Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey publicly rejected a Homeland Security proposal to establish a designated protest zone, emphasizing that First Amendment rights are not confined to specific areas. This disagreement arose amid escalating tensions over federal immigration enforcement operations, with the Justice Department investigating Frey and Minnesota Governor Tim Walz for potentially impeding federal agents. The deployment of nearly 3,000 ICE and Border Patrol agents and President Trump’s threat to invoke the Insurrection Act further complicated the situation. Despite the ongoing protests and clashes, local authorities continue to call for peaceful demonstrations and are urging ICE to withdraw from the city.
Read More
A Minnesota judge ruled that federal immigration officers in the Minneapolis area cannot detain or use tear gas on peaceful protesters who are not obstructing authorities. This decision stems from a case filed by six activists who have been observing Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Border Patrol activities related to an immigration crackdown. The judge’s ruling prohibits detaining drivers and passengers without reasonable suspicion of obstruction and mandates probable cause or reasonable suspicion for arrests. The U.S. Department of Homeland Security issued a statement after the ruling stating they would be taking appropriate and constitutional measures to uphold the rule of law.
Read More
The judge expressed astonishment at the actions of high-ranking government officials, including Cabinet secretaries, who were found to have conspired to violate First Amendment rights. He specifically named Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, criticizing their failure to uphold the Constitution. The judge drew a stark comparison between the administration’s deportation policies and the historical practice of returning enslaved people under the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850. He concluded that the officials, including the President, held a concerning perspective on freedom, based on the evidence presented in the case.
Read More
During a hearing in a Minnesota federal court, a Department of Justice attorney argued that observing police does not receive First Amendment protection. This assertion was made in response to a lawsuit by Minnesota protesters who claimed immigration agents arrested, pepper-sprayed, and intimidated them. The attorney cited a 2023 ruling to support his argument. Judge Katherine Menendez, overseeing the case, questioned the legality of federal law enforcement stopping protesters following them in vehicles.
Read More
Following the fatal shooting of Renee Good by an ICE agent, several Republican officials prioritized defending the shooter and criticizing dissent. Representative Roger Williams of Texas urged citizens to cease demonstrations and become “civil,” suggesting that such actions provoked the incident. Similarly, Representative Wesley Hunt of Texas emphasized the importance of following federal officer instructions, while Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem questioned the rationale behind disputing a president perceived as focused on safety. These statements reflect a broader trend within the party to suppress dissent and defend law enforcement.
Read More
Senator Mark Kelly has filed a lawsuit against Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and the Pentagon, claiming their efforts to censure and demote him are unconstitutional. The lawsuit alleges Hegseth’s actions violate Kelly’s First Amendment rights and the Speech and Debate Clause, arguing the Executive Branch cannot punish a Senator for political speech. The suit claims Hegseth’s actions are in response to Kelly and other retired service members’ video urging military members to refuse illegal orders. Kelly states the actions against him send a chilling message to retired veterans and erodes the separation of powers.
Read More
In the wake of the shooting death of Renée Good by an ICE agent, Rep. Roger Williams called for an end to protests and civil behavior, reflecting a broader MAGA-world view on dissent. The administration has been attacking the First Amendment by targeting critics, including those involved in pro-Palestinian activism, and threatening them with arrest and deportation. This is exemplified by the rhetoric of Williams and Sen. Tommy Tuberville, who both suggest that protesting should be curtailed. Rep. Wesley Hunt’s statement that people should obey federal officers’ instructions highlights the administration’s willingness to exert control.
Read More
The Trump administration has taken the position that recording Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers in public constitutes a form of violence and should be curtailed. Officials have publicly stated they will prosecute those who record ICE agents, conflating free speech with threats. This has resulted in actions such as strong-arming companies to remove apps tracking ICE activity and targeting protesters and journalists, particularly in Chicago under “Operation Midway Blitz.” A federal judge issued an injunction against the DHS, citing the government’s conduct as shocking. Legal experts and court precedents confirm the First Amendment protects the right to record police in public, yet the administration’s actions demonstrate a pattern of informal repression and an attempt to stifle public accountability.
Read More
An Austin Peay State University theatre professor, Darren Michael, who was fired for social media comments about Charlie Kirk, has reached a settlement with the university. As part of the agreement, Michael will receive $500,000 and reimbursement for therapy after he was reinstated to his position. The university admitted it did not follow its termination policy. Michael’s attorney is also exploring options against those who interfered with his First Amendment rights, highlighting his case as part of a larger trend of individuals facing repercussions for online comments about Kirk.
Read More
The Trump administration is experiencing a string of setbacks in federal cases targeting those who oppose aggressive immigration enforcement. Recent court decisions in Los Angeles saw a jury acquit Bobby Nuñez and a judge dismiss the case against Carlitos Ricardo Parias, both facing charges related to confrontations with ICE agents. These failures follow similar outcomes in Chicago and Washington D.C., where protesters have also seen charges dismissed or been acquitted, often due to questionable evidence or perceived violations of civil rights. These outcomes are unusual, as federal cases typically favor the prosecution, raising questions about the administration’s legal strategy and potentially impacting the credibility of law enforcement.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker
Judge Rules Minneapolis ICE Can’t Detain Peaceful Protesters
A Minnesota judge ruled that federal immigration officers in the Minneapolis area cannot detain or use tear gas on peaceful protesters who are not obstructing authorities. This decision stems from a case filed by six activists who have been observing Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Border Patrol activities related to an immigration crackdown. The judge’s ruling prohibits detaining drivers and passengers without reasonable suspicion of obstruction and mandates probable cause or reasonable suspicion for arrests. The U.S. Department of Homeland Security issued a statement after the ruling stating they would be taking appropriate and constitutional measures to uphold the rule of law.
Read More