fragile masculinity

Men Who Wage War To Prove Manhood Are Cowards

Throughout history, virtuous citizenship has been narrowly defined by military life, associating a specifically masculine heritage of violence with national defense and authority. This perspective often overlooks or prioritizes military pursuits over crucial areas like health and education, assuming “real” politics is solely a male domain and that male worth is intrinsically linked to bloodshed and authoritarian leadership. This historical trend, articulated through studies of Western countries, reveals how hegemonic masculinity has been used to orchestrate global dominance and oppress women, a pattern that continues to manifest in overt sexism and subtle exclusions, even as women’s rights are sometimes cynically invoked to justify harmful actions. The current era sees reactionary commentators actively valorizing hypermasculinity, using war as an opportunity to advance a domestic agenda of male power and denouncing queerness and feminism, all while overlooking the underlying anxieties and doubts that plague actual existing masculinity.

Read More

Hegseth’s Fragile Masculinity Dooms America

This article posits that the US position on Iran is rooted in machismo rather than strategic calculation, driven by a hard-right ideology that equates masculinity with power. This perspective prioritizes perceived strength and dismisses nuanced planning and diplomacy, as exemplified by figures like Pete Hegseth. The article argues that this approach has led to functional failures, as Iran’s patient and prepared retaliatory strategy has effectively countered the US’s impulsive actions, demonstrating that thuggishness and machismo ultimately lead to weakness.

Read More