The independently financed film “The Apprentice,” a Donald Trump origin story, has been largely ignored by Hollywood despite positive reviews and its timely relevance. Stars Jeremy Strong and Sebastian Stan, who play Roy Cohn and Trump respectively, have criticized their colleagues for shunning the film, citing concerns about free speech and the industry’s selective engagement with political issues. This silence contrasts sharply with Hollywood’s vocal opposition to Trump during previous elections, suggesting a potential shift in the industry’s approach to political activism or a recognition of its diminishing influence. The film’s reception reflects a broader trend of Hollywood’s reduced political engagement since Trump’s election, leaving some to question whether this is a temporary lull or a more permanent change.
Read More
The Supreme Court will hear *Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton*, a case concerning a Texas law requiring age verification for online pornography. This law is nearly identical to a federal law struck down in *Ashcroft v. ACLU*, which the Fifth Circuit Court defied by upholding the Texas law despite the precedent. While Texas argues for modifying First Amendment protections regarding pornography, it also suggests the existence of privacy-preserving age-verification technology that could justify such laws. A ruling could either reaffirm existing precedents or significantly alter the balance between protecting minors and adult access to sexual content.
Read More
Laura Loomer, a prominent Trump ally, recently voiced a surprising observation about Elon Musk: nobody wants to cross him. This statement, seemingly simple on the surface, reveals a complex interplay of power, money, and influence within the current political landscape. It highlights the perceived invincibility of a tech billionaire who wields considerable control over a major communication platform.
Loomer’s comment implicitly acknowledges Musk’s immense power. The implication is that fear of retaliation, perhaps in the form of censorship or other forms of reprisal, prevents individuals and even powerful groups from openly challenging him. This suggests a chilling effect on dissent and free speech, ironically coming from a person who often champions those very ideals.… Continue reading
Elon Musk’s recent request for more “positive” content on X was met with widespread criticism, with users labeling him a hypocrite for his own inflammatory posts. These posts include endorsing the far-right AfD party in Germany and using profanity towards critics. Musk’s actions contrast sharply with his demand, particularly given analysis suggesting he artificially boosted pro-Trump content on the platform. This controversy highlights the ongoing tension between Musk’s stated goals for X and his actual actions on the platform.
Read More
Elon Musk’s op-ed in Germany’s *Welt am Sonntag* supporting the far-right AfD party sparked controversy, resulting in the opinion editor’s resignation. Musk’s commentary, his second endorsement of the AfD this month, characterized the party as Germany’s last hope for economic prosperity and cultural integrity. This action fueled a debate regarding free speech in German media, with internal criticism published alongside Musk’s piece. Despite the controversy, the *Welt* group’s leadership affirmed its commitment to free expression as a cornerstone of journalism.
Read More
This article lacks the content needed for summarization. The provided text only shows a photo credit and a call to action for tips. No article content is present to summarize.
Read More
Elon Musk published a pro-AfD opinion piece in Germany’s *Welt am Sonntag*, prompting the opinion editor’s resignation. Musk’s commentary, which downplayed the AfD’s extremism, follows his prior social media endorsement of the party. The newspaper’s editor-in-chief and publisher responded, acknowledging freedom of speech while criticizing Musk’s proposed solution. This event occurs ahead of Germany’s February election, where the AfD’s strong showing could impact coalition possibilities.
Read More
A debate within the MAGA sphere regarding H-1B visas has intensified, with Elon Musk facing accusations of retaliating against critics of his pro-H-1B stance on X. Musk, defending the program’s necessity for attracting top engineering talent, has clashed with prominent Trump supporters like Laura Loomer and Matt Gaetz who oppose the visas. In response to this criticism, Musk reportedly revoked verification badges from numerous accounts associated with a conservative PAC, prompting accusations of censorship and hypocrisy. The conflict highlights a significant division within the conservative movement over immigration policy and the role of big tech.
Read More
Following accusations of censorship, at least 14 conservative accounts on X, many affiliated with ConservativeOG, reported losing premium features after criticizing Elon Musk’s immigration stance. These accounts, including prominent figures like Laura Loomer and Ryan Fournier, lost monetization capabilities and blue verification, despite remaining active. Musk attributed the issue to an algorithm reducing reach based on user blocks, a claim met with further accusations of shadowbanning. This incident occurred amidst a heated debate surrounding President-elect Trump’s immigration policy and increased scrutiny of Musk’s pro-immigration views within the MAGA sphere.
Read More
Elon Musk’s public support for the H-1B visa program and skilled immigration ignited a conflict with MAGA-aligned conservatives on X. This clash, escalating tensions already simmering for months, resulted in several prominent right-wing figures losing their verification badges and facing account restrictions. Critics accused Musk of hypocrisy, alleging retaliation for their vocal opposition to his immigration stance. Musk, while not directly addressing the accusations, hinted at measures against coordinated attacks, fueling further controversy.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood