A letter containing extreme demands regarding Harvard’s policies on hiring, admissions, and curriculum, was mistakenly sent by a senior Trump administration official. The letter, though authentic in content, was reportedly sent prematurely or intended for internal use. Despite the administration now claiming the letter was an error, the demands remain, and Harvard’s federal funding has been frozen, prompting the university to publicly reject the terms. The administration has not rescinded its demands or reversed the funding freeze.
Read More
Congestion pricing in Manhattan has successfully reduced daily vehicle entries by an average of 82,000, a 13% decrease. This reduction, increasing monthly, is attributed to the $9 toll implemented to fund $15 billion in transit improvements. Despite this success, the program faces threats from the federal government, which seeks its termination by April 20 and threatens to withhold crucial federal funding. The MTA is contesting this order in court, with a decision expected no sooner than October.
Read More
The US Department of Education froze $2.3 billion in federal funds to Harvard University due to the university’s refusal to comply with White House demands. These demands, aimed at combating antisemitism and alleged civil rights violations, include dismantling diversity programs, implementing “merit-based” admissions, and cooperating with immigration authorities. Harvard’s president stated that the demands represent unwarranted government overreach into academic affairs and are a political ploy, prompting a lawsuit challenging the legality of the funding cuts. The dispute highlights a conflict between federal oversight and academic freedom at prestigious universities.
Read More
In response to a Trump administration review of nearly $9 billion in federal funding, Harvard University rejected proposed conditions demanding leadership changes, the cessation of diversity initiatives, and viewpoint diversity audits. These demands followed an investigation into alleged antisemitic incidents and followed the administration’s cancellation of $400 million in grants to Columbia University. Harvard President Alan Garber asserted the university would not compromise its independence or constitutional rights, emphasizing the crucial role of federal funding in vital research. The university’s rejection comes amidst a hiring freeze implemented due to financial uncertainties stemming from shifting federal policies.
Read More
Harvard professors are suing the Trump administration, alleging that a review of nearly $9 billion in federal funding is discriminatory and violates Title VI of the Civil Rights Act by suppressing free speech. This action follows a pattern of the administration targeting universities with pro-Palestine activism, including visa revocations and funding freezes. The lawsuit claims the funding review constitutes an unconstitutional attempt to coerce the university into silencing dissent and aligning with the administration’s political agenda. The professors seek a temporary restraining order to halt the review, arguing that it creates an untenable threat to the university’s operations.
Read More
Dallas County’s public health department has canceled over 50 vaccination clinics and laid off 21 employees due to $11.4 billion in nationwide federal funding cuts for pandemic response. These cuts, impacting millions in Dallas County’s budget, eliminate free measles, mumps, and rubella vaccines and critical staff for disease surveillance and prevention, leaving the county vulnerable despite the current outbreak being centered elsewhere in Texas. The cuts jeopardize ongoing public health initiatives beyond COVID-19 response, including measles prevention efforts. This decision comes as Texas grapples with 422 reported measles cases statewide, with outbreaks also affecting other states including Kansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, and Ohio.
Read More
The assertion that federal funding will be cut off from colleges and schools that permit what are deemed “illegal” protests is a significant development, raising several key questions. The immediate reaction is one of concern regarding the potential chilling effect this could have on free speech and the right to assembly, both constitutionally protected rights. This action seems to directly contradict the principles of a democratic society where open dissent and the voicing of concerns, even those deemed unpopular, are not only tolerated but are vital to a functioning government.
This proposed policy raises concerns about the definition of an “illegal” protest.… Continue reading
California’s Union Station became the unlikely stage for a dramatic showdown when Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy held a press conference regarding California’s high-speed rail project. Duffy’s criticism of the project, labeling it wasteful and unaccountable, and his announcement of a compliance review for federal funding ignited a furious response from the assembled crowd.
The event was far from a polite exchange of ideas. Instead, Duffy’s words were drowned out by a near-constant barrage of boos and chants, transforming the press conference into something resembling a hostile sporting event. Videos from the scene capture the intensity of the crowd’s disapproval, a palpable wave of discontent washing over the Secretary’s pronouncements.… Continue reading
Governor Josh Shapiro is suing the Trump administration for withholding over $2 billion in congressionally approved federal funding for Pennsylvania. This funding, crucial for water safety, utility assistance, and environmental cleanup, has been blocked despite court orders. The lawsuit alleges that the federal government’s actions violate the Constitution by unilaterally suspending allocated funds and imposing new conditions. These funds are vital for numerous projects, including abandoned mine reclamation and utility bill assistance for thousands of households, and their delay poses significant risks to public safety and infrastructure.
Read More
The White House’s sudden pause on all federal grants has sent shockwaves across the country, leaving many bewildered and deeply concerned. This unprecedented action, detailed in a two-page memo from the acting director of the Office of Management and Budget, instructs federal agencies to immediately halt all grant and loan disbursements. The sheer scope of this decision is staggering, affecting countless programs and individuals across numerous sectors.
The stated rationale behind the pause is to ensure compliance with President Trump’s executive orders targeting diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives, clean energy spending, and other areas deemed objectionable. While the memo explicitly states that Social Security and Medicare payments are unaffected, and that individual assistance programs remain active, the vast impact on a wide range of programs funded through federal grants is undeniable.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood