Tulsi Gabbard’s nomination as Director of National Intelligence is highly controversial due to her history of promoting Russian propaganda and supporting authoritarian regimes. Her past actions, including questioning the source of Syrian airstrikes that injured children and defending Assad’s regime, demonstrate a troubling lack of objectivity and empathy. Experts express concerns about her susceptibility to disinformation and her potential to undermine US intelligence credibility with allies. These concerns, coupled with questions about her meeting the required “extensive national security expertise” for the DNI position, raise serious doubts about her suitability for the role.
Read More
President-elect Trump’s transition team has not signed the required Presidential Transition Act agreement, thus circumventing fundraising limits and disclosure requirements. This lack of transparency allows undisclosed donors, potentially including foreign nationals, to contribute to the transition effort without public scrutiny. This action is unprecedented and raises concerns about potential conflicts of interest and financial corruption, hindering the incoming administration’s ability to govern effectively. Several members of Congress have voiced strong concerns, highlighting the risks to national security and democratic governance.
Read More
Donald Trump’s 2025 transition team is defying ethics laws and norms by accepting undisclosed donations, bypassing mandated ethics pledges and plans, and refusing FBI background checks on nominees. This disregard for established procedures has prompted criticism, with concerns raised about foreign influence and conflicts of interest. The team’s actions undermine the purpose of presidential transition laws and raise serious questions regarding transparency and accountability. Furthermore, the lack of thorough vetting of nominees, including those facing serious allegations of misconduct, exacerbates these concerns.
Read More
Trump’s transition team is reportedly operating on secret funds, a fact that raises significant ethical concerns. The sheer scale of the secrecy surrounding the financing of this crucial period is alarming, suggesting a deliberate attempt to obscure the source and nature of the funding. This opacity naturally invites speculation about the potential influence of undisclosed donors and their motivations.
The notion that this isn’t Trump’s own money is widely believed. The scale of his past financial dealings, and the overall extravagance of his lifestyle, points away from a reliance on personal funds for such an undertaking. This leads to questions about who might be funding this operation, and what they might expect in return.… Continue reading
In the wake of Trump’s electoral victory, Russian President Putin has engaged in psychological warfare, attempting to influence the incoming president. Putin’s delayed congratulatory message and subsequent denial of a phone conversation with Trump raise questions about the true nature of their relationship. Furthermore, a statement from Russia’s intelligence chief, Nikolai Patrushev, suggests Russia’s involvement in swaying the election, hinting at a potential blackmail scheme. This incident, coupled with Trump’s history of aligning with Putin’s interests, raises concerns about the potential for Russia’s influence on American foreign policy. Whether Trump will recognize Putin’s manipulation remains to be seen, but his past actions suggest a susceptibility to Putin’s tactics.
Read More
Russian actors made a fake video depicting mail-in ballots for Trump being destroyed, and it feels like yet another chapter in the ongoing saga of how foreign influence continues to manipulate American politics. The mere existence of such a video—showing an individual going through what looked like ballots and apparently tearing up those marked for Trump—manages to encapsulate many of my frustrations and fears regarding the modern electoral process in the United States. The sensationalism embedded in this production not only aims to mislead viewers but also actively plays into the existing tensions and divisions in our society.
This video is insidious for its choice of an actor—a Black individual with a foreign accent—deliberately designed to stoke racial and societal fears.… Continue reading
Elon Musk has been in regular contact with Vladimir Putin for two years, according to a recent report. This revelation isn’t just startling; it spirals into a realm of implications that feels almost dystopian. The notion that a private citizen, albeit an immensely powerful one, has been engaging with a foreign leader whose actions are often at odds with American interests raises profound questions about national security and the ethical boundaries of business.
The timing of these conversations is particularly unsettling. Just as Russia was initiating its invasion of Ukraine, Musk was reportedly cozying up to the Kremlin. This should not be seen as a mere coincidence but rather as a strategic move within a much larger geopolitical game.… Continue reading
As a Canadian citizen, I find the recent events surrounding the violation of our country’s sovereignty by India deeply troubling. The idea that a foreign government would have the audacity to carry out an assassination plot on Canadian soil is not only shocking but completely unacceptable. Our nation prides itself on upholding the rule of law and respecting the rights and freedoms of all individuals within our borders. To have these principles violated in such a brazen manner is a grave concern that cannot be overlooked.
It is clear that India’s actions in this matter cannot be dismissed as a simple mistake.… Continue reading
The recent decision by TikTok to remove Russian state media outlets RT and Sputnik from its platform due to “covert influence operations” is quite interesting, to say the least. I mean, let’s be real, it’s not exactly a secret that these outlets have been pushing Russian propaganda for quite some time. The fact that they’re finally being called out on it is definitely a step in the right direction.
But here’s the thing – what about all the influencers they fund to spread their BS? It’s not just about RT and Sputnik, but also the individuals who are essentially puppets pushing this propaganda.… Continue reading
I can’t help but feel a sense of vindication as I reflect on the recent news that a pro-Trump media firm abruptly folded after their Russia scheme was exposed. For years, I have been sounding the alarm, pointing out the blatant ties to Russian propaganda that seemed to permeate every aspect of their content. From the glowing praise of Putin to the constant stream of pro-Russia talking points, it was evident that there was something deeply troubling at play.
The fact that individuals like Tim Pool and Ben Johnson were receiving hefty sums of money from a foreign government to push a specific agenda is not only disturbing but also a clear betrayal of the principles of journalism and democracy.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood