In a significant turn of events, the White House Peace Vigil, a decades-long act of political protest, was dismantled by federal law enforcement. The removal of the vigil, which was the longest continuous act of protest in U.S. history, came after President Trump requested its removal due to concerns about aesthetics and safety. Demonstrators reported that they were given little warning before the protest was dismantled, with authorities citing violations of park regulations. Activists and volunteers expressed concerns over the attack, especially after its direct order from the president.
Read More
Trump: ‘It’s no longer free speech.’ This statement, echoing a sentiment of frustration, seems to be the core of the matter here. It’s a striking claim, especially coming from a figure who often champions himself as a defender of free speech. The idea is that if the majority of media coverage is critical, it somehow ceases to be legitimate speech. The context reveals that Trump was likely referring to the perceived negative portrayal of his actions and decisions, as if the abundance of negative stories somehow negates the very principle of free expression.
This raises a multitude of questions. Does the volume of negative reporting, regardless of its accuracy or validity, invalidate the right to report?… Continue reading
Ted Cruz: MAGA “will regret” what it did to Jimmy Kimmel
Ted Cruz, in an unexpected twist, seems to be aligning himself with a viewpoint that many people, myself included, find themselves surprisingly agreeing with: that the actions taken against Jimmy Kimmel by some within the MAGA movement were a step too far. This is not a straightforward endorsement of Kimmel, nor is it an abandonment of Cruz’s core political affiliations. Instead, it’s a recognition of a dangerous precedent. It’s a statement that resonates with the fundamental principles of free speech and the potential for a backlash when those principles are violated.… Continue reading
Nobel laureate Maria Ressa has drawn parallels between the erosion of US institutions under the Trump administration and the political climate in her home country, the Philippines, warning Americans against complacency in defending their rights. Ressa highlighted the speed at which these changes occurred, especially after the indefinite suspension of Jimmy Kimmel. She noted the manipulation of public information as a key tactic used by illiberal leaders, and emphasized the existence of a “dictator’s playbook.” Ressa advocates for continuing the work of holding leaders accountable, drawing on her own experiences.
Read More
Senator Ted Cruz criticized FCC chair Brendan Carr for his remarks regarding Jimmy Kimmel’s comments on Charlie Kirk, comparing Carr’s warning to ABC to a mafia threat. Although Cruz disagreed with Kimmel’s statements, he condemned the government’s potential censorship of speech, warning it sets a dangerous precedent. The senator expressed concern that such actions could be used against conservatives by future Democratic administrations. This followed Kimmel’s show being taken off the air, causing growing discomfort among Republicans, with some voices across the political spectrum raising First Amendment concerns.
Read More
Senator Cynthia Lummis of Wyoming stated that the First Amendment may no longer be the “ultimate right” in America, sparking debate over free speech. These comments followed the indefinite suspension of Jimmy Kimmel’s late-night show after controversial remarks concerning Charlie Kirk and his subsequent murder. This situation has ignited a broader national conversation, particularly regarding the line between free speech and hate speech, and the role of the government in regulating media. While opinions vary widely, from support for Kimmel’s suspension to concerns over censorship, the FCC Chairman has hinted at further actions, indicating the debate is far from settled.
Read More
In his second inaugural address, the former president signed an executive order aimed at stopping government censorship and restoring free speech, framing it as a response to previous federal overreach. The order emphasized the right to free expression without government interference and condemned government censorship. However, this action appears hypocritical as numerous examples contradict the order, including instances of a federal agency pushing a comedian off the air and government officials threatening repercussions for speech deemed objectionable, suggesting an actual curtailment of free speech. The examples reveal a concerning pattern of restricting expression that conflicts directly with the stated policy.
Read More
In pressuring ABC over Kimmel, Trump may have crossed a constitutional line. Let’s just get this straight from the get-go: it’s not a “may have,” it’s a “did.” The evidence is there, the implications are clear. The First Amendment is pretty clear about the government not being allowed to mess with free speech, and pressuring a broadcaster because of what someone said on air? That’s a textbook violation. The problem is, we’ve seen this play out before, again and again. And, let’s be honest, nothing much happens.
It’s a frustrating pattern. This isn’t a single incident; it’s a part of a larger trend.… Continue reading
Former vice presidential candidate Tim Walz criticized Donald Trump’s actions, comparing them to North Korea’s approach to free speech. He made these comments during an appearance on MSNBC, referencing ABC’s decision to pull “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” following pressure from the administration. Walz condemned Trump’s actions, which he sees as an attack on democracy, and mentioned specific instances, including the murder of a Minnesota House Representative and comments made on Fox News. Walz emphasized the importance of defending democracy, particularly in light of Trump’s alleged restrictions on free speech and criticism.
Read More
Trump’s war against late-night talk shows is escalating, with ABC pulling Jimmy Kimmel’s show off the air indefinitely following Kimmel’s criticism of right-wing reactions to an assassination. The decision, influenced by threats from the Federal Communications Commission chairman, Brendan Carr, and potential regulatory repercussions, highlights corporate cowardice. This event is a part of a broader attack on free speech and the fear of financial harm stemming from Trump’s potential retaliation. The author posits that this repression extends beyond late-night shows and calls for opposition to defend free speech.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood