A recent executive order defining sex based solely on gamete size at conception has sparked debate, with some claiming it inadvertently declared all individuals female. However, this interpretation is inaccurate, though the order’s ambiguity does highlight the complexities of sex determination. Scientific consensus rejects a strictly binary understanding of sex, emphasizing the multitude of factors involved. The order’s true intention appears to be advancing the concept of “fetal personhood,” potentially impacting abortion rights.
Read More
Executive Order language declaring fetal personhood from conception contradicts established biological understanding of fetal development, as genitalia differentiation begins only around six to seven weeks gestation. This legal categorization of a fetus as a person has significant implications, including restricting abortion access and potentially criminalizing pregnant individuals. Furthermore, the concept of fetal personhood has been used to limit access to IVF and birth control. The Texas GOP’s recent attempt to codify this ideology highlights its broad potential impact beyond abortion rights.
Read More
The issue of 200+ women facing criminal charges over pregnancy in the year after Dobbs is alarming and deeply disturbing. The fact that women who have experienced miscarriages are being accused of child abuse and locked up is beyond comprehension. Miscarriages are unfortunately common, and the idea that someone could weaponize such a devastating experience to incarcerate women is cruel and heartless.
One particular case in Oklahoma where a woman was charged with felony child neglect after her baby tested positive for marijuana at birth stands out. Despite having a doctor-approved state license to use medical marijuana during her pregnancy, prosecutors pursued the case using fetal personhood language.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker