The notion that Donald Trump is deliberately obscuring the reality of the war in Iran is a sentiment that surfaces with a concerning degree of regularity. It’s not just a passing thought; it seems to be a deeply held belief for many who observe his presidency and pronouncements. The core of this concern appears to stem from a fundamental distrust of his communication, particularly when it pertains to matters of conflict and international relations.
There’s a persistent feeling that the narrative surrounding the war in Iran, as presented by Trump, is at odds with independent assessments. For instance, there are strong claims that top U.S.… Continue reading
Despite mounting evidence, including independent analysis of video footage and missile types, that a U.S. missile attack caused the devastation at an Iranian elementary school, President Trump baselessly claimed Iran was responsible. Pentagon officials, including Secretary Pete Hegseth and Ambassador Michael Waltz, declined to endorse the president’s assertion, stating the matter was under investigation. This contradicted reports from Reuters and analysis by Bellingcat and The New York Times, which indicated U.S. forces were likely behind the strike. Democratic senators expressed horror at the reports, emphasizing the need for a thorough investigation into the incident, which Human Rights Watch suggested could be a war crime.
Read More
U.S. intelligence reports indicate that claims of Iran possessing missiles capable of reaching the United States in the near future are likely exaggerated. Assessments suggest it could take until 2035 for Iran to develop a militarily viable intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) from its existing satellite-launching technology, even with potential foreign assistance. While Iran has a significant ballistic missile program, experts note it is years away from developing the technology needed for an operational ICBM that could strike the U.S. homeland.
Read More
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker