The White House has initiated a weekly tracker that identifies and critiques news stories deemed objectionable by the Trump administration, categorizing them as “lies” or “bias.” This “media offenders” page features a leaderboard of news outlets and a “hall of shame” highlighting specific stories and reporters. The administration’s move comes amid escalating tensions with the media, including legal battles and stricter rules for journalists at the Pentagon. Furthermore, President Trump has been criticized for making personal insults toward female reporters, adding a personal dimension to the ongoing conflict.
Read More
The House of Representatives voted overwhelmingly in favor of a bill on Tuesday compelling the Justice Department to release its files on Jeffrey Epstein. This decisive action followed months of effort to overcome opposition, including from former President Donald Trump and Republican leadership. Despite initial resistance, the bill garnered significant momentum, leading to its passage in the House and subsequent unanimous consent in the Senate. This legislative victory marks a crucial step in the pursuit of accountability for Epstein’s victims and scrutiny of law enforcement’s handling of the case.
Read More
Trump threatens ABC News broadcast license after reporter asks about Epstein, and it’s hard not to feel a sense of bewilderment. The idea of a president, any president, going after a news organization’s ability to broadcast because of a question asked about Jeffrey Epstein is, frankly, shocking. It’s the kind of thing you’d expect to see in a dictatorship, not a democracy that prides itself on freedom of the press and the First Amendment. It really does make you wonder: what is he so afraid of?
Trump threatens ABC News broadcast license after reporter asks about Epstein, and the comments online are certainly revealing.… Continue reading
ProPublica’s investigation into North Carolina Supreme Court Chief Justice Paul Newby, who allegedly politicized the state’s judicial system to favor Republicans, prompted a threatening response from the North Carolina Republican Party. The party’s communications director, Matt Mercer, warned ProPublica to drop the story, referencing connections with the Trump administration and suggesting repercussions. This act of intimidation highlights the GOP’s efforts to suppress unfavorable reporting, emphasizing the importance of investigative journalism. This case underscores a pattern of the GOP resorting to bullying tactics to prevent public scrutiny of their actions and governance model.
Read More
During the government shutdown, the Trump administration inappropriately used government resources, including websites and emails, to blame Democrats, even creating templates for federal workers to use. Despite these efforts, officials across the country, from airports to newsrooms, have pushed back against the administration’s actions. Airports nationwide refused to air a video from Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem blaming Democrats. The Pentagon’s new restrictions on journalists were also met with a united front of refusals from major news organizations across the ideological spectrum.
Read More
Numerous prominent news organizations, including The New York Times, The Washington Post, and CNN, have publicly rejected a new Pentagon policy. This policy mandates that media outlets pledge not to obtain unauthorized material and restricts access to certain areas without official accompaniment. The policy has sparked widespread criticism, with many outlets arguing it infringes on First Amendment rights and hinders the public’s ability to understand government operations. Pentagon officials claim the policy is necessary for national security, while some conservative outlets have embraced the new rules.
Read More
In Chicago, a federal judge has issued a temporary restraining order against the Trump administration, prohibiting the use of force against journalists covering anti-ICE protests. The order stems from a lawsuit filed by local journalists who accused federal agents of using tear gas and other weapons against them. The judge’s ruling prevents agents from dispersing, arresting, or threatening journalists, unless there is probable cause of a crime. While authorities can order journalists to move, they must provide ample time and opportunity for them to report and observe. The order will remain in effect for two weeks as the legal proceedings continue.
Read More
In response to Ukraine’s ban on several Hungarian media outlets, the Hungarian government has prohibited access to a selection of Ukrainian news websites, including Ukrainska Pravda and European Pravda. According to Minister Gergely Gulyás, this decision is based on the principle of reciprocity, following Ukraine’s actions against Hungarian media, which were accused of disseminating Russian propaganda. Gulyás stated that Ukraine’s actions were prompted by critical reporting on sanctions against Russia and military support for Ukraine, as well as the depiction of the EU and NATO. This decision mirrors Russia’s prior bans on Hungarian media, raising questions about press freedom and political tensions in the region.
Read More
President Trump has recently intensified his criticism of press freedom and the First Amendment. During a recent statement, he suggested that negative coverage of his administration by journalists should be illegal. These comments follow the indefinite suspension of Jimmy Kimmel’s program by ABC, owned by Disney, after threats were made regarding the revocation of broadcast licenses. In response, writers and actors gathered in protest to defend free speech.
Read More
Australian Broadcasting Corporation blocked from UK press conference after clash with Trump. This is the headline that paints a pretty clear picture, doesn’t it? It feels like we’ve stumbled into a movie plot, one where the lines between reality and a dystopian future are getting awfully blurry. We’re talking about a situation where a respected journalist, John Lyons from the ABC, dared to ask a question, a very reasonable question, about wealth accumulation. The answer? Well, instead of a cogent response, the response involved accusations of “hurting Australia” and a threat to tattle on the journalist to his Prime Minister. Seriously?… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood