On the third anniversary of Russia’s invasion, the UN General Assembly rejected a U.S.-proposed resolution for ending the war that omitted mention of Russian aggression, instead approving a Ukrainian resolution demanding Russia’s immediate withdrawal. While the Ukrainian resolution passed, support was lower than in previous votes, highlighting diminished international backing. The U.S. abstained from voting on the amended version of its own resolution, reflecting tensions between the U.S. and Ukraine stemming from recent diplomatic initiatives. This outcome underscores the ongoing divisions within the international community regarding the conflict and the challenges in achieving a peaceful resolution.
Read More
The United States’ vote against a UN resolution condemning Russia’s aggression in Ukraine is a startling development, prompting widespread international condemnation and raising serious questions about the future of US foreign policy. The resolution, which overwhelmingly passed with 93 countries voting in favor and only 18 against, called for the return of occupied Ukrainian territories. This US stance places it alongside Russia, Belarus, and a number of other countries widely considered pro-Moscow, a grouping that seems profoundly at odds with traditional US alliances and values.
This decision is being described as a dramatic shift in US foreign policy, a 180-degree turn that some observers characterize as a betrayal of long-standing commitments to international norms and the defense of democratic principles.… Continue reading
Readers are encouraged to submit news tips to The Daily Beast. The submission process is straightforward and confidential. Tips can be submitted through a designated online portal. This allows readers to contribute to the publication’s investigative journalism.
Read More
The UK will announce its largest sanctions package against Russia since the war began, targeting the military and revenue streams fueling the conflict in Ukraine. This action, spearheaded by Foreign Secretary David Lammy, coincides with the war’s third anniversary and underscores a continued commitment to supporting Ukraine. The sanctions announcement also includes a pledge of £3 billion in annual aid to Kyiv and the possibility of deploying UK troops for peacekeeping. These measures come as the US, under President Trump, shifts its position on the war, prompting UK efforts to maintain a united European front.
Read More
The US is actively working to thwart a Ukrainian-led UN resolution explicitly condemning Russia’s aggressive war. This move has stunned many international partners, who expected the US to continue its previous support for resolutions affirming Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity.
Instead, the US administration is pushing for its own alternative text, ostensibly focused on achieving peace between Kyiv and Moscow. This proposed resolution, however, noticeably omits any mention of core principles like Ukrainian sovereignty and the accountability of the aggressor nation, Russia. This omission is raising serious concerns among allies who believe genuine peace cannot be achieved without acknowledging these fundamental principles.… Continue reading
A significant lithium deposit in central Ukraine, near the abandoned village of Liodiane, holds the potential for substantial economic benefit, with an estimated daily extraction capacity of 4,300 tonnes. However, development is stalled due to ongoing conflict and a controversial demand by the former US president for a significant share of Ukraine’s mineral wealth as payment for prior military aid. Ukrainian officials have rejected this demand, emphasizing the need for security guarantees before any deals involving their national resources are considered. The mine’s development, projected to cost $350 million, is contingent on the end of the war and securing international investment.
Read More
The assertion that Donald Trump is “not well informed” about the Ukraine war, as reportedly stated by a Dutch Defense Minister, sparks a multifaceted discussion. It’s not simply a matter of lacking knowledge; the issue goes far deeper. Some believe his ignorance is feigned, a deliberate tactic to deflect responsibility or to align himself with certain narratives.
The idea that Trump’s lack of knowledge is intentional is a compelling one. Perhaps he chooses to remain uninformed, or perhaps he simply doesn’t care about the complexities of the conflict. This lack of concern, if true, might stem from a broader disinterest in international affairs, or it might be a strategic move to avoid contradicting his political allies or narratives.… Continue reading
The US government’s potential decision to cut off Ukraine’s access to Starlink internet services in exchange for minerals feels like a dramatic shift in strategy. One moment, unwavering support is pledged, the next, vital services are dangled as leverage in a seemingly transactional power play. This abrupt change leaves many questioning the underlying motives and the ethical implications of such a drastic move.
The suggestion that the US would condition continued support on Ukraine supplying minerals evokes strong reactions. It appears to many as blatant blackmail, reminiscent of outdated geopolitical tactics. The perception that a country, particularly one facing ongoing conflict, could be subjected to such pressure raises serious concerns about the potential for coercion and exploitation.… Continue reading
The United States’ objection to labeling Russia as the “aggressor” in a G7 statement regarding the invasion of Ukraine is a deeply troubling development. This refusal to use straightforward, accurate language regarding the situation speaks volumes about the current state of US foreign policy and its relationship with global alliances. The blatant disregard for established facts undermines the credibility of the United States on the world stage and fuels a dangerous narrative that actively aids Russia’s aggression.
The implications of this stance are far-reaching and alarming. By refusing to acknowledge Russia’s role as the aggressor, the US weakens the international condemnation of the invasion, emboldening Putin and potentially encouraging further acts of aggression.… Continue reading
War-hardened Ukrainians, having endured years of brutal conflict, remain steadfastly defiant in the face of challenges posed by the current US administration. Their resilience is striking, born from the crucible of war and fueled by a determination to defend their sovereignty. The contrast between promises of allyship in 1994 and the current political climate underscores the profound shifts in global dynamics.
The situation is complex, however. While the economic strain on Russia is evident, and its military capacity is being tested by Ukraine’s tenacious resistance and the superior logistics of NATO allies, the influence of the US remains significant. Despite not having boots on the ground, US support has been crucial.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood