Appeals court throws out Trump’s $454 million civil fraud judgment.
Well, here we are, wrestling with another twist in the ongoing saga that is the legal battles surrounding Donald Trump. The Appeals Court has spoken, and the headline reads: the $454 million civil fraud judgment against Trump has been, essentially, tossed out. Now, before anyone starts cheering or throwing their hands up in despair, let’s break down what this actually *means*. The initial ruling found Trump, along with his sons and his business, guilty of a decade’s worth of business fraud. The court unequivocally stated that they had the intent to defraud.… Continue reading
Man accused of throwing sandwich at CBP agent in DC faces federal assault charges. Well, this is certainly a story that’s grabbed some attention. It seems we have a situation where a man, let’s call him… the Sandwich Slinger, allegedly chucked a sandwich at a Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agent in Washington, D.C., and now he’s facing federal assault charges. Talk about a case of “hold the mayo, hold the justice!”
The details, according to the accounts, are that after some sort of confrontation, the Sandwich Slinger apparently hurled a sandwich at the CBP agent, hitting him in the chest.… Continue reading
The author contends that the rule of law in the United States is functionally dead, primarily due to the Supreme Court’s unwillingness to apply legal standards to Donald Trump and his administration. This lack of adherence to consistent, repeatable rules undermines the predictability essential for a functioning legal system. The author argues that Trump’s ability to act and threaten without facing consequences, coupled with the expansion of lawlessness to those favored by him, exemplifies the erosion of the rule of law. The central premise is that the existing laws only matter if Trump chooses to abide by them. This renders the application of laws to be inconsistent and unreliable.
Read More
In a landmark French trial, Dominique Pelicot received a 20-year sentence for drugging and enabling the rape of his wife, Gisèle, by 46 other men over a decade. Forty-eight additional men were convicted of various sexual offenses, receiving sentences totaling over 400 years in prison. While Gisèle Pelicot, who waived her anonymity, expressed hope for a more respectful future, some critics deemed the sentences too lenient, highlighting ongoing challenges in France’s legal system regarding sexual assault cases. The trial is considered a watershed moment for women’s rights activism in the country.
Read More
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker