In response to rising hate crimes and the normalization of hateful rhetoric, Michigan has expanded its 1988 ethnic intimidation law. The updated legislation, signed by Governor Whitmer, now includes sexual orientation, gender identity, disability, and age as protected characteristics under the hate crime statute. This amendment, championed by State Representative Noah Arbit, addresses previous failures to pass similar legislation, effectively strengthening protections against hate-motivated violence. The revised law will take effect on April 2nd.
Read More
President Trump’s executive order redefines “male” and “female” based on the type of reproductive cell produced at conception, impacting numerous federal agencies. This definition, lacking practical application details, poses severe risks for transgender individuals and potentially advances an anti-abortion agenda by implying fetal personhood from fertilization. Experts highlight the scientific inaccuracy of this definition, citing the complexities of sex determination beyond gamete size and the impossibility of determining sex at conception. The order’s broad implications and potential for discriminatory enforcement are cause for significant concern.
Read More
Representative Lauren Boebert mistakenly confronted an individual in a women’s restroom, believing it to be Representative Sarah McBride, who is transgender. Boebert’s actions stemmed from the newly reinstated ban on transgender individuals using bathrooms aligning with their gender identity. After realizing her error, Boebert apologized for the incident. McBride confirmed she was not directly involved and affirmed her adherence to the bathroom policy.
Read More
President Trump signed executive orders aiming to recognize only two sexes (male and female) and eliminate federal DEI programs deemed “radical and wasteful.” The gender order mandates the use of “sex” instead of “gender” in official documents, impacting passports and visas, and restricts taxpayer funding for gender-transition healthcare. A second order targets the dismantling of DEI initiatives within federal agencies, focusing on environmental justice programs and equity-related grants. These actions, announced on Martin Luther King Jr. Day, are framed as a return to merit-based systems, while opponents argue they represent a setback for racial and social justice and anticipate legal challenges.
Read More
The Swiss Federal Supreme Court upheld a lower court’s decision allowing a 16-year-old to change their gender designation on official documents without parental consent. This ruling interprets Article 30a of the Civil Code, which permits individuals aged 16 and older with the capacity for judgment to make this change. The court rejected the parents’ argument that a civil servant lacks the authority to assess a minor’s capacity, emphasizing the law’s intent to simplify the process and eliminate the need for medical certificates or parental approval. The decision clarifies that altering gender registration is an administrative act, separate from medical gender transition procedures.
Read More
Eighteen state attorneys general, primarily from Republican-led states, filed briefs supporting a Massachusetts middle school student, Liam Morrison, whose First Amendment rights were allegedly violated when he was suspended for wearing a “There are only two genders” shirt. Lower courts ruled against Morrison, finding the shirt demeaned transgender students, but the AGs contend this lacked evidence of substantial disruption. They argue the school’s evidence was insufficient, and supporting organizations warn of a chilling effect on free speech in schools. The case, backed by Alliance Defending Freedom and the Massachusetts Family Institute, awaits potential Supreme Court review.
Read More
Mike Johnson’s refusal to acknowledge Sarah McBride as a woman highlights a deeply troubling trend of intolerance and disrespect within political discourse. It’s not simply a matter of semantics; it represents a deliberate choice to invalidate McBride’s identity and deny her the basic dignity afforded to all individuals. This refusal to use correct pronouns and acknowledge her gender identity feels deeply personal and pointedly dismissive.
The issue goes beyond a simple disagreement on terminology. It’s a public repudiation of McBride’s lived experience and a blatant disregard for the feelings of her constituents who elected her. This act is a direct affront to the democratic process itself, as it undermines the validity of an elected official’s identity and the will of the voters who chose her.… Continue reading
The Supreme Court’s decision to maintain the block on the entirety of the Biden administration’s new Title IX rule has sparked a heated debate across the country. The central provision of the rule, which newly defines sex discrimination to include discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity, has been a point of contention for many. While it’s important to acknowledge that this ruling is not permanent and is only in place to allow the case to be fully decided by the courts, the implications of this decision are significant.
The argument that discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity is a form of sex-based discrimination is a complex one.… Continue reading
As I delve into the recent decision made by the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals regarding the fundamental right to change one’s sex on a birth certificate, I find myself grappling with the implications of the ruling. The court stated that there is no constitutional requirement for a birth certificate, and therefore, no fundamental right to change the sex marker on it. While I can understand the need for accurate record-keeping, especially for statistical and epidemiological purposes, I cannot help but question the reasoning behind this decision.
The argument that a birth certificate is a historical record of the sex assigned at birth seems rather reductive.… Continue reading
I recently came across an article discussing a ruling by the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that stated there is no fundamental right to change one’s sex on a birth certificate. This decision has sparked a lot of debate and raised many questions about the legalities and implications surrounding gender identity and documentation. As someone who values equality and human rights, I can’t help but feel compelled to share my thoughts on this matter.
First and foremost, it’s crucial to understand that a birth certificate is a historical record that documents a person’s sex at birth. It serves as a foundational piece of identification that is used for various administrative purposes, including obtaining other official documents such as driver’s licenses and passports.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood