Following the successful use of a discharge petition to force a vote on the Epstein Files Transparency Act, Speaker Mike Johnson is considering raising the threshold for privileged motions and discharge petitions. This follows bipartisan efforts that bypassed Republican leadership and led to the bill’s passage, despite opposition from Johnson and former President Trump. The Epstein Files bill, which instructs the Department of Justice to release investigative files related to the late sex offender, unanimously passed both the House and Senate. With more lawmakers breaking rank, and the Speaker not giving an outlet for legislative pursuits, the Speaker may continue to see an increase in discharge petitions.
Read More
The Supreme Court has effectively given the green light to Donald Trump’s consolidation of power, allowing the illegal firing of a Federal Trade Commissioner by a 6-3 vote, and setting the stage to overturn a 90-year-old precedent. This decision, made via the shadow docket, lacks public explanation and signals the court’s intent to restructure the federal government by transferring power to the White House. The Court’s actions aim to dismantle the independence of agencies like the FTC, enabling the President to exert political influence and control over enforcement of federal law. This move raises concerns that the Supreme Court is dismantling the checks and balances that separate democracy from dictatorship.
Read More
According to conservative political consultant Rick Wilson, a power struggle is unfolding within the MAGA movement as President Donald Trump’s age becomes a factor. Wilson suggests that Vice President JD Vance is strategically positioning himself to assume leadership, citing Vance’s recent statements and “rumors from the Trumpverse.” Despite denials from the White House and Vance’s office, these allegations coincide with observations of Trump’s physical decline, including visible bruising, swollen ankles, and mental lapses. Trump’s health has been attributed to chronic venous insufficiency and hand-shaking paired with aspirin, but these claims have been widely met with skepticism.
Read More
On August 11th, the former president announced he was taking federal control of the police force in Washington, D.C., deploying the National Guard and declaring a “crime emergency.” This action was framed as a response to alleged lawlessness and linked to the removal of Confederate statues, invoking a “woke culture” as the cause of the city’s problems. The former president’s rhetoric mirrored that of white supremacist groups, who have been trying to “take back” the country. This move is part of a broader pattern of fearmongering, linking perceived incompetence and lawlessness with the political participation of Black people and other marginalized groups, echoing historical patterns of disenfranchisement.
Read More
President Trump announced his administration is considering taking over governance of Washington, D.C. while criticizing the city’s crime rates and suggesting the current elected government is insufficient. He stated that the White House has significant power in this regard, and could appoint a leader to improve the city. Trump mentioned his chief of staff was in close contact with Mayor Muriel Bowser, who supports D.C. statehood, a move that Democrats favor but Republicans oppose. The President also alluded to potential intervention in New York due to his dissatisfaction with a leading mayoral candidate, Zohran Mamdani.
Read More
Why, after a decade of marriage equality, do we still hear the echoes of warnings that it would lead to societal collapse? The simple answer, it seems, is that some people just don’t like it when the world doesn’t conform to their narrow worldview. They predicted the end of days, a descent into chaos, the breakdown of all that is good and holy. Yet, here we are, still standing, still functioning, and still, for the most part, the same civilization we were before.
The arguments themselves were often absurd, filled with hyperbolic claims about the future of marriage, family, and the very fabric of society.… Continue reading
Trump’s deployment of the National Guard in Los Angeles, ostensibly to quell unrest related to immigration enforcement, feels less like a measured response and more like a chilling dress rehearsal for authoritarian rule. This isn’t about effective policing; it’s about a calculated show of force intended to intimidate and control. The sheer scale of the military presence, far exceeding what a local law enforcement agency would require, screams of an underlying agenda beyond managing a potential protest.
This heavy-handed approach isn’t some unexpected escalation. For years, many have warned about the potential for Trump to exploit power for his own ends, culminating in precisely this kind of overreach.… Continue reading
Donald Trump’s threat to withhold federal funding from California because a transgender student is participating in track and field highlights a disturbing trend: leveraging the well-being of an individual and an entire state for political gain. It’s a blatant attempt to use the power of the federal government to enforce a narrow, discriminatory agenda.
This isn’t a novel tactic. Similar attempts have been made elsewhere, only to fail in the face of legal challenges. The inherent weakness of such threats lies in the reality that executive orders aren’t legislation. They’re directives, and their ability to override established laws and state autonomy is limited.… Continue reading
China’s imposition of a 34% tariff on all US imports represents a significant escalation in the ongoing trade conflict. This dramatic retaliatory measure, announced swiftly after the US implemented its own tariffs, has sent shockwaves through global markets. The immediate market reaction suggests a potentially catastrophic impact, with futures contracts plummeting dramatically before the market even opened. This is hardly surprising given the sheer scale of the tariffs and the significant volume of goods traded between the two economic giants.
The speed and breadth of China’s response caught many analysts off guard. Numerous pre-announcement predictions downplayed the likelihood of such a sweeping tariff increase, focusing instead on other potential retaliatory strategies.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood