Federalization

Trump to Federalize Illinois National Guard: Concerns and Reactions Emerge

Trump to federalize Illinois National Guard, Pritzker says – this is the core of the matter, a situation that’s understandably generating a lot of reaction. The immediate thought is, “The jack boots are upon us.” It’s a phrase that captures the underlying anxiety, the feeling that something fundamental is shifting, that perhaps we’re witnessing the erosion of established norms.

The playbook, it seems, was already written, with echoes of past administrations and figures like Stephen Miller, already involved in previous attempts. The key aspect to remember is that federalizing the National Guard doesn’t automatically equate to law enforcement deployment. It’s a distinction that seems vital, but also potentially misleading.… Continue reading

Trump Takes Control of Oregon National Guard, State Files Lawsuit

President Donald Trump authorized the Secretary of Defense to federalize 200 members of the Oregon National Guard for 60 days to protect federal property, citing potential protests. Oregon Governor Tina Kotek and Attorney General Dan Rayfield condemned the move as an abuse of power, arguing that the President lacks the authority to federalize the guard under Title 10 of the United States Code, as no invasion or rebellion exists. The state swiftly filed a lawsuit seeking a temporary restraining order to block the deployment, as the situation in Portland is being managed by local police, and the state officials believe the federalization is unnecessary and unlawful. This action mirrors a similar situation in California, and Oregon officials express concerns over the lack of details about the deployment plans and the President’s view of the state’s condition.

Read More

Trump’s D.C. Military Surge Costs at Least $1 Million Daily

The deployment of military forces in Washington D.C., with tasks including “community safety patrols,” and “area beautification,” could cost over $1 million per day. This follows President Trump’s efforts to federalize D.C., which involves the seizure of the city’s police force and flooding streets with federal officers. Governors from several states are sending National Guard troops to assist. Experts predict that the open-ended occupation could cost hundreds of millions of dollars, a sum that exceeds the amount needed for affordable housing for D.C.’s unhoused population.

Read More

Democrats Introduce Measure to End Trump’s Control of D.C. Police

Democrats introduce measure to terminate Trump’s D.C. takeover, a move that feels like a long-awaited response. It’s a show of force, signaling the party’s strong opposition to what’s seen as an unprecedented power grab. While the chances of this measure succeeding might be slim, the message it sends is clear: Democrats are not going to stand idly by.

This resolution, spearheaded by key figures like Rep. Jamie Raskin and Sen. Chris Van Hollen, directly challenges the “crime emergency” Trump declared, allowing him to temporarily federalize the D.C. Metropolitan Police Department. The core argument is that this action goes against the Home Rule Act, and that Trump doesn’t have the authority to federalize the MPD in this manner.… Continue reading

Trump Federalizes DC Police, Deploys National Guard Amidst Falling Crime Rates

President Trump announced the federalization of the Washington, D.C., police department and the deployment of National Guard troops, citing a need to address unchecked crime in the city. He stated this action would liberate the capital and invoked Section 740 of the Home Rule Act, allowing him to temporarily assume control of the Metropolitan Police force due to “special conditions of an emergency nature.” However, this emergency control is limited to 30 days unless extended by congressional action. Despite Trump’s claims, violent crime in D.C. has actually decreased to a 30-year low.

Read More

Joe Biden Faces Growing Calls to Federalize Texas National Guard

Joe Biden Faces Growing Calls to Federalize Texas National Guard

The debate surrounding the federalization of the Texas National Guard has reached a critical juncture, as calls for President Joe Biden to take action grow louder. Critics argue that Texas Governor Greg Abbott’s refusal to comply with Supreme Court orders to remove razor wire and his handling of the immigration situation demonstrate a blatant disregard for the rule of law.

At the heart of this issue is a larger question of how far states can go in challenging federal authority. While states have some autonomy, there are clear limits to their power when it comes to matters affecting national security and the welfare of the country as a whole.… Continue reading