The U.S. national debt has reached a record $38 trillion, the fastest accumulation of a trillion dollars outside of the COVID-19 pandemic. Experts warn this accelerating debt leads to higher inflation, impacting Americans’ purchasing power and increasing borrowing costs. This surge in debt, compounded by rising interest costs, is a concerning sign that lawmakers are not addressing their fiscal responsibilities. The Joint Economic Committee estimates that the total national debt has grown by $69,713.82 per second for the past year.
Read More
Florida is set to close the “Alligator Alcatraz” detention facility after a federal judge’s ruling, despite a $245 million investment. The facility, constructed at the Dade-Collier Training and Transition Airport, was intended to support the Trump administration’s focus on immigration enforcement. However, legal challenges, particularly from environmental groups and the Miccosukee Tribe, led to its closure within 60 days. The facility’s closure would be a setback for Governor DeSantis and the Trump administration, potentially increasing pressure on existing detention facilities.
Read More
GOP megabill’s final score: $3.4T in red ink and 10 million kicked off health insurance, CBO says, it’s a tough pill to swallow, isn’t it? The numbers tell a stark story: a massive increase in the national debt, and millions losing their healthcare coverage. It’s a punch to the gut for anyone who believes in fiscal responsibility and the well-being of all citizens.
The fiscal consequences are staggering. A $3.4 trillion increase in the deficit. Think about that for a moment. All the talk of cutting spending, of tightening the belt, and it ends with a mountain of debt that future generations will have to grapple with.… Continue reading
Trump’s recent call to scrap the debt limit is a bold move that sparks a whirlwind of reactions and interpretations. The proposal immediately throws into question the very nature of fiscal responsibility, especially considering the context of his past pronouncements and actions.
The idea itself – eliminating the debt limit – has merit for some. It’s argued that having Congress approve the budget and then separately authorize exceeding that budget is redundant and inefficient. It essentially means Congress votes to spend money and then votes again on whether to pay for the spending they’ve already approved. This process creates an artificial bottleneck where the government could potentially default on its financial obligations, triggering a global economic crisis, based purely on a procedural technicality.… Continue reading
Wisconsin Senator Ron Johnson, along with other Republican senators like Rand Paul and Josh Hawley, strongly opposes the proposed “One Big, Beautiful” spending bill due to its substantial increase to the national debt and expansion of tax cuts for high-income earners. Johnson argues the bill’s increased spending is fiscally irresponsible and morally wrong, contradicting the stated goal of deficit reduction. Despite this opposition, House Speaker Mike Johnson remains confident in the bill’s passage with bipartisan support. However, Senator Johnson believes sufficient Republican opposition exists in the Senate to halt the bill unless significant spending cuts are implemented.
Read More
The House GOP’s recent unveiling of a plan to raise the debt limit by a staggering $4 trillion has sparked widespread debate and criticism. This massive increase, coming so soon after previous adjustments, raises serious questions about fiscal responsibility and the party’s stated priorities.
The sheer scale of the proposed increase is undeniably jarring. Four trillion dollars is a monumental sum, representing a significant expansion of the national debt. This raises concerns about the long-term implications for the country’s economic stability and the potential burden on future generations. It’s hard to ignore the apparent contradiction between this significant debt increase and the party’s past rhetoric about fiscal conservatism.… Continue reading
Republicans’ partial tax plan, estimated to cost $5 trillion, is generating significant concern about the nation’s fiscal future. This massive figure represents a substantial increase in the national debt, adding to already considerable annual deficits. The projected increase in debt is alarming, especially considering that a significant portion of the current national debt was accumulated during a previous administration.
This proposed tax plan raises serious questions about fiscal responsibility. The sheer scale of the projected cost – $5 trillion – is staggering, and its potential long-term implications for the economy and the country’s creditworthiness are deeply troubling. Such a dramatic increase in debt will inevitably place a heavy burden on future generations.… Continue reading
Despite efforts to reduce government spending, the federal deficit rose by $196 billion this fiscal year due to increased spending on defense, Homeland Security, and social safety net programs like Social Security and Medicare. The increase in spending, driven largely by rising costs of entitlement programs and defense, far outpaced the increase in tax revenue. Republicans, facing pressure to make significant spending cuts, are struggling to reconcile this with their proposed tax cuts and are considering various strategies to manage the deficit, including potential tax increases on high-income earners and accounting maneuvers. These actions could still lead to increased borrowing costs for the federal government.
Read More
Republicans are reportedly planning to offset the cost of Trump-era tax cuts by selling off public lands. This strategy, at its core, involves liquidating valuable national assets to compensate for decreased government revenue resulting from the tax cuts. The inherent problem is that this is a one-time solution to a recurring problem—a yearly budget shortfall is being addressed by a finite resource. This suggests a fundamental misunderstanding of basic fiscal responsibility. It’s like using your savings to pay your credit card bill each month; eventually, you’ll run out of savings.
This approach of selling public lands raises concerns about the long-term consequences.… Continue reading
This article is protected by copyright © 2025 Fortune Media IP Limited. Use of this site is governed by our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, including a notice regarding the sale or sharing of personal information. FORTUNE is a registered trademark, and the site may contain affiliate links. Finally, all offers are subject to change.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood