California Governor Gavin Newsom responded to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s new policy requiring physical fitness tests for military personnel, which would include height and weight requirements. Newsom took to social media to criticize the policy, using it as an opportunity to mock President Donald Trump’s physique. Newsom posted a photo of Trump and a satirical image from his press office, implying the president’s weight would disqualify him under the new military standards. The governor’s posts, including a reference to Trump’s fondness for fast food, quickly gained traction and highlighted the president’s reported height and weight discrepancies.
Read More
California Governor Gavin Newsom responded to former President Trump’s proposal to impose tariffs on foreign-made movies with a succinct critique, characterizing it as “PAY MORE AND ENJOY NOTHING.” Trump’s plan, shared on Truth Social, cited the loss of American movie production to other countries, particularly criticizing California. This mirrors a similar proposal from May which caused stock market declines. While the impact of tariffs on foreign intellectual property remains uncertain, the proposal comes amidst economic concerns and rising consumer prices.
Read More
Following a post from Governor Newsom’s press office labeling Stephen Miller a “fascist,” Republican Representative Derrick Francis Van Orden called for Newsom’s arrest, deeming the post “domestic terrorism” based on 18 U.S. Code § 2331. Van Orden’s critique cited the post’s alleged intent to influence government policy through intimidation. Ironically, the term “fascist” has been used by Miller himself to describe opponents and the Democratic party. Newsom’s office, however, has remained unyielding in its criticism.
Read More
In response to a recent AI-generated video posted by Donald Trump promoting “Medbeds,” a QAnon conspiracy theory, California Governor Gavin Newsom criticized the former president. The video, which was up for approximately twelve hours before being removed, featured a fabricated Fox News segment with an AI-generated clip of Trump. Newsom also highlighted Trump’s actions, including potentially shutting down the government and removing healthcare from millions. This incident occurred after Newsom himself used AI to counter a narrative about the government shutdown.
Read More
California Governor Gavin Newsom recently expressed concern about the possibility of the U.S. not holding a presidential election in 2028, alleging that efforts by former President Donald Trump to influence redistricting in Republican-led states could undermine the democratic process. In response, Newsom signed a bill proposing a special election in California to allow lawmakers to temporarily control the drawing of congressional maps, a move intended to favor Democrats and counter perceived partisan gerrymandering. This proposal, known as the Election Rigging Response Act, has sparked controversy, with opponents arguing it constitutes gerrymandering itself, while supporters claim it is a necessary measure to protect voters. The proposal faces opposition from various groups, including former Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger and the California Hispanic Chamber of Commerce.
Read More
California Governor Gavin Newsom expressed concerns about the future of democracy during an appearance on The Late Show with Stephen Colbert, accusing the Trump administration of attempting to “rig the midterm elections.” Newsom also criticized the politicization of the Centers for Disease Control and highlighted the upcoming special election on Prop. 50, a redistricting effort that could benefit California Democrats. His appearance coincided with his attendance at Climate Week in New York City and a meeting with former President Bill Clinton.
Read More
California Governor Gavin Newsom signed a bill prohibiting law enforcement, including ICE agents, from wearing masks. This law, which is likely to face legal challenges, aims to increase accountability and transparency by preventing masked agents from concealing their identities during raids. The bill was signed in Los Angeles, a city central to mass deportation protests. While ICE has previously stated masks are used to protect agents’ identities, President Trump defended their use, citing safety concerns.
Read More
Newsom signs legislation banning ICE agents from wearing masks in California, a move that has sparked a flurry of reactions, ranging from enthusiastic support to serious skepticism about enforceability and the practical implications. The core idea behind the legislation seems straightforward: if ICE agents are carrying out their duties legally, they should have nothing to hide, and removing the anonymity provided by masks would promote accountability. This echoes the sentiment that legitimate law enforcement should be transparent in their actions.
Right? The opposing view, often voiced, highlights concerns about the potential for illegal activities by ICE agents. It’s a strong accusation that fuels the argument for increased scrutiny and the importance of holding those in power accountable.… Continue reading
California has enacted a law prohibiting most law enforcement officers, including federal immigration agents, from covering their faces while on duty, a move Governor Gavin Newsom stated was a response to recent immigration raids involving masked agents. This legislation, which does include some exceptions, was immediately met with criticism from Trump administration officials who argued the ban would endanger agents and that the state lacks jurisdiction. While Newsom has countered these assertions, this new law also includes legislation that prevents immigration agents from entering schools and healthcare facilities without a warrant. This law has spurred other states such as Tennessee, Michigan, Illinois, New York, Massachusetts, and Pennsylvania to propose similar mask ban legislation.
Read More
More than half of California voters back Newsom redistricting plan: Poll – so, here’s the deal. It looks like a majority of California voters are on board with Governor Newsom’s plan to reshape the state’s congressional districts. And honestly, you can see why.
Texas has already gone down the gerrymandering rabbit hole, and frankly, it feels like letting the other side cheat without a response is just not an option. The proposed measure in California is explicitly a response to that, and it’s even framed as temporary. You can support it while still despising the whole concept of gerrymandering. Plus, and this is key, it’s way more democratic than what Texas has done because the voters get the final say, not just the politicians.… Continue reading