While in the United States, Andrew Tate’s electronic devices were seized by Customs and Border Protection. Subsequently, a White House official, Paul Ingrassia, intervened on the Tate brothers’ behalf by contacting senior Department of Homeland Security officials, requesting the devices be returned. Ingrassia’s actions caused concern among DHS officials, who worried about potential interference in a federal investigation. Law enforcement experts noted the unusual nature of such White House involvement, raising questions about potential intimidation and the politicization of law enforcement. The Tates deny any wrongdoing, and the status of any investigation into their devices remains unclear.
Read More
Following a ProPublica investigation, Senators Richard Blumenthal and Gary Peters have initiated an inquiry into a White House official’s intervention in a federal investigation involving Andrew and Tristan Tate. The official, Paul Ingrassia, formerly a legal representative for the Tates, allegedly contacted senior Department of Homeland Security officials to request the return of electronic devices seized from the brothers. Senators have requested a comprehensive account of Ingrassia’s actions from both the White House and DHS, expressing concerns about potential interference and impartiality within federal law enforcement. The Tates are currently facing sex trafficking accusations in multiple countries.
Read More
Following the seizure of Andrew Tate’s electronic devices by Customs and Border Protection officials, the White House intervened on his behalf, requesting their return. A White House official, Paul Ingrassia, who had previously represented the Tate brothers, contacted senior Department of Homeland Security officials, stating the seizure was a poor use of resources. This intervention raised concerns among DHS officials, with one calling the request an overreach and offensive to their duty to uphold the law. Legal experts have noted that such intervention by the White House is highly unusual and raises questions about impartiality and potential interference in a federal investigation.
Read More
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services is currently investigating organ donation practices following reports of potential misconduct within a Kentucky-based organization, Network for Hope, which merged with Kentucky Organ Donor Affiliates (KODA). Testimony before a House subcommittee revealed alleged instances where organs were harvested from individuals who may not have met the criteria for brain death. One specific case involves TJ Hoover, whose sister claims doctors attempted to harvest his organs while he exhibited signs of life, leading to the procedure’s halt. Former KODA employees have corroborated these accounts, raising serious concerns about the organization’s practices and prompting calls for reform in organ donation protocols.
Read More
A year after her death in a campus mass shooting, UNLV professor Patricia Navarro-Velez is posthumously named in a federal investigation targeting Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) programs at 45 colleges. The Department of Education alleges that UNLV’s involvement with The PhD Project, a mentoring program Navarro-Velez participated in, violates the 1964 Civil Rights Act through race-based eligibility restrictions. This action is part of the Trump administration’s broader effort to eliminate DEI initiatives from educational institutions. UNLV, citing ongoing investigation, offered limited comment, stating that two other former professors involved in the project are also under scrutiny.
Read More
Following a public confrontation between Maine Governor Janet Mills and President Trump over a ban on transgender athletes, the Department of Education launched a federal investigation into Maine’s compliance with Title IX. The investigation targets Maine’s policies allowing transgender students to participate in school sports, which the Department claims violates Title IX. Governor Mills denounced the investigation as political retaliation, emphasizing that the President cannot withhold legally appropriated federal funds to coerce compliance. Maine’s Attorney General vowed to fight the investigation in court, characterizing it as illegal and politically motivated.
Read More
Nine Nebraska state senators are demanding that Nebraska’s federal delegation oppose Elon Musk’s temporary role as a special government employee, citing concerns about ethical conflicts, inadequate oversight, and potential corruption. The senators highlight Musk’s extensive business interests and substantial political contributions as potential sources of undue influence within federal agencies. Their letter calls for investigations into potential legal and ethical violations stemming from Musk’s involvement with the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). This bipartisan effort seeks transparency and accountability regarding Musk’s access to classified information and financial systems.
Read More
The Justice Department’s first-ever review of the 1921 Tulsa Race Massacre concluded that, while federal prosecution might have been possible at the time, it is no longer legally feasible. The report details the massacre’s devastating impact, revealing the extent of the destruction and the roles played by various local authorities. Despite finding evidence of contemporary federal reports on the massacre, investigators found no record of federal prosecutors ever considering charges. The report’s findings, while unable to lead to criminal prosecution, establish a definitive record of the event, potentially paving the way for future discussions regarding reparations.
Read More
Readers are encouraged to submit news tips to The Daily Beast. The submission process is streamlined for ease of contribution. Tips can be sent through a dedicated online portal. All submissions are treated with confidentiality. Further instructions on how to submit tips are available at [link to submission portal, if applicable].
Read More
Following reports of Elon Musk’s extensive communications with Russian officials, including Vladimir Putin, Senators Jack Reed and Jeanne Shaheen have demanded a federal investigation. Their letter to the Attorney General and Defense Department Inspector General raises concerns about Musk’s reliability as a government contractor and security clearance holder, citing potential conflicts of interest and national security risks. The senators highlight Musk’s failure to report these contacts, contrasting his behavior with standard protocols for those with high-level security clearances. This call for investigation follows reports of Russian counter-space weapon development and alleged Kremlin propaganda efforts on Musk’s X platform.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker