The National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) mistakenly fired several probationary employees on Thursday and is now attempting to reinstate them. The NNSA is struggling to contact these former employees because they no longer have access to their government email accounts. This incident highlights complications arising from the Trump administration’s rapid and widespread federal staff cuts, which have also impacted other departments such as Homeland Security. The firings, which primarily targeted probationary employees, have been met with significant legal and political challenges.
Read More
A federal judge temporarily halted the Office of Personnel Management’s (OPM) deadline for federal employees to accept a “deferred resignation” offer, preventing the implementation of the program’s February 6th deadline. The program, offering full pay and benefits until September 30th in exchange for resignation, was challenged by unions arguing it violated federal law and risked significant loss of government expertise. Approximately 40,000 employees had already accepted the offer, while the White House anticipated further uptake. The program’s legality is contested, with concerns raised by employment lawyers and state attorneys general regarding its clarity and authority.
Read More
Thousands of federal employees, including IRS workers, accepted a voluntary separation package with deferred resignation, expecting administrative leave starting March 1st. However, many IRS employees have been instructed to continue working until May 15th due to their positions being deemed “essential.” This contradicts the Office of Personnel Management’s (OPM) initial FAQ page, raising concerns about the reliability of the offer. The union representing these employees highlights the critical role of IRS workers during tax season and argues that the government’s actions demonstrate the essential nature of these jobs.
Read More
A website, “DEI Watch List,” published the personal information of federal health workers, primarily Black employees involved in diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives, labeling them as “targets.” The site, linked in private group chats and social media, lists alleged “offenses” such as political donations and pronoun usage in bios, sparking fear and alarm among employees. This action, attributed to the conservative American Accountability Foundation, is viewed as a form of intimidation and harassment, with calls for law enforcement investigation. The incident follows recent threatening memos from HHS directing the termination of DEI-related activities and the reporting of non-compliant colleagues, further escalating anxieties within federal health agencies.
Read More
The Trump administration, employing a plan reminiscent of Elon Musk’s actions at Twitter, is forcing federal employees, disproportionately veterans, to resign or face termination. This “deferred resignation” scheme, offering eight months’ pay in exchange for immediate resignation, is a coercive tactic disguised as a voluntary buyout. The plan, which targets agencies crucial to national security and veteran care, threatens to leave many veterans jobless and without recourse, while its purported cost savings are vastly inflated. This action is viewed not as efficiency reform, but as a politically motivated purge designed to weaken the civil service.
Read More
Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy’s proposal to mandate full-time, in-office work for federal employees, framed as a government efficiency measure, contrasts sharply with economic data. While some large companies have reduced remote work options, remote work remains prevalent, stabilizing at 25-30% of workdays since January 2023. Experts cite the significant profitability of hybrid work models for companies due to sustained productivity and reduced employee turnover costs. The proposed policy, therefore, may inadvertently serve as a cost-effective method of workforce reduction.
Read More
This article is protected by copyright © 2024 Fortune Media IP Limited. Use of this site is governed by its Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. The FORTUNE trademark is registered in the U.S. and other countries. Compensation may be received for certain links, and offers are subject to change.
Read More
Elon Musk’s recent X posts publicized the names and job titles of four relatively obscure climate-focused federal employees, sparking a wave of online harassment and forcing at least one to delete their social media accounts. This action, enabled by Musk’s massive following, has instilled fear among federal employees, who worry about becoming targets of online abuse and even physical threats. Experts suggest this tactic aims to intimidate employees into quitting, effectively downsizing the government without formal processes. A former federal employee, previously targeted by Musk, reported receiving death threats and being forced to relocate, highlighting the potential dangers of such public shaming.
Read More
Elon Musk, co-lead of the newly formed Department of Government Efficiency advisory group, is publicly targeting individual government employees on X, most recently highlighting Ashley Thomas’s role at the US International Development Finance Corporation. This has led to a significant online harassment campaign against Thomas, prompting concerns about the potential for such actions to instill fear among federal employees. Musk’s actions are consistent with past behavior of using social media to attack individuals, often under the pretext of free speech. This tactic has resulted in significant online harassment campaigns against his targets.
Read More
A top union leader warns that Donald Trump’s return to office will likely result in widespread harassment, intimidation, and corruption within the US federal government. This is fueled by Trump’s and his allies’ support for mass firings of civil servants and the abolishment of agencies, potentially utilizing the controversial Schedule F executive order to remove civil service protections from thousands of employees. This action would reverse over 150 years of merit-based hiring practices established by the Pendleton Act, undermining employee protections and increasing the risk of corruption. The anticipated implementation of Schedule F, central to the rightwing Project 2025 plan, threatens to significantly weaken unions and impair the government’s ability to function effectively.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker