The Bundestag overwhelmingly approved a substantial German defense spending bill, potentially transforming its military capabilities and challenging Russia’s continental dominance. The bill removes constitutional spending limits on defense, allowing for borrowing exceeding 1% of Germany’s GDP, a significant departure from its previous under-investment. Funding will bolster military equipment, personnel training, and support for Ukraine, with projected increases potentially doubling annual defense spending. The bill also includes investments in infrastructure and climate-related projects, showcasing a multifaceted approach to national security and economic growth. Passage in the Bundesrat is expected.
Read More
Germany’s recent approval of a massive spending package to bolster its defense capabilities marks a significant shift in the country’s post-war approach to military spending. This decision, potentially unlocking up to a trillion dollars in debt-financed investments over the next decade, is not merely an increase in budgetary allocation; it represents a fundamental reassessment of Germany’s role in European security. The move is driven by a complex interplay of factors, ranging from concerns about the reliability of US commitments under a previous administration to the need for a stronger European defense posture against potential Russian aggression.
The amendment to the German constitution, relaxing long-standing restrictions on debt, underlines the seriousness of the situation.… Continue reading
Airbus Defense and Space CEO Michael Schollhorn urges Germany to lessen its reliance on U.S. defense contractors, advocating for increased collaboration among European defense firms instead. This recommendation comes amid rising concerns over shifting U.S. foreign policy, including President Trump’s questioning of NATO commitments and potential pressure on European allies. Schollhorn highlights the upcoming German defense budget increase as a critical opportunity to prioritize European manufacturers and avoid further dependence on the U.S. He uses the example of Denmark’s F-35 purchase to illustrate the potential pitfalls of solely relying on American-made equipment. Ultimately, Schollhorn emphasizes a need for coordinated European defense spending and industry cooperation.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood