President Trump rescinded President Biden’s executive order that ensured the inclusion of all residents, regardless of immigration status, in the census count used for apportionment of House seats and Electoral College votes. This reversal reinstates the Trump administration’s attempt to exclude undocumented residents, a move previously blocked by the Supreme Court. The decision potentially paves the way for the creation of gerrymandered districts advantageous to Republicans, building on prior efforts to collect citizenship data at the neighborhood level. The implications of this action on the 2030 census remain to be seen, with ongoing debate surrounding the inclusion of non-citizens in apportionment counts.
Read More
Republican Judge Jefferson Griffin’s lawsuit challenges the results of North Carolina’s Supreme Court election, where he lost to Justice Allison Riggs by a narrow margin. He seeks to invalidate tens of thousands of votes due to alleged registration irregularities, a move legal experts deem an attempt at mass disenfranchisement. This action, supported by the RNC, is seen as setting a dangerous precedent for future elections, potentially undermining faith in the democratic process. The case is currently before both the state Supreme Court and the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, with significant implications for the integrity of elections nationwide.
Read More
Republicans narrowly secured a House majority, with their 220-215 advantage (soon to be 217-215) hinging on three North Carolina seats gained through extreme gerrymandering. This partisan map manipulation, enabled by the Supreme Court’s refusal to address gerrymandering claims, significantly skewed the playing field in favor of the GOP, despite Democrats receiving a higher share of the national popular vote. The resulting House map, heavily gerrymandered in multiple states, does not accurately reflect the national popular will, rendering the national vote totals largely meaningless. Ultimately, control over state legislative map-drawing processes proved decisive in determining the outcome of the House elections.
Read More
The GOP barely won the House, securing a razor-thin majority that has pundits and politicians alike buzzing. The victory, while technically a win, feels more like a squeaker, a near-miss for the Democrats, and a testament to the fragility of the Republican hold on power. The margin of victory is so slim, in fact, that it’s sparking intense debate about the role of gerrymandering and the true reflection of the national electorate’s will.
This narrow win has many questioning whether it represents a true mandate. The Republicans’ success hinges on a handful of districts, particularly in states like North Carolina, where aggressive gerrymandering is accused of artificially inflating the GOP’s representation.… Continue reading
North Carolina Governor Roy Cooper vetoed a bill deemed a “sham” designed to significantly weaken the power of Democrats within the state government. This action immediately sparked a firestorm of reactions, highlighting the deeply partisan nature of the legislation and the ongoing battle for control in North Carolina politics.
The bill itself, if passed, would have drastically altered the balance of power, effectively stripping Democrats of key influences within the state’s governing structure. This would have created a heavily skewed power dynamic, potentially leading to a considerable shift in policy decisions and legislative processes.
Governor Cooper’s veto was swiftly met with criticism from Republicans, who argued that the bill was necessary for effective governance and that it addressed legitimate concerns about the state’s current political climate.… Continue reading
Governor Cooper vetoed a $227 million hurricane relief bill due to its inclusion of politically motivated clauses that unconstitutionally shift power from incoming Democratic officials to Republicans. These clauses include transferring control over key appointments, such as the State Board of Elections, and interfering with the Attorney General’s duties. Critics contend the bill prioritized partisan politics over timely disaster aid, with much of the funding not immediately accessible. The bill’s future hinges on whether the Republican-led General Assembly can override the veto, despite prior internal opposition to the legislation. Hurricane Helene’s impact on North Carolina necessitates swift and effective relief efforts.
Read More
NC’s next governor: Republicans are already taking away power from Democrat Josh Stein. The current Republican supermajority in the North Carolina legislature is actively stripping power from the incoming Democratic governor, Josh Stein, even before he takes office. This preemptive action highlights a pattern of partisan maneuvering, where Republicans aggressively seize control whenever possible, regardless of the consequences for the state’s citizens.
This isn’t a new tactic. Similar power grabs have occurred in other states, notably Wisconsin, where Republicans employed a similar strategy against Governor Tony Evers. The pattern reveals a larger strategy of consolidating power at every level of government, from federal to local, mirroring the actions of authoritarian regimes like Hungary under Viktor Orbán.… Continue reading
The North Carolina House passed a bill allocating $227 million in Hurricane Helene relief, but it also includes provisions significantly curtailing the power of incoming Democratic leaders. These unrelated provisions restrict the attorney general’s authority, alter the State Board of Elections’ composition, and eliminate several state commissions. The bill bypassed standard legislative processes, sparking criticism from Democrats who labeled it a partisan power grab. Despite some Republican dissent, the bill advanced, potentially facing a gubernatorial veto.
Read More
It’s a relief to see Congressman Joe Morelle taking action to reverse the U.S. Supreme Court’s immunity decision. The fact that someone in our government is paying attention and addressing this crucial issue gives me a glimmer of hope. Potential amendment texts need to be thoroughly vetted and discussed so that we can find a viable solution to this pressing problem. Leaving the SCOTUS decision unchallenged is simply not an option for the long-term health of our democracy.
The idea of a president using immunity to commit and conceal crimes is deeply troubling. While most U.S. presidents have been honorable individuals, they have all been ambitious.… Continue reading
As a resident of Texas, I am deeply disturbed by the recent GOP amendment that aims to change the way officials are elected in the state. The proposal suggests that officials should be elected based on the majority of counties, not the majority of voters. This scheme essentially hands over control of the entire state to the unpopulated red areas on the map, disenfranchising the majority of Texans who reside in the more populated urban centers.
It is evident that the GOP’s strategy is to tilt the playing field in their favor, ensuring that Democrats have virtually no chance of winning any state election.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood