Filibuster

McConnell: Democrats would end the filibuster if they sweep on Election Day

McConnell’s recent statements regarding the potential elimination of the filibuster if Democrats sweep on Election Day has sparked quite the reaction. While some may view this as a threat, for many, including myself, it is seen as a promising development. The filibuster, in its modern form, has strayed far from its original purpose and has been used as a tool to hinder progress and maintain the status quo rather than foster meaningful debate and consensus.

The filibuster, which was once a theatrical display of endurance and passion, has devolved into a mere procedural hurdle that allows for obstruction without accountability. The shift to a “silent filibuster” in 1975 only compounded the issue, leading to a system where legislation can be endlessly delayed without any real effort or commitment from those invoking it.… Continue reading

Kamala Harris tells WPR she supports eliminating the filibuster to restore abortion rights

The filibuster has long been a contentious issue in American politics, with its roots stemming from a bygone era where drawn-out debates were meant to serve as a check on hasty decision-making. However, in modern times, the filibuster has become a tool used to obstruct progress and stymie important legislation from being passed. The idea of eliminating the filibuster altogether, as proposed by Kamala Harris, is a bold move that could potentially reshape the political landscape and pave the way for significant reforms.

One of the main arguments against the filibuster is that it is undemocratic and often used for undemocratic purposes, such as blocking civil rights legislation.… Continue reading