President Biden’s administration achieved a milestone by confirming 235 federal judges, surpassing the number confirmed during President Trump’s first term. This total includes one Supreme Court justice, 45 appeals court judges, and numerous district court judges, reflecting Biden’s prioritization of diverse candidates, such as public defenders and civil rights lawyers. While a historic achievement for the Biden administration, Republicans have indicated their intention to appoint a greater number of judges during Trump’s second term. Despite this, the Biden administration highlights the lasting impact of these lifetime appointments and the diversity of their judicial selections.
Read More
Three federal judges, all Democratic appointees with lifetime appointments, have rescinded their retirement plans, preventing President-elect Trump from filling their seats. This action directly counters Trump’s plans to appoint younger, more conservative judges. The judges’ decisions, while unprecedented in recent history, are viewed by some as a partisan maneuver to avoid Trump’s influence on the judiciary. Republican senators have strongly criticized these actions, while Democrats point to past Republican actions as equally partisan. The situation highlights the increasingly politicized nature of judicial appointments.
Read More
President Biden is on track to appoint more federal judges of color than any president before him, with over 60% of his 233 judicial appointees being people of color. This includes a record-breaking 40 Black women appointed to lifetime federal judgeships, exceeding previous presidential appointments. If confirmed, Benjamin Cheeks’ nomination would bring Biden’s total of Black federal judges to 63, surpassing the number appointed by any other president. This increased diversity aims to improve judicial decision-making and public trust in the courts, impacting legal outcomes for decades to come.
Read More
A Texas federal judge blocked the Biden administration’s expansion of overtime pay protections, ruling the Labor Department overstepped its authority. This rule would have raised the salary threshold for overtime pay to $58,656, impacting an estimated 4 million more workers. The judge’s decision, halting the regulation nationwide, maintains the stricter existing rules. The Labor Department could appeal, but the incoming Trump administration will ultimately decide the rule’s fate. Employer groups opposed the rule due to increased labor costs.
Read More
A Texas federal judge blocked the Biden administration’s rule expanding overtime pay eligibility for millions of salaried workers. The judge sided with Texas and business groups who argued the Labor Department overstepped its authority by prioritizing employee wages over job duties in determining eligibility. The ruling reinstates the 2019 threshold of $35,568, reversing the planned increase to $43,888 and then $58,656. This decision mirrors a 2016 court ruling that struck down a similar Obama-era expansion.
Read More
I find myself wrapped up in the drama surrounding the oldest federal judge, a 97-year-old woman who is entangled in a battle with the bench trying to suspend her. The question that comes to mind is, why won’t she just retire gracefully? Age is not just a number, especially when it comes to making crucial judicial decisions. Imagine facing a legal battle where the judge overseeing your case was born in 1927. The sheer thought of that is unsettling.
The power that comes with holding such positions seems to have a grip on some individuals, preventing them from letting go. It’s a perplexing phenomenon that makes me question why certain individuals refuse to step down when they clearly should.… Continue reading
As allegations swirl around my involvement in undisclosed luxury trips paid for by the George Mason University Foundation, I cannot help but address the underlying issue at hand. The recent revelation that federal judges, including myself, failed to fully disclose free luxury travel to judicial conferences, as required by internal judiciary rules and federal ethics law, is alarming. The fact that numerous judges omitted such disclosures raises serious questions about the integrity and transparency of our judicial system.
It is disheartening to see the lack of accountability and transparency among colleagues within the legal profession. As a federal judge, it is imperative to uphold the highest ethical standards and maintain the public’s trust in the judiciary.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker