paves the way for the creation of gerrymandered districts advantageous to Republicans, building on prior efforts to collect citizenship data at the neighborhood level. The implications of this action on the 2030 census remain to be seen, with ongoing debate surrounding the inclusion of non-citizens in apportionment counts.
Read More
Republican Judge Jefferson Griffin’s lawsuit challenges the results of North Carolina’s Supreme Court election, where he lost to Justice Allison Riggs by a narrow margin. He seeks to invalidate tens of thousands of votes due to alleged registration irregularities, a move legal experts deem an attempt at mass disenfranchisement. This action, supported by the RNC, is seen as setting a dangerous precedent for future elections, potentially undermining faith in the democratic process. The case is currently before both the state Supreme Court and the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, with significant implications for the integrity of elections nationwide.
Read More
Republicans narrowly secured a House majority, with their 220-215 advantage (soon to be 217-215) hinging on three North Carolina seats gained through extreme gerrymandering. This partisan map manipulation, enabled by the Supreme Court’s refusal to address gerrymandering claims, significantly skewed the playing field in favor of the GOP, despite Democrats receiving a higher share of the national popular vote. The resulting House map, heavily gerrymandered in multiple states, does not accurately reflect the national popular will, rendering the national vote totals largely meaningless. Ultimately, control over state legislative map-drawing processes proved decisive in determining the outcome of the House elections.
Read More
The GOP barely won the House, securing a razor-thin majority that has pundits and politicians alike buzzing. The victory, while technically a win, feels more like a squeaker, a near-miss for the Democrats, and a testament to the fragility of the Republican hold on power. The margin of victory is so slim, in fact, that it’s sparking intense debate about the role of gerrymandering and the true reflection of the national electorate’s will.
This narrow win has many questioning whether it represents a true mandate. The Republicans’ success hinges on a handful of districts, particularly in states like North Carolina, where aggressive gerrymandering is accused of artificially inflating the GOP’s representation.… Continue reading
North Carolina Governor Roy Cooper vetoed a bill deemed a “sham” designed to significantly weaken the power of Democrats within the state government. This action immediately sparked a firestorm of reactions, highlighting the deeply partisan nature of the legislation and the ongoing battle for control in North Carolina politics.
The bill itself, if passed, would have drastically altered the balance of power, effectively stripping Democrats of key influences within the state’s governing structure. This would have created a heavily skewed power dynamic, potentially leading to a considerable shift in policy decisions and legislative processes.
Governor Cooper’s veto was swiftly met with criticism from Republicans, who argued that the bill was necessary for effective governance and that it addressed legitimate concerns about the state’s current political climate.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood