President Trump announced that Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits will be withheld until Democrats agree to reopen the government, reversing the USDA’s prior commitment to distribute at least partial benefits. This decision, conveyed via a Truth Social post, contradicts a court order and potentially impacts over 22 million households that rely on SNAP. The USDA, which administers SNAP, had previously stated its ability to provide reduced benefits, but the president’s stance adds further uncertainty to the ongoing government shutdown. Trump attributed the higher SNAP spending to the previous administration.
Read More
The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits are set to expire on November 1st due to the ongoing government shutdown. Congressman Clay Higgins criticized SNAP recipients, suggesting they should have stockpiled food and should not be receiving benefits if they have not done so. The government shutdown began after the Senate failed to pass a Republican-sponsored funding bill, with Democrats unwilling to support any bill without an extension of healthcare premium subsidies. While a bill to fund SNAP beyond November 1st has been introduced by a Republican Senator and has support from Democrats, Republican leadership has not indicated it will bring the bill to the floor for a vote.
Read More
Nearly 42 million Americans losing their food stamp benefits is a stark reality check on the economic health of the United States. We’re talking about a massive number of people, nearly the population of a small country, who rely on this essential support to put food on the table. The sheer scale of this situation is difficult to grasp, especially when juxtaposed with the fact that we’re a nation boasting an extraordinary number of billionaires. It makes you question the priorities, doesn’t it?
It’s infuriating to consider that a significant number of these individuals, the ones who are about to lose these benefits, are actually working jobs.… Continue reading
Federal judges ruled that the Trump administration must utilize emergency funds to partially cover food stamp benefits for millions of Americans in November. The rulings rejected the USDA’s claim that it couldn’t use the contingency fund, which holds billions, to cover benefits amid the government shutdown. While the orders won’t cover all payments, both judges, appointed by former President Barack Obama, also stated that the USDA may tap into a larger fund to pay November SNAP benefits in full. However, millions of recipients will still experience delays in receiving their benefits due to the administrative hurdles involved.
Read More
A federal judge in Rhode Island blocked the Trump administration from cutting off SNAP benefits for 42 million Americans during the government shutdown. The judge ordered the administration to pay food stamp benefits “as soon as possible” after finding the cutoff to be arbitrary and causing a crisis for those relying on them. The Justice Department argued SNAP no longer existed due to lack of funding, but the judge mandated the use of contingency funds and exploration of other federal resources to sustain the program. This ruling follows a similar case where another judge found the suspension of SNAP benefits likely unlawful, and the Trump administration is expected to appeal the order.
Read More
A federal judge in Boston expressed skepticism regarding the Trump administration’s plan to suspend SNAP benefits due to the government shutdown, suggesting the process involves finding an equitable way to reduce benefits. The judge indicated a preference for utilizing emergency funds to maintain the program, emphasizing that Congress’s intent was to prioritize funding. This hearing occurred as the U.S. Department of Agriculture planned to freeze payments, impacting approximately one in eight Americans who rely on the program. The court considered the arguments of 25 Democratic-led states, and a ruling was expected to apply nationwide, regardless of the Supreme Court’s limitations on nationwide injunctions.
Read More
A class-action lawsuit has been filed by New Yorkers receiving food stamps against the Trump administration in response to new work requirements taking effect soon. The plaintiffs allege the changes to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) were implemented too quickly and will result in thousands losing monthly food aid. The lawsuit specifically challenges the USDA’s rescinding of state and local waivers, which previously exempted recipients from work requirements. The suit is concerned about the impact on recipients who rely on the benefits, which provide a critical lifeline for many in the city.
Read More
After announcing there will be no food stamps going out the month of November, Trump canceled 94 million pounds of food aid. That’s where we start, isn’t it? It’s hard to even begin to process the sheer audacity, the cold calculation, of such a move. To deliberately deny food assistance, especially with Thanksgiving looming on the horizon, is, frankly, breathtaking in its callousness. It’s the kind of thing that makes you stop and wonder what someone has to be like to even contemplate such a thing, let alone implement it.
After announcing there will be no food stamps going out the month of November, Trump canceled 94 million pounds of food aid, and the implications of this action are vast.… Continue reading
Amidst the ongoing government shutdown, roughly 42 million individuals are at risk of losing access to critical food assistance programs in November. The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), the formal name for food stamps, is projected to run out of funding within two weeks. Without intervention, many vulnerable and hungry families will lose access to this vital support, with states already halting new applications. Although the Trump administration previously diverted funds to maintain other programs, officials have stated there is not enough available to assist the food stamp program, raising concerns about the program’s ability to provide assistance.
Read More
The scoop is out: the Trump administration is warning about dwindling funds for food stamps if the government shutdown continues. It’s a stark message, and it’s sending a shiver down the spines of many, especially those who rely on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP. This news isn’t just a headline; it represents a potential crisis, a real-world consequence of political gridlock.
This situation brings up some serious questions about priorities. There’s a definite feeling that something’s off when funds for programs that feed families are in jeopardy, while other areas of spending, like perhaps military budgets or even certain government events, seem to be unaffected.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood