Pete Buttigieg goes viral for predicting Trump’s free speech crackdown. The core of the viral moment revolves around a clip from Buttigieg during last year’s presidential campaign. In the clip, he warned that free speech would be under threat in the US, specifically because Trump had expressed intentions to punish media outlets for their coverage. This, as many point out, is a fairly straightforward prediction considering Trump’s well-documented history of antagonism towards the media.
It’s worth noting that the response to Buttigieg’s “prediction” is varied. Some acknowledge the obvious nature of the forecast, given Trump’s established patterns. Others frame it less as a profound insight and more as an observation that anyone paying attention could have made.… Continue reading
The recent indefinite suspension of Jimmy Kimmel due to remarks about Charlie Kirk highlights a concerning trend of stifled free speech, mirroring tactics once employed by the left. This “woke” right, led by figures like Donald Trump and J.D. Vance, is attempting to silence dissent, often using the same justification previously used by social justice activists. Unlike past crackdowns, this effort lacks widespread support and a clear mandate, relying instead on fear and intimidation. Ultimately, this MAGA-driven cultural control is doomed to fail, as it lacks the cultural backing of previous periods of moral panic, and the First Amendment will continue to be challenged but never destroyed.
Read More
During a press conference, President Trump asserted that negative media coverage of him is “really illegal,” arguing that it constitutes cheating rather than free speech. He cited the high percentage of unfavorable stories about him as evidence of unfair treatment by news outlets, likening them to extensions of the Democratic National Committee. This stance follows the administration’s crackdown on free speech in the wake of conservative activist Charlie Kirk’s death, which has drawn criticism from both liberals and some conservatives, including former President Barack Obama and Senator Ted Cruz. The administration’s actions include the firing of an MSNBC analyst and the indefinite pulling of Jimmy Kimmel’s late-night show, after pressure from the FCC chairman.
Read More
Senator Ted Cruz criticized FCC Chairman Brendan Carr for comments regarding Jimmy Kimmel’s remarks, likening them to threats against ABC’s broadcasting licenses. Cruz, despite disliking Kimmel’s comments, expressed concern that such actions set a dangerous precedent for government censorship, potentially targeting conservatives in the future. He stated that allowing the government to police speech would inevitably lead to the suppression of opposing viewpoints. The situation has also garnered responses from other politicians, including criticism from Democrats and defenses from Republicans, with varying perspectives on the issue of free speech and the FCC’s role.
Read More
Disney is facing boycott calls after suspending Jimmy Kimmel, allegedly due to pressure from the Trump-appointed FCC chairman. Progressive groups like Indivisible are urging subscribers to cancel Disney services and contact the company to express disapproval. They are also lobbying for a congressional investigation into the FCC chairman’s actions, while some members of congress are attempting to force him to testify. Furthermore, former Disney CEO Michael Eisner has criticized the company’s decision, viewing it as a result of intimidation and self-interest.
Read More
Former Disney CEO Michael Eisner has publicly criticized the company’s decision to suspend Jimmy Kimmel’s show on ABC, owned by Disney. Eisner, who served as CEO from 1984 to 2005, expressed his disapproval of the indefinite suspension, linking it to the FCC Chairman’s threats against ABC. The decision followed Kimmel’s comments about the Charlie Kirk assassination, which sparked controversy. Eisner’s remarks and those of other prominent figures, including celebrities and former late-night hosts, come in the wake of FCC threats and raise concerns about free speech and corporate interests within the media landscape.
Read More
President Trump defended FCC Chair Brendan Carr, despite Senator Ted Cruz’s criticism of Carr’s actions regarding the suspension of Jimmy Kimmel. Cruz denounced Carr’s actions, warning that they set a dangerous precedent for suppressing free speech. Trump disagreed with Cruz and stated Carr was a patriot taking on networks that criticized him. The controversy arose after Kimmel’s comments about a conservative activist’s murder, which led Carr to threaten ABC’s broadcast license.
Read More
In a significant turn of events, the White House Peace Vigil, a decades-long act of political protest, was dismantled by federal law enforcement. The removal of the vigil, which was the longest continuous act of protest in U.S. history, came after President Trump requested its removal due to concerns about aesthetics and safety. Demonstrators reported that they were given little warning before the protest was dismantled, with authorities citing violations of park regulations. Activists and volunteers expressed concerns over the attack, especially after its direct order from the president.
Read More
Trump: ‘It’s no longer free speech.’ This statement, echoing a sentiment of frustration, seems to be the core of the matter here. It’s a striking claim, especially coming from a figure who often champions himself as a defender of free speech. The idea is that if the majority of media coverage is critical, it somehow ceases to be legitimate speech. The context reveals that Trump was likely referring to the perceived negative portrayal of his actions and decisions, as if the abundance of negative stories somehow negates the very principle of free expression.
This raises a multitude of questions. Does the volume of negative reporting, regardless of its accuracy or validity, invalidate the right to report?… Continue reading
Ted Cruz: MAGA “will regret” what it did to Jimmy Kimmel
Ted Cruz, in an unexpected twist, seems to be aligning himself with a viewpoint that many people, myself included, find themselves surprisingly agreeing with: that the actions taken against Jimmy Kimmel by some within the MAGA movement were a step too far. This is not a straightforward endorsement of Kimmel, nor is it an abandonment of Cruz’s core political affiliations. Instead, it’s a recognition of a dangerous precedent. It’s a statement that resonates with the fundamental principles of free speech and the potential for a backlash when those principles are violated.… Continue reading
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker