Amidst the government shutdown, the CDC initially issued termination notices to around 1,300 employees, later rescinding over half of these firings, as reported by several news outlets. The reinstated employees included members of the Epidemic Intelligence Service and those involved in the Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, according to The New York Times. Officials attributed the errors to “incorrect notifications” or a “coding error,” although the precise number of employees recalled remains unconfirmed. These actions have drawn criticism, with some labeling them as an assault on public health and highlighting the ongoing turmoil within the agency, including a recent lawsuit filed by the American Federation of Government Employees against the firings and recent events regarding previous CDC leadership and actions.
Read More
The Trump administration is scrambling to rehire thousands of federal employees dismissed during a previous staff-slashing initiative, reversing course on firings at numerous agencies including the FDA and IRS. This chaotic rehiring process, driven by a combination of court orders and administrative reversals, is complicated by many employees’ reluctance to return or having already secured new positions. The administration is employing various stopgap measures, including reassignments and overtime requests from existing staff, to address critical staffing shortages across multiple agencies. This personnel upheaval is causing significant stress and impacting essential services, particularly at agencies like the National Weather Service and the Department of Housing and Urban Development. The situation highlights the significant disruption caused by the initial firings and the administration’s subsequent efforts to mitigate the damage.
Read More
Jennifer Piggott, a self-described “MAGA junkie,” regrets her votes for Donald Trump after losing her federal job as part of the Trump administration’s downsizing efforts. Piggott, along with at least 24,000 other probationary federal employees, was fired, with a federal judge ruling many of the firings illegal. Despite receiving high performance reviews, Piggott and others report unexpected economic devastation resulting from these actions. While the White House defends the firings as part of a mandate to increase government efficiency, Piggott and others express disillusionment with the administration’s methods.
Read More
Judge Alsup denied the Trump administration’s request to stay his order reinstating thousands of unlawfully fired probationary federal employees. The judge cited the increasing difficulty of reinstatement with each passing day and the government’s attempts to obstruct the legal process. Alsup deemed the administration’s mass firings a sham, designed to circumvent statutory requirements, and rejected the DOJ’s arguments regarding administrative burdens and speculative harm claims. He emphasized that OPM cannot direct agencies to fire employees under the guise of guidance, and the administration’s refusal to provide testimony further demonstrated its obstructive tactics. The DOJ intends to appeal the ruling to the Ninth Circuit.
Read More
Nineteen states are suing the Trump administration, alleging that over 20 federal agencies improperly fired thousands of probationary employees under the guise of performance issues. The lawsuit claims these agencies violated federal law by failing to provide the mandated 60-day advance notice of mass layoffs, hindering states’ ability to provide crucial job transition services. The states argue the agencies used reductions in force to shrink their headcount without following proper procedures. The plaintiffs seek a temporary restraining order to halt further firings and reinstate those already terminated. A hearing on the matter is set for March 12th.
Read More
A federal judge’s ruling deemed the Office of Personnel Management’s (OPM) mass firing of probationary federal employees unlawful, citing a lack of statutory authority. This decision prompted several agencies to reinstate critical personnel, including specialists in areas like avian flu and nuclear weapons. Despite this partial reversal, the threat of broader, “large-scale” federal job cuts remains. The situation highlights the ongoing instability and uncertainty faced by federal workers.
Read More
A federal judge ruled that the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) unlawfully ordered the mass firing of thousands of probationary federal employees, granting temporary relief to a coalition of labor unions and organizations. The judge determined OPM lacks the authority to dismiss employees outside its own agency, contradicting the government’s claim that it only requested agencies review probationary employees. While this doesn’t guarantee rehiring of those already dismissed, it prevents future firings based on the OPM’s directive and requires the acting head of OPM to testify. The judge emphasized the importance of probationary employees to government function, highlighting the potential disruption to services resulting from these firings.
Read More
The Office of Special Counsel (OSC) ruled that the mass firings of probationary federal employees were likely illegal, citing violations of laws governing probationary terminations and reductions in force. The decision, concerning six workers but impacting potentially 200,000, found that the dismissals lacked individualized cause and circumvented proper reduction-in-force procedures. OSC head Hampton Dellinger requested stays on the six firings and is exploring broader remedies. This action directly challenges President Trump and Elon Musk’s efforts to drastically shrink the federal workforce. The ruling is a significant setback for their administration’s personnel policies.
Read More
In its first month, the Trump administration deported approximately 37,660 individuals, a figure lower than the Biden administration’s monthly average but significantly fewer than the approximately 200,000 federal employees potentially affected by job cuts. These job cuts, facing legal challenges, include accidental dismissals of crucial personnel in areas like nuclear security and avian flu prevention. The administration also facilitated approximately 75,000 buyouts. Future plans include escalating deportation efforts and continued cost-cutting measures within the federal government.
Read More
Thousands of federal employees, including numerous scientists, have been terminated in a recent wave of firings targeting probationary workers. This drastic reduction of the federal workforce, impacting agencies from the CDC to the National Park Service, has sparked widespread concern about public health, environmental protection, and the safety of essential programs. The terminations, characterized as a rapid and sweeping action unprecedented in recent history, have halted projects, created staffing shortages and jeopardized crucial scientific research and public services. The firings have led to a significant loss of expertise across various fields and raised serious questions about the long-term consequences of these actions.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker