Forced arbitration

Uber terms mean couple can’t sue after ‘life-changing’ crash

I can’t help but feel an overwhelming sense of frustration and disillusionment as I read about a couple who were involved in a ‘life-changing’ crash with an Uber driver, only to find out they cannot sue Uber due to the terms and conditions they unknowingly agreed upon. It’s disheartening to see how companies like Uber and Uber Eats embed forced arbitration clauses into their terms of service, essentially shielding themselves from legal repercussions in cases of serious accidents.

Forced arbitration has become a convenient shield for big companies to escape the scrutiny of a public trial, leaving individuals at a significant disadvantage.… Continue reading

Disney+ terms prevent allergy death lawsuit, Disney says

Disney’s recent attempt to invoke its terms of use to prevent a lawsuit concerning a tragic allergy-related death is a blatant display of corporate greed and insensitivity. The fact that they would try to shield themselves from accountability in such a heart-wrenching situation is despicable. The argument that by merely signing up for Disney+ or purchasing theme park tickets, individuals waive their right to a jury trial is preposterous. It is a clear abuse of power and an attempt to evade responsibility.

The case of Dr. Kanokporn Tangsuan’s death due to severe allergies at a restaurant in Disney Springs, a third-party operated venue, is indeed tragic, but it is Disney’s response that is truly appalling.… Continue reading