A federal judge in Boston has overturned the Trump administration’s decision to freeze nearly $2.2 billion in federal grants to Harvard University. The court order stated that the administration used antisemitism as a pretext for politically motivated actions, violating the Administrative Procedure Act, the First Amendment, and Title VI. The judge found that the administration failed to demonstrate a non-retaliatory basis for the grant terminations, which included demands related to university ideology and pedagogy. Despite the ruling, the White House and the Education Department expressed disagreement, maintaining Harvard’s ineligibility for future grants and criticizing the university’s handling of discrimination issues.
Read More
President Trump signed an executive order granting political appointees control over federal grant awards, potentially impacting billions of dollars. The order mandates agency officials review grants for alignment with priorities and allows for grant termination at any time. Critics argue this undermines the scientific process by injecting politics into funding decisions and delaying crucial research. The administration claims the changes will improve oversight, but experts predict legal challenges and significant disruptions to essential programs like emergency relief and public health initiatives.
Read More
The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) is offering a new grant for detentions, which appears to be a continuation of a previously terminated program. This funding opportunity comes as the Trump administration seeks state assistance with mass deportation policies, with states like Florida, under Governor Ron DeSantis, already establishing detention facilities. Critics have raised concerns about the conditions and environmental impact of these facilities, such as the one nicknamed “Alligator Alcatraz”, which is set to cost around $450 million to operate. This shift in FEMA’s focus comes alongside discussions of downsizing the agency and transferring its responsibilities to individual states.
Read More
President Trump threatened to revoke $3 billion in federal grants from Harvard University, diverting the funds to trade schools. This action escalates ongoing conflict stemming from the administration’s accusations of Harvard’s insufficient response to demands regarding student protests, diversity policies, and information disclosure about international students. Harvard has rejected these demands, citing constitutional concerns and filed lawsuits. Trump’s actions are part of his broader “rebuilding America” campaign message and focus on vocational education, while Harvard, possessing substantial financial resources, is prepared to contest these measures legally.
Read More
Secretary of Education Linda McMahon has rescinded all federal grants to Harvard University, citing numerous alleged violations of federal law and ethical breaches. McMahon’s letter details accusations ranging from non-compliance with the Supreme Court’s affirmative action ruling to criticisms of a new math course and alleged discrimination within the Harvard Law Review. The decision represents a significant escalation of the conflict between Harvard and the White House administration. McMahon argues that Harvard’s substantial endowment renders it capable of operating without federal funding.
Read More
The U.S. Department of Education, under the Trump administration, has revoked $1 billion in federal grants for school mental health programs, citing violations of civil rights law. These grants, part of the 2022 Bipartisan Safer Communities Act, funded the hiring of counselors and social workers in approximately 260 school districts nationwide. The department alleges that grant recipients implemented race-based actions, contradicting claims that the funding prioritized evidence-based mental health support. This decision jeopardizes the mental health services provided to students and the employment of newly hired professionals.
Read More
Judge AliKhan issued a temporary restraining order halting the planned freeze, effective immediately until February 3rd. This action, prompted by concerns of irreparable harm, comes just as the freeze was to commence. A hearing to further consider the matter is set for Monday. The order provides a brief reprieve before the issue is revisited.
Read More
Democrats are questioning the legality of a Trump-initiated freeze on federal grants, a move they see as a direct challenge to the fundamental principles of American governance. The core of their concern lies in the separation of powers enshrined in the Constitution. The power of the purse, the ability to control government spending, is explicitly granted to Congress. This isn’t a nuanced legal interpretation; it’s a foundational principle, a cornerstone of checks and balances designed to prevent executive overreach. Trump’s actions are perceived as a blatant attempt to seize this power, effectively transforming the presidency into a monarchy.
This isn’t simply a matter of disagreeing with a policy decision.… Continue reading
Acting OMB chief Matthew Vaeth’s memo directs a temporary pause on federal grants, loans, and other financial assistance programs to align spending with President Trump’s priorities. While Medicaid and Social Security are excluded, the impact on numerous other programs—including cancer research and food assistance—remains uncertain. This action, following a near-total halt to foreign aid, has drawn criticism for its potential devastating consequences and potential legal challenges concerning presidential authority over congressionally-apportioned funds. The memo specifically cites foreign aid, NGOs, DEI initiatives, and “woke” policies as targets for review.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood