The Republican “One Big, Beautiful Bill” proposes significant changes to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) to offset the cost of massive tax cuts. Key changes include shifting 5% of SNAP’s $100 billion annual cost to states starting in 2028, increasing work requirements to age 60, and preventing benefit increases beyond inflation. These cuts, totaling $230 billion, are central to the bill’s passage, garnering support from fiscally conservative lawmakers. Democrats strongly oppose these measures, citing the negative impact on vulnerable populations.
Read More
The USDA’s recent decision to slash $1 billion in funding for school and food bank programs that purchase fresh produce from local farms is a deeply concerning development. This cut disproportionately affects rural and low-income communities, many located in traditionally Republican-leaning counties, where schools heavily rely on federal aid to provide nutritious meals to students. The impact on food security for these children could be significant, potentially hindering their academic progress and overall well-being. The long-term consequences of this funding reduction extend far beyond the immediate effect on hungry students; it could significantly damage the vitality of local farming communities who are already struggling.… Continue reading
The USDA plans to close its D.C. headquarters, resulting in thousands of layoffs and the relocation of remaining staff to three yet-to-be-determined national hubs. This restructuring also targets numerous field office leases. The stated rationale is to better serve farmers and ranchers, although critics argue that centralization near other agencies would be more effective. Concerns are rising among farmers, particularly given the current planting season and previous, albeit temporarily reversed, job cuts.
Read More
The Trump administration’s budget cuts led to the cancellation of 20 truckloads of food—approximately 500,000 pounds—destined for the Greater Cleveland Food Bank, impacting deliveries scheduled between April and July 2025. This resulted in a loss of roughly $1 million worth of food, including staples like milk, eggs, and meat. The cancellations stemmed from a broader USDA suspension of $500 million in funding for nationwide food bank programs, part of a review of Commodity Credit Corp. funding. While the USDA claims to continue TEFAP purchases, the food bank, already facing a state budget cut, emphasizes the significant impact on their ability to meet community needs.
Read More
The Greater Cleveland Food Bank faces the cancellation of $2 million worth of food from the Federal Emergency Food Assistance Program, potentially leaving thousands without food this week. This loss, equivalent to a week’s supply for Northeast Ohio, includes vital fresh produce from local farmers participating in the Food for Purchase Assistance program. The cancellations stem from broader federal spending cuts, the reasons for which remain unexplained by the Department of Agriculture. This crisis is exacerbated by proposed state budget cuts, creating a severe threat to hunger relief and local agriculture.
Read More
Feeding America West Michigan faces a critical shortage of 600,000 pounds of food due to the USDA’s cancellation of 32 scheduled truckloads from its Emergency Food Assistance Program. This $1.1 million loss, attributed to a federal review and program pause, exacerbates existing challenges, including potential reductions in food assistance eligibility and the food bank’s current 50% subsidization of federal programs. The food bank is actively seeking alternative sources, including farmers and donors, to ensure continued food distribution, though the food offered may differ from what was originally planned. The situation underscores the significant impact of federal budget cuts on food security.
Read More
The USDA is eliminating two programs totaling $1 billion in funding for schools and food banks to purchase food from local sources. This decision, attributed to a shift toward “fiscally responsible initiatives,” cancels $660 million for the Local Food for Schools program and $420 million for the Local Food Purchase Assistance Cooperative Agreement. The funding cuts significantly impact schools already facing high food costs, forcing reductions in fresh produce and local sourcing. The termination affects numerous schools and farmers nationwide, jeopardizing both school nutrition and local economies.
Read More
The USDA’s termination of funding for the Local Food Purchase Assistance Cooperative Agreement will eliminate $11 million in funding for North Carolina food banks. This includes a $2 million loss for the Food Bank of Central and Eastern North Carolina, jeopardizing the purchase of fresh produce directly from local farmers. The resulting economic impact on farmers and the increasing food insecurity in the 34 served counties are significant concerns. The food bank is now seeking state funding to offset this substantial loss.
Read More
The U.S. Department of Agriculture is eliminating two pandemic-era programs that provided over $1 billion to schools and food banks for local food purchases. This funding, totaling $660 million for schools and an unspecified amount for food banks, enabled initiatives like direct purchases from local farmers and fishermen, improving school meal quality and supporting local economies. The termination, attributed to the programs’ pandemic origins and shifting USDA priorities, is causing concern amongst school districts and food banks already facing budgetary constraints and rising food costs. Critics fear this signals further cuts to school nutrition programs, potentially impacting children’s access to reliable food sources.
Read More
The Department of Agriculture has eliminated over $1 billion in funding for programs supporting schools and food banks’ purchases from local farmers. This includes a termination of $660 million for the Local Food for Schools program and $420 million for the Local Food Purchase Assistance Cooperative Agreement Program. Multiple states have been notified of these cuts, attributed to a government efficiency initiative aimed at reducing federal spending. The decision is drawing sharp criticism for its negative impact on children, farmers, and underserved communities.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood