A federal judge issued a preliminary injunction ordering six federal agencies to immediately reinstate probationary employees fired as part of the Trump administration’s workforce reduction efforts. Judge Alsup deemed the firings a “sham,” finding that the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) unlawfully directed the agencies to terminate employees under the guise of performance issues, circumventing federal law. The judge rejected the Justice Department’s arguments, criticizing their lack of transparency and refusal to produce key testimony. This ruling is significant, impacting thousands of employees and challenging the administration’s authority to rapidly shrink the federal workforce. The White House has denounced the decision as “absurd and unconstitutional.”
Read More
A California federal judge ruled that the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) illegally ordered the firing of thousands of probationary federal employees, lacking the statutory authority to do so. The judge deemed OPM’s claim that the terminations were performance-based to be false and ordered the agency to rescind its directive. While the ruling prevents several specified agencies from conducting the OPM-ordered layoffs, it does not guarantee reinstatement for fired employees, nor does it halt all planned terminations. The judge’s decision was welcomed by labor unions as a crucial first step in protecting federal workers from what they described as baseless terminations driven by an anti-union agenda.
Read More
A federal judge ruled that the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) unlawfully ordered the mass firing of thousands of probationary federal employees, granting temporary relief to a coalition of labor unions and organizations. The judge determined OPM lacks the authority to dismiss employees outside its own agency, contradicting the government’s claim that it only requested agencies review probationary employees. While this doesn’t guarantee rehiring of those already dismissed, it prevents future firings based on the OPM’s directive and requires the acting head of OPM to testify. The judge emphasized the importance of probationary employees to government function, highlighting the potential disruption to services resulting from these firings.
Read More
A federal judge partially blocked President Trump’s executive order aiming to eliminate government diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs, deeming the order’s claims of illegality unfounded. The order, alleging DEI initiatives violate civil rights laws, sought to halt related awards and contracts. A coalition of academic institutions successfully challenged the order, arguing the resulting uncertainty harmed educators, students, and communities reliant on federal funding. Judge Adam B. Abelson’s ruling prevents the administration from terminating DEI-related obligations, emphasizing the decades-long legality of such programs. This decision provides relief to plaintiffs facing potential funding disruptions.
Read More
A federal judge recently denied a motion to block the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), Elon Musk’s cost-cutting team, from accessing sensitive Department of Labor (DOL) data, despite expressing reservations about DOGE’s actions. This decision has sparked outrage and concern, especially given allegations of potentially illegal data access and the lack of apparent repercussions for DOGE’s actions.
The judge’s ruling centered on the lack of established standing by the five federal employee unions that brought the lawsuit. While acknowledging concerns about DOGE’s alleged conduct, the judge determined that the unions hadn’t sufficiently demonstrated the necessary legal standing to pursue the motion at this time.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood