In a final warning, Henry Kissinger predicted Japan would pursue nuclear weapons. Kissinger, in a 2023 interview, estimated Japan would become a nuclear power within five years. Chinese experts share similar concerns, estimating Japan could develop such weapons in under three years, given their technical capabilities and political motivation. Furthermore, recent statements by Japanese officials hint at a potential shift in Japan’s non-nuclear principles, suggesting a growing interest in nuclear armament.
Read More
A source within Japan’s prime minister’s office suggested the country should consider possessing nuclear weapons, a departure from its long-held non-nuclear stance. The remarks, made by an individual involved in security policy under Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi, came amid discussions of reviewing Japan’s Three Non-Nuclear Principles. While acknowledging the need for nuclear arms, the source also recognized the impracticality of such a move. This follows the potential for backlash due to Japan’s history as the only nation to have suffered atomic bombings and its commitment to a world without nuclear weapons, enshrined in its pacifist postwar Constitution.
Read More
NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte issued a firm warning to Vladimir Putin, emphasizing that nuclear war is unwinnable and must be avoided. Rutte highlighted the credibility of NATO’s nuclear deterrence, particularly in response to Russia’s dangerous nuclear rhetoric, assuring populations of their safety. Furthermore, Rutte announced NATO has surpassed Russia in ammunition production, reversing the previous dynamic and accelerating deliveries. Finally, Rutte acknowledged that the security environment remains perilous, with Russia poised to remain a destabilizing force even after the end of its war in Ukraine.
Read More
In 2015, then-candidate Donald Trump demonstrated a lack of understanding of the US nuclear triad, a concerning detail given his subsequent presidency. Despite having served a full term and having access to intelligence briefings, Trump’s grasp of nuclear strategy remains questionable, according to former National Security Advisor John Bolton. Recent actions, such as redeploying nuclear submarines in response to social media threats from a senior Russian official, suggest a continued misunderstanding of nuclear deterrence principles and risk escalating tensions. This behavior, coupled with his past lack of knowledge, presents a troubling prospect for international stability, especially given the destructive power of these weapons.
Read More
Global nuclear arsenals are expanding, reversing decades of disarmament efforts, primarily due to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and its disregard for the Budapest Memorandum. This agreement, where Ukraine surrendered its nuclear weapons in exchange for security guarantees from world powers, proved ineffective, demonstrating the vulnerability of non-nuclear states reliant on others’ promises. Russia’s actions, including nuclear threats and the occupation of the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant, have eroded trust in the non-proliferation regime, leading to increased nuclear hedging by several nations. Consequently, the world faces escalating nuclear proliferation, driven by a breakdown in international security agreements and a loss of faith in the effectiveness of nuclear deterrence.
Read More
During a Vilnius visit establishing a new German brigade, Chancellor Merz underscored NATO’s unwavering commitment to the collective defense of its territory. He emphasized the alliance’s preparedness to respond to any challenge, stressing the gravity of the situation and the responsibilities of its members. The deployment of the brigade serves as a clear demonstration of this commitment. Merz’s statement reinforced a message of strong deterrence and resolute defense against any aggression.
Read More
The assertion that U.S. arms policy intentionally resulted in a stalemate in Ukraine is a complex one, with compelling arguments on both sides. The claim suggests a deliberate strategy of providing just enough weaponry to prolong the conflict, preventing a decisive victory for either side. This approach, while perhaps aiming to avoid wider geopolitical upheaval, is viewed by some as incredibly cruel, inflicting immense suffering on Ukraine.
The initial provision of limited weaponry, such as a small number of HIMARS rockets, is cited as evidence. It’s argued that the timing of supplying more advanced weaponry, like ATACMS missiles, only came after Russia had already fortified its airfields, essentially neutralizing the effectiveness of the aid.… Continue reading
Poland’s unwavering commitment to its strong relationship with the U.S. and NATO remains steadfast, despite concerns over shifting U.S. policy. This commitment is reflected in Poland’s substantial defense spending, already exceeding 4% of GDP and slated to reach 5%, fueled by significant arms purchases from both the U.S. and South Korea. However, recent U.S. actions regarding Ukraine, including potential reductions in aid and ambiguous statements on NATO obligations, pose significant challenges to Poland’s security architecture. Consequently, Poland is carefully evaluating the implications of these evolving circumstances on its national interests.
Read More
Poland’s consideration of nuclear weapons access is a direct response to the unfolding situation in Ukraine, a stark reminder that nuclear deterrence plays a significant role in preventing invasions. The perceived lack of such deterrence in Ukraine’s case, given its relinquishment of nuclear arsenal, has undoubtedly fueled this debate.
This situation, coupled with the actions of major global powers, has created a climate ripe for nuclear proliferation. The posturing and aggressive actions of nuclear-armed states embolden smaller nations to explore their own nuclear options as a way to safeguard their sovereignty and independence. The perceived threat of invasion from powerful neighbors, a reality for many countries, is a driving force in this consideration.… Continue reading
French President Macron proposed a strategic debate on utilizing France’s nuclear deterrent to safeguard European allies against Russian threats, prompting a strongly worded rebuke from Moscow. Poland and Baltic nations largely welcomed the proposal, viewing it as a significant step towards deterring future Russian aggression. Conversely, Russia denounced the suggestion as “extremely confrontational” and a threat. While Germany expressed reservations, preferring the existing NATO system, the discussion highlights concerns about potential U.S. disengagement and the need for alternative European security measures.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood