Following a subpoena from the committee in July, Ghislaine Maxwell has indicated through her lawyers that she will invoke her Fifth Amendment rights and refuse to answer questions. Committee Chairman Comer stated that this decision makes a costly in-person appearance by the committee an unwise use of taxpayer resources. Maxwell had previously expressed a willingness to cooperate under specific conditions, including immunity, which were rejected. Before the committee’s subpoena, Maxwell spoke to the Justice Department, stating she had never seen Donald Trump at Epstein’s house.
Read More
Utah governor says alleged Kirk shooter not cooperating with authorities, a statement that immediately throws up red flags for many. It’s a phrase that, in the context of a high-profile case, can be interpreted in a variety of ways. The most obvious, of course, is that the accused individual is exercising his constitutional right to remain silent, as any lawyer worth their salt would advise. This right is enshrined in the Fifth Amendment and protects individuals from self-incrimination. It’s a cornerstone of the legal system.
Now, the lack of cooperation could be as simple as the suspect refusing to answer questions.… Continue reading
A recently resurfaced video clip from a 2010 deposition shows Jeffrey Epstein pleading the Fifth when asked if he ever socialized with Donald Trump in the presence of underage girls. The deposition, unearthed by MeidasTouch, reveals Epstein’s response to questions from an attorney concerning his relationship with Trump. Although Epstein admitted to socializing with Trump, he invoked his Fifth Amendment rights when questioned about the presence of underage girls. Trump has denied any wrongdoing and his team has claimed the clip is out of context.
Read More
A recently resurfaced deposition clip from 2010 shows Jeffrey Epstein pleading the Fifth when asked if he socialized with Donald Trump in the presence of underage girls. Epstein did acknowledge socializing with Trump. This clip has spurred further investigation and scrutiny into Trump’s associations with Epstein. Trump and his administration have denied any wrongdoing and dismissed the video as “out-of-context frame grabs.” The former president is currently suing the Wall Street Journal for reporting on the card he sent to Epstein.
Read More
Newly revealed information suggests a connection between Donald Trump and the infamous documents, potentially explaining the Trump administration’s sudden halt to their release and the president’s heightened defensiveness. This revelation coincides with Speaker Mike Johnson’s preemptive end to a legislative session to avoid a vote on further file releases. The internal turmoil, including Dan Bongino’s absence and Trump’s condemnation of those concerned, stems from the president’s desire to keep his name concealed within the files. Despite anticipated dismissals of this report, Trump’s reactions and distractions have only amplified media scrutiny and public attention to the matter.
Read More
A US judge recently blocked a Trump-era policy concerning passport applications for transgender individuals, declaring it discriminatory and unconstitutional. The judge ruled that the State Department’s policy, implemented via an executive order, likely violated the Fifth Amendment by discriminating based on sex and stemming from irrational prejudice against transgender Americans. This highlights the ongoing tension between executive actions and judicial review, demonstrating how the courts serve as a crucial check on potential overreach of power.
The ruling itself is a testament to the enduring power of constitutional rights, underscoring that even executive orders cannot override fundamental protections afforded by the Constitution.… Continue reading
Senator Shanahan expressed shock and betrayal over the HHS appointments of Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s siblings, contrary to prior assurances. This follows Kennedy’s recent decision-making seemingly influenced by an unknown third party, not President Trump. The situation is further complicated by Kennedy’s history of promoting controversial and unfounded claims, aligning with the anti-vaccine stances of his appointed siblings. Shanahan’s statement highlights a significant internal conflict within the Kennedy campaign.
Read More
During a recent interview, President Trump responded “I don’t know” when asked if he has an obligation to uphold the Constitution, specifically regarding due process for immigrants. This followed his administration’s deportation of individuals, including those with prior legal protection, actions that have been challenged in court. Trump claimed a mandate to deport immigrants despite judicial rulings against his methods, citing the Supreme Court’s interpretation of the issue as differing from his own. He also disregarded the Fifth Amendment’s guarantee of due process for all persons within the U.S., citing the logistical challenges of individual trials.
Read More
President Trump’s prioritization of mass deportations has led to clashes with the judiciary over due process rights for immigrants. He expressed uncertainty about the Fifth Amendment’s applicability, suggesting the required legal processes would be excessively time-consuming. The administration’s actions, including the controversial use of the Alien Enemies Act and the deportation of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, have faced Supreme Court rebuke, highlighting a pattern of circumventing established legal procedures. Despite claiming adherence to legal counsel, Trump’s approach has consistently challenged judicial rulings and constitutional protections for immigrants.
Read More
Despite Democratic efforts to prevent deportations without due process, amendments to a budget bill aimed at barring ICE from such actions, including the deportation of U.S. citizens, failed to pass the House Judiciary Committee. These amendments followed President Trump’s suggestion of sending U.S. citizens to a Salvadoran prison and actual deportations of Venezuelan citizens to that facility without legal proceedings. Democrats criticized Republicans for implicitly supporting the circumvention of Fifth Amendment rights. The rejection of these amendments leaves ICE with the ability to proceed with deportations under the current legal framework.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood