Following a planned Black Mass inside the Kansas Statehouse, Michael Stewart, leader of the Satanic Grotto, and three others were arrested. The event, intended as a protest for religious freedom and against perceived state favoritism towards Christianity, sparked a large counter-protest from Christian groups. A scuffle ensued when attendees attempted to stop the ceremony, resulting in arrests for disorderly conduct and unlawful assembly on both sides. Governor Kelly’s temporary ban on indoor protests, enacted following pressure from Catholic groups, was in effect at the time of the incident. Stewart was released on bond, while the status of other arrestees varied.
Read More
Rumeysa Ozturk, a Turkish PhD student at Tufts University, was abducted by masked agents and subsequently rendered to a Louisiana detention center. Her “crime” was co-authoring a student op-ed criticizing her university’s stance on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict a year prior. This incident represents a chilling escalation of government overreach, targeting individuals for their political expression without due process. The Trump administration’s actions, including similar renditions of others, constitute a grave threat to freedom of speech and personal liberty on college campuses and beyond. This blatant disregard for fundamental rights demands immediate action and widespread condemnation.
Read More
A French researcher, employed by the CNRS, was denied entry to the United States and subsequently deported. American authorities cited messages on his phone expressing opinions critical of the Trump administration’s research policies as the reason for denial, classifying the opinions as “hateful” and even “terrorism.” The French government, while acknowledging US sovereignty over entry, deplores the incident, emphasizing the importance of freedom of opinion and academic freedom. Following an FBI investigation, charges were dropped.
Read More
A bill recently introduced in the Minnesota legislature proposes that expressing intense verbal hostility toward President Donald J. Trump constitutes “Trump Derangement Syndrome,” a serious mental illness requiring immediate intervention. This is a truly astonishing proposition, suggesting a chilling precedent for suppressing dissent and freedom of expression.
The very idea that strong negative opinions about a political figure should be classified as a mental disorder is deeply concerning. It smacks of authoritarian regimes that historically used psychiatric diagnoses to silence critics and political opponents. The proposed bill’s authors seemingly fail to grasp the fundamental principles of free speech and the right to express one’s political views, however vehemently.… Continue reading
CBS must defend our free press, not settle Trump’s $20 billion lawsuit. This isn’t just about a massive payout; it’s about the very principle of a free and independent press. To settle would set a dangerous precedent, emboldening powerful figures to silence dissent through financial intimidation. It would signal to other potential litigants that such tactics work, chilling free speech across the media landscape.
CBS’s potential capitulation isn’t simply a matter of cost-benefit analysis. While the financial implications of a protracted legal battle are undeniable, the far greater cost lies in the damage to the credibility and independence of the press.… Continue reading
Democratic Congressman Maxwell Frost found himself facing repercussions for referring to Donald Trump as the “grifter in chief” during a House committee meeting. This incident highlights a clash between the freedom of speech and the rules governing decorum within the House of Representatives.
The situation unfolded during a Republican-led House Oversight and Government Reform Committee meeting. Congressman Frost, in expressing his views on the committee’s investigative priorities, allegedly used the term “grifter in chief” when referring to the former president. This prompted immediate objections from Republican members who claimed that such language violated House rules prohibiting disparaging remarks about the president.… Continue reading
During a town hall meeting in Coeur d’Alene, Idaho, former Democratic candidate Teresa Borrenpohl was forcibly removed after speaking out. Plainclothes officers, possibly working for Sheriff Robert Norris, apprehended Borrenpohl following verbal instructions from the event’s emcee. The removal, met with mixed reactions from the audience, escalated into a physical altercation as Borrenpohl resisted. This incident represents a concerning escalation of political tension, mirroring recent disruptions at other political events nationwide.
Read More
A heated town hall meeting in Kootenai County, Idaho, devolved into chaos when a woman, Teresa Borrenpohl, was forcibly removed for voicing concerns about Medicaid expansion. Sheriff Bob Norris ordered her removal after she refused to stop speaking, leading to a physical altercation and subsequent outrage from the audience. The incident, captured on video, sparked criticism for its suppression of dissent and raised concerns about the curtailment of First Amendment rights. The Idaho Democratic Party condemned the event, highlighting the importance of open dialogue and respectful discourse in a democratic society.
Read More
A town hall meeting hosted by the Kootenai County Republican Central Committee devolved into chaos when attendee Teresa Borrenpohl was forcibly removed after voicing concerns about proposed legislation. Sheriff Bob Norris ordered Borrenpohl’s removal, and unidentified men physically dragged her from the auditorium following her refusal to leave. The incident, marked by the emcee’s dismissive remarks and audience outrage, highlighted growing political divisiveness in the community. Many attendees expressed dismay at the handling of the situation.
Read More
A Moscow court levied a 3.8 million ruble ($41,530) fine against Google for YouTube content providing instructions on surrendering to Ukrainian forces. This penalty follows Russia’s ongoing practice of fining foreign tech platforms for allegedly illegal content related to the Ukraine conflict. The fine comes amidst accusations by critics that Russia is intentionally throttling YouTube speeds to suppress dissenting viewpoints. Google has yet to publicly respond to the ruling and denies Russia’s claims of equipment failures causing the speed issues.
Read More