Senator Cory Booker’s lengthy Senate floor speech, while not a filibuster, served as a dramatic protest against President Trump’s agenda, highlighting the Democrats’ limited legislative power and their efforts to obstruct Republican initiatives. The speech, among the longest in Senate history, aimed to demonstrate Democratic opposition and potentially solidify Booker’s leadership role within the party. Although attendance is not mandatory, fellow Democrats showed support by engaging with Booker. His sustained effort underscores the Democrats’ strategic use of procedural tactics to counter the Trump administration.
Read More
Senator Cory Booker delivered a nearly 20-hour speech on the Senate floor, criticizing the Trump administration’s policies and actions. His marathon speech, prompted by constituent pressure for stronger responses to administration actions, highlighted concerns about violations of core American principles and the detrimental effects on various institutions. The speech, while not immediately impacting legislative action, drew comparisons to other lengthy Senate speeches aimed at raising awareness and influencing public debate. Booker’s actions garnered both praise from civil rights leaders and mockery from the White House.
Read More
Senator Cory Booker engaged in a prolonged Senate floor speech, although not a technically defined filibuster, to protest what he views as unacceptable government actions. His speech, exceeding 15 hours, targeted conservative Republicans for various policy positions, including their handling of fiscal issues and support of figures perceived as undermining democratic institutions. Booker’s actions, largely ignored by mainstream media, draw a parallel to historical acts of civil disobedience, aiming for a memorable and impactful protest against the current political climate. He continues to speak out on issues such as threats to Social Security.
Read More
Senator Cory Booker launched a 17-hour-plus speech on the Senate floor to protest the Trump administration’s policies, specifically targeting cuts to social programs and questionable executive orders. His marathon address, though not a filibuster, aims to highlight the Democrats’ opposition to these actions. Booker’s protest, drawing inspiration from the Civil Rights movement, underscores the party’s struggle to effectively counter the administration’s agenda. He continues his speech despite physical limitations and advice from colleagues, aiming to raise public awareness of what he sees as a national crisis.
Read More
Senator Cory Booker delivered a 17+ hour speech on the Senate floor, protesting the Trump administration’s policies and actions. His address covered numerous topics, from healthcare and the economy to the rule of law, incorporating constituent letters and comments from world leaders. Though not technically a filibuster, Booker’s speech, inspired by John Lewis’s call for “good trouble,” aimed to highlight what he views as a disregard for the Constitution and American needs. The speech, exceeding even Senator Chris Murphy’s 15-hour gun control protest, continued despite the Senate’s scheduled business, utilizing permissible strategies like yielding to colleagues’ questions to maintain his standing.
Read More
Following a Senate vote to pass a continuing resolution averting a government shutdown, Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez criticized fellow Democrats for ending the filibuster to pass the GOP-led bill, sparking a public exchange with former Senator Kyrsten Sinema. Ocasio-Cortez reiterated her stance against the filibuster, arguing it disproportionately blocks Democratic legislation. Sinema, in response, highlighted Ocasio-Cortez’s past criticisms of her position. The dispute highlights ongoing divisions within the Democratic party regarding the filibuster’s role in legislative processes.
Read More
Fueled by outrage over Senator Schumer’s decision to vote against a filibuster on a GOP spending bill, protesters rallied outside his Brooklyn home. The bill includes billions in cuts to federal agencies and increased defense spending, furthering the Trump-Musk administration’s already significant slashing of federal jobs and services. Schumer’s reversal, allowing the bill to pass, is seen as a betrayal by many constituents who believe he prioritized avoiding a government shutdown over opposing the Republican agenda. Demonstrators employed a “people’s microphone” to voice their anger and demand stronger Democratic opposition. The protest, co-sponsored by Indivisible and Food and Water Watch, reflects widespread frustration with the Democrats’ perceived lack of resistance to the current administration.
Read More
Democratic senators in Alabama employed a filibuster to prevent a vote on a bill altering the appointment process for the Alabama Department of Archives and History’s Board of Trustees. The bill, sponsored by Sen. Chris Elliott, would shift appointment power from the board itself to the governor, House speaker, and Senate president pro tempore. Democrats voiced concerns that this change could lead to political influence over the agency’s work, potentially impacting historical preservation efforts. While Sen. Elliott argued the bill was a compromise and intended to improve the board’s accountability, the Democrats’ filibuster successfully stalled the legislation for the day.
Read More
McConnell’s recent statements regarding the potential elimination of the filibuster if Democrats sweep on Election Day has sparked quite the reaction. While some may view this as a threat, for many, including myself, it is seen as a promising development. The filibuster, in its modern form, has strayed far from its original purpose and has been used as a tool to hinder progress and maintain the status quo rather than foster meaningful debate and consensus.
The filibuster, which was once a theatrical display of endurance and passion, has devolved into a mere procedural hurdle that allows for obstruction without accountability. The shift to a “silent filibuster” in 1975 only compounded the issue, leading to a system where legislation can be endlessly delayed without any real effort or commitment from those invoking it.… Continue reading
The filibuster has long been a contentious issue in American politics, with its roots stemming from a bygone era where drawn-out debates were meant to serve as a check on hasty decision-making. However, in modern times, the filibuster has become a tool used to obstruct progress and stymie important legislation from being passed. The idea of eliminating the filibuster altogether, as proposed by Kamala Harris, is a bold move that could potentially reshape the political landscape and pave the way for significant reforms.
One of the main arguments against the filibuster is that it is undemocratic and often used for undemocratic purposes, such as blocking civil rights legislation.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker