US memo to colleges proposes terms on ideology, foreign enrollment for federal funds, and it’s causing quite a stir, as you might imagine. The whole thing smacks of… well, let’s just say a lot of folks aren’t thrilled. The core of the issue is a proposed set of terms that colleges would have to agree to in order to receive federal funding. These terms reportedly touch on two major areas: the ideological bent of the institutions and the number of foreign students they enroll.
Now, the idea of the government trying to influence the ideological leanings of universities… that’s where things start to get tricky.… Continue reading
Donald Trump threatened to cut off federal funding to New York City if Zohran Mamdani, the Democratic mayoral nominee, is elected, falsely labeling Mamdani a “communist.” Trump stated Mamdani would face “problems” and not receive funding, implying it would hinder his “FAKE Communist promises.” Despite Trump’s actions, the election is scheduled for November 4th, and the city relies on billions in federal funds for education, housing, and social services. The US Department of Education also threatened to strip the city of funding unless it ended transgender protections.
Read More
A federal judge ruled the Trump administration cannot deny funding to numerous cities and counties due to their policies limiting cooperation with federal immigration efforts. The ruling extends a preliminary injunction preventing the administration from withholding federal funds from “sanctuary” jurisdictions, deeming the administration’s actions an unconstitutional “coercive threat.” The judge also blocked the administration from imposing immigration-related conditions on specific grant programs. The ruling comes after the administration issued executive orders targeting these jurisdictions as part of its efforts to remove individuals in the country illegally and had published a list of “sanctuary jurisdictions”.
Read More
The Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB) announced it would begin winding down operations due to the elimination of its federal funding. This non-profit organization, which provides funding to public radio and television stations, PBS, and NPR, was targeted by the Trump administration and Congress, resulting in the termination of its funding. The CPB will conclude the majority of staff positions by the end of the fiscal year in September 2025 and a small transition team will remain through January 2026. The decision has raised concerns from NPR and PBS, which receive significant funding through the CPB, and could lead to layoffs, station closures, and reduced emergency alert capabilities, particularly in rural areas.
Read More
Columbia University has reached a $220 million settlement with the Trump administration over concerns of antisemitism on campus. The agreement, which includes a $200 million payment over three years and $21 million to settle related investigations, stems from the administration’s claims of the university’s failure to address antisemitism during the Israel-Hamas war. As part of the deal, Columbia will implement reforms, including changes to its curriculum and student disciplinary processes, while also agreeing to ensure its programs do not promote unlawful DEI goals. This settlement, reached after months of scrutiny, allows Columbia to restore federal funding and safeguard its independence.
Read More
In response to the Trump administration’s withholding of federal funds, primarily in blue states, Democratic legislators are proposing bills to allow states to withhold federal payments in return. These novel bills, introduced in multiple states, target instances where the federal government is deemed delinquent in its funding obligations. While these measures face legal challenges due to the supremacy clause, they represent state-level efforts to counter what is seen as an overreach by the Trump administration. Legal experts note that the financial imbalance between federal and state funding could limit the bills’ effectiveness and potentially lead to further retaliation. Despite these hurdles, some lawmakers see the bills as a necessary assertive response to the federal government’s actions.
Read More
In response to President Trump’s efforts to withhold federal funding, Democratic legislators in several states are introducing bills that would allow them to withhold state payments to the federal government. The proposed legislation, introduced in states like Connecticut, Maryland, New York, and Wisconsin, aims to counter the administration’s actions, which have frozen funds for various programs. While these bills face legal challenges and are unlikely to significantly impact the flow of funds, they represent a symbolic effort to challenge the federal government’s actions and protect state residents. Legal experts point out that the U.S. Constitution’s supremacy clause gives precedence to the federal government, but also recognize the potential for retaliation from the Trump administration.
Read More
Escalating tensions between California and the Trump administration have led to a potential conflict over tax funding. California Governor Newsom threatened to withhold the state’s substantial tax contributions to the federal government—approximately $83 billion more than it receives in return—in response to potential federal funding cuts to the state’s university system. Treasury Secretary Bessent countered, accusing Newsom of threatening criminal tax evasion and suggesting California adopt Trump-era tax cuts. This “donor state” dynamic highlights the significant financial disparity between states’ tax contributions and federal funding received.
Read More
Newsom’s suggestion to withhold federal taxes from the federal government is a bold response to Trump’s perceived threats against California. The governor highlighted the significant disparity between the amount California contributes to the federal tax pool and the amount it receives in return, emphasizing a substantial imbalance of approximately $83 billion in 2022. This imbalance underscores California’s financial contribution to the nation, fueling the governor’s consideration of withholding these substantial funds.
This proposed action stems from a growing sentiment amongst Californians who feel their state disproportionately funds other parts of the country. The idea is not merely retaliatory; it reflects a long-standing frustration with the perceived unfairness of the current system.… Continue reading
Donald Trump’s threat to withhold federal funding from California because a transgender student is participating in track and field highlights a disturbing trend: leveraging the well-being of an individual and an entire state for political gain. It’s a blatant attempt to use the power of the federal government to enforce a narrow, discriminatory agenda.
This isn’t a novel tactic. Similar attempts have been made elsewhere, only to fail in the face of legal challenges. The inherent weakness of such threats lies in the reality that executive orders aren’t legislation. They’re directives, and their ability to override established laws and state autonomy is limited.… Continue reading
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker