President Trump announced significant tariffs—25 percent on Mexican and Canadian goods, and 10 percent on Chinese imports—to combat drug and migrant flows into the U.S., a move impacting over $1.5 trillion in North American trade and hundreds of billions more with China. These tariffs threaten to increase prices on various consumer goods, including groceries and beverages, potentially impacting voters significantly. Economists warn of substantial economic repercussions from this action. The tariffs also directly contradict previous trade agreements touted by the president.
Read More
President-elect Trump plans to impose significant tariffs on goods from Mexico, Canada, and China upon taking office, claiming this will combat drug trafficking and illegal immigration. Numerous economic studies predict these tariffs will dramatically increase prices for consumers, potentially costing American households thousands of dollars and shrinking the national economy. Despite these analyses, Trump appears determined to proceed, using tariffs as a bargaining chip or potentially intending to inflict economic harm. Experts disagree on whether this is a genuine policy or a negotiating tactic, but the potential for immediate economic consequences remains high.
Read More
A Harris Poll reveals that two-thirds of Americans believe Donald Trump’s proposed tariffs will increase consumer prices, a concern shared across party lines. The majority anticipate companies passing tariff costs onto consumers, leading to higher prices for goods and impacting household budgets. Many are already preemptively adjusting their spending habits in anticipation of these price increases. This widespread apprehension casts doubt on the popularity of Trump’s tariff policy platform, despite his claims that tariffs are economically beneficial.
Read More
Trump’s promise of a 25% tariff on all products from Mexico and Canada is a bold move with potentially devastating consequences. The sheer scale of the proposed tariff – impacting all goods from our closest trading partners – is unprecedented and would drastically alter the economic landscape.
This action, if implemented, would not simply increase the price of imported goods by 25%. The increased cost would ripple throughout the economy, impacting businesses, consumers, and the overall stability of the nation’s financial system. The added expenses would likely be passed on to American consumers, leading to a significant surge in inflation, effectively making everyday goods and services substantially more expensive.… Continue reading
Walmart and Lowe’s, along with other major retailers, are considering price increases in response to President-elect Trump’s proposed tariff plan. This plan includes significant tariffs on imports, particularly from China, potentially impacting a large portion of their product lines. Both companies are actively assessing the implications for their supply chains and costs. Economists predict that consumers will ultimately bear the brunt of these increased costs through higher prices on goods.
Read More
Egg prices are soaring, leaving many wondering why their grocery bills are suddenly so much higher. A significant factor contributing to this increase is the impact of avian flu outbreaks. These outbreaks have decimated poultry populations, resulting in a noticeable decline in egg production. This simple supply and demand dynamic is the primary driver behind the price hike; fewer eggs available means higher prices for consumers.
The reduced egg supply isn’t simply a matter of a few farms being affected; the scale of the avian flu outbreaks has been substantial. Many large-scale producers have experienced significant losses, directly impacting the national egg supply chain.… Continue reading
Despite campaign promises, President-elect Trump’s proposed across-the-board tariff hikes are expected to increase consumer prices, contradicting his claims that tariffs only impact foreign countries. Walmart, a major retailer, has warned that these tariffs will be inflationary, impacting consumers directly through higher prices. Experts disagree with Trump’s assertion that tariffs are solely a tax on foreign nations, instead highlighting that these costs are ultimately absorbed by American importers and consumers. The potential for retaliatory trade wars and negative impacts on American jobs further complicate the economic outlook.
Read More
Facing criticism for policies contributing to housing shortages, inflation, and strained public services, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau acknowledged mistakes in his government’s immigration approach. The government’s rapid increase in immigration, intended to address labor shortages, inadvertently allowed exploitation by “bad actors” such as fake colleges and corporations. To rectify this, Canada will significantly reduce both permanent and temporary immigration over the next three years, prioritizing skilled workers in crucial sectors. This temporary reduction aims to alleviate pressure on housing and infrastructure while the country works towards expanding its capacity.
Read More
Economists predict that two of Donald Trump’s key campaign promises—mass deportations and increased tariffs—would significantly increase food prices in the United States. Deporting undocumented immigrants, who comprise a substantial portion of the agricultural workforce, would cause labor shortages leading to higher wages and subsequently higher prices for domestically grown produce. Simultaneously, tariffs on imported food would further elevate costs for consumers, as there’s no mechanism to offset the combined impact of labor shortages and import taxes. This price increase would affect a wide range of food products, from fruits and vegetables to dairy and meat, impacting all segments of the food supply chain.
Read More
Following the announcement of a key political appointment, Novavax and BioNTech experienced significant stock drops exceeding 7%, while Moderna reached its 2024 low. Pfizer saw more moderate losses. This market reaction follows the pharmaceutical industry’s substantial campaign donations to both parties, albeit with a greater contribution to Republicans. However, growing investor concern over the potential long-term economic costs of certain policies is contributing to broader market declines.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood