A federal judge ordered the U.S. government to return Kilmar Abrego Garcia to the United States by Monday. ICE admitted to wrongfully deporting Garcia to El Salvador due to an administrative error, despite possessing a lawful order preventing his removal to that country. The government conceded it lacked documentation justifying the deportation, leading the judge to deem the action illegal. Garcia’s family and supporters celebrated the ruling, though the government’s intent to comply remains unclear.
Read More
A Massachusetts federal judge issued a temporary injunction preventing the deportation of a detained Tufts University graduate student. This follows the student’s arrest by immigration officials and subsequent calls from several lawmakers for her release. The injunction halts deportation proceedings while the legal challenge unfolds. The student remains detained pending further legal action.
Read More
A federal judge issued a temporary restraining order blocking President Trump’s executive order banning federal funding for gender-affirming care for transgender youth under 19. The judge ruled the order unconstitutional, citing violations of the Fifth and Tenth Amendments, and argued it unfairly discriminates against transgender individuals while impacting unrelated medical treatments. The order prevents the federal government from enforcing key aspects of the executive order, allowing transgender youth to continue accessing necessary medical care. This decision followed a lawsuit filed by several states and medical professionals challenging the legality and discriminatory nature of the executive order.
Read More
A Rhode Island federal judge issued a temporary restraining order halting the Trump administration’s federal spending freeze, following a lawsuit from 22 states and the District of Columbia. This ruling, separate from a prior injunction, addresses the administration’s continued efforts to pause funding despite rescinding the initial OMB memo. The judge’s decision cites post-rescission statements by the White House reaffirming the freeze’s intent. The order prevents the suspension of federal funds to the plaintiff states and the District of Columbia, barring actions outside of established legal processes. The administration contends the ruling is an unconstitutional attack on presidential executive orders.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker