Federal injunction

Judge Blocks Trump Administration’s Anti-Weaponization Fund

A federal judge has stepped in, issuing an injunction that effectively halts the establishment of a controversial $1.8 billion fund proposed by the administration. This fund, dubbed the “Anti-Weaponization Fund,” has faced significant scrutiny and opposition, and the judge’s decision stems from a notable lack of concrete commitment from senior officials to abandon the initiative.

The core of the issue, as highlighted by U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema, lies in the refusal of acting Attorney General Todd Blanche to provide a sworn statement, under penalty of perjury, that the fund would not proceed. This hesitation, coupled with President Donald Trump’s own expressed disappointment that the government might not move forward with the fund – particularly with an eye towards compensating individuals involved in the January 6th Capitol attack – has fueled the judge’s concerns.… Continue reading

Judge Blocks Trump’s Medical Research Funding Cuts

A federal judge issued a temporary injunction halting the National Institutes of Health’s (NIH) plan to drastically cut medical research grant funding, following a lawsuit from 22 states. This action, pending further legal arguments, temporarily prevents the implementation of a 15% cap on indirect costs—a significant reduction from the current average of 27-28%— impacting research institutions in the plaintiff states. The NIH claims the cuts, opposed by numerous research institutions and organizations, would save over $4 billion annually. The Senate’s upcoming confirmation vote on President Trump’s nominee to head the NIH may affect the policy’s future.

Read More