A case before the Supreme Court challenges the U.S. Postal Service’s exemption from lawsuits regarding lost or mishandled mail, stemming from a Texas landlord’s claim of deliberate mail withholding. The Postal Service argues a ruling against them could trigger a flood of litigation, particularly impacting the already busy holiday season. The central question is whether the postal exemption to the Federal Tort Claims Act applies when postal employees intentionally fail to deliver mail, with the lower court previously disagreeing with the exemption. A decision in the case is expected to be issued next year.
Read More
Donald Trump stated that he would personally make the decision on whether the government should pay him damages related to past federal investigations, including the Mar-a-Lago search and the Russia investigation. Trump has filed administrative claims seeking approximately $230 million under the Federal Tort Claims Act, which typically involves career officials, although Trump allies now hold key positions within the Justice Department. Trump has stated that he is “suing himself” and may donate any awarded proceeds, despite the unusual nature of a sitting president seeking compensation for investigations into his own conduct. Legal experts suggest these claims are unlikely to succeed due to the nature of the investigations and a statute that is not intended for such circumstances.
Read More
The Supreme Court unanimously ruled to allow the Martin family’s lawsuit against the FBI to proceed, reversing lower court decisions that had dismissed the case. The Court rejected the appeals court’s interpretation of the Federal Tort Claims Act and the Supremacy Clause, clarifying that the Act’s exception for law enforcement actions should not be narrowly construed to shield the government from liability. While the Court did limit the scope of the “law enforcement proviso,” it ultimately paved the way for the family to pursue their claim for damages resulting from the FBI’s wrongful raid. This decision stems from a 2017 incident where the FBI mistakenly raided the Martin family home, causing significant distress and damages.
Read More
The Supreme Court is deciding whether victims of “wrong-house raids” can sue the federal government. This case stems from a 2017 incident where FBI agents mistakenly raided the wrong home, causing significant trauma to the occupants. The question hinges on the interpretation of the Federal Tort Claims Act, specifically whether it allows lawsuits for such errors regardless of whether officers followed orders. The government argues that holding them liable for every mistake would hinder law enforcement, while the plaintiffs contend Congress intended to provide recourse in precisely these circumstances. A ruling is expected this summer.
Read More
In October 2017, FBI agents mistakenly raided Trina Martin’s home, causing significant trauma to her, her boyfriend, and her son. Martin subsequently filed a lawsuit against the government, but a federal judge and appeals court dismissed it, arguing courts shouldn’t second-guess police “honest mistakes.” The Supreme Court will now decide whether the Federal Tort Claims Act allows such lawsuits against the government for wrong-house raids, a question with conflicting precedent across different circuit courts. The case highlights the need for clarity on holding law enforcement accountable for such errors.
Read More
Clifford Law Offices, on behalf of Casey Crafton’s widow, has filed $250 million in pre-case claims against the FAA and U.S. Army, marking an initial legal response to the Washington, D.C. air crash. These claims are a prerequisite to pursuing lawsuits against the federal government for the death of Crafton, who was among the 67 fatalities. The firm also issued preservation letters to American Airlines and the Black Hawk helicopter manufacturers. Failure to respond to the pre-case claims within six months will allow the family to file federal lawsuits within two years.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker