Missouri law says pregnant women can’t get divorced. As I delve into this archaic and oppressive statute, I am appalled at the blatant lack of consideration for women’s autonomy and well-being. The idea that a woman’s marital status should be tethered to her pregnancy is not only regressive but also perpetuates dangerous power dynamics within relationships.
The implications of this law are profoundly troubling. Pregnant women, already vulnerable to heightened levels of stress and emotional turmoil, are now stripped of the agency to make decisions about their own lives and futures. By denying them the option to seek a divorce, the state is effectively trapping them in potentially abusive or unhealthy relationships, with severe consequences for both mother and child.… Continue reading
As a woman living in the United States, the news that pregnant women in Missouri are prohibited from getting divorced is not only shocking but downright appalling. It seems like we are going back in time instead of progressing forward in terms of women’s rights and autonomy. How can a state law dictate whether a woman can or cannot end a marriage, especially when she might be in a dangerous or abusive situation?
The fact that in some states, including Missouri, pregnant women are essentially trapped in a marriage with no way out is a clear violation of basic human rights.… Continue reading
Marjorie Taylor Greene, the name that seems to spark controversy with every utterance. This time, she’s taken a bold stance by suggesting that women should stop tempting Christian men. But wait, is this the same Marjorie Taylor Greene who has faced allegations of cheating on her husband? The same woman who seems to have a history that doesn’t quite align with the values she’s trying to preach? It begs the question, how can someone who has strayed from the path they advocate for be the one to dictate the actions of others?
The irony of Marjorie Taylor Greene’s statement is glaring.… Continue reading
This case of the Texas judge ruling that a school district can restrict the length of a male student’s natural hair has raised many eyebrows, including mine. How is it possible that in this day and age, we are still dealing with such archaic and discriminatory regulations? The fact that the ACLU had to intervene in a similar case in Texas previously shows that there is a pattern of targeting male students for their hairstyle choices.
The issue of gender-based discrimination becomes prevalent when looking at how this ruling targets male students specifically, without imposing similar restrictions on female students. The Texas CROWN Act, which was enacted to prevent discrimination based on hairstyles associated with race or culture, seems to have been completely disregarded in this case.… Continue reading
I can’t wrap my mind around State Senator Dusty Deevers’ desire to turn back the clock and go back to the 1600s. The very idea seems absurd and, quite frankly, terrifying. The 1600s were a time of great turmoil, with political and religious conflicts tearing Europe apart. Life expectancy was drastically lower, women had few rights, and scientific progress was stifled by superstition. It was a time when the church held immense power, often to the detriment of society.
It boggles my mind that there are people like Senator Deevers who long for such a backwards and regressive time. The advances we have made in terms of human rights, gender equality, and medical and technological innovation are incredible and worth celebrating.… Continue reading
Title: A Tragic Incident: Reflecting on a Devastating Act of Domestic Violence
Introduction:
Recently, the news has been filled with reports of horrifying incidents of family annihilators, where a parent fatally shoots their spouse and children. These incidents are heartbreaking and force us to question the state of our society and the prevalence of such acts. The most recent incident that has captured headlines is the case of a husband charged with fatally shooting his wife and three daughters in a suburban Illinois home, sparing only his 19-year-old son who witnessed the unimaginable tragedy.
Exploring the Themes:
When faced with such a tragic headline, it is natural to reflect on the themes and sentiments surrounding this act of violence.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood
‘Why Can’t We Go Back?’ Christian Nationalist State Sen. Dusty Deevers Wants To Go Back To The 1600s
I can’t wrap my mind around State Senator Dusty Deevers’ desire to turn back the clock and go back to the 1600s. The very idea seems absurd and, quite frankly, terrifying. The 1600s were a time of great turmoil, with political and religious conflicts tearing Europe apart. Life expectancy was drastically lower, women had few rights, and scientific progress was stifled by superstition. It was a time when the church held immense power, often to the detriment of society.
It boggles my mind that there are people like Senator Deevers who long for such a backwards and regressive time. The advances we have made in terms of human rights, gender equality, and medical and technological innovation are incredible and worth celebrating.… Continue reading