The Department of Government Efficiency (Doge), established by executive order, has reportedly been dissolved, ending its mission of reforming federal agencies and reducing the workforce, despite its contract extending until July 2026. While officials, including Elon Musk, claimed the department aimed for transparency, it faced criticism for a lack of public accounting and questionable spending cuts. Following internal turmoil, including the departure of key figures and a reported feud, Doge’s responsibilities have been absorbed by other federal offices, as evidenced by a move within the OPM. Key personnel, including the acting administrator, have transitioned to other government roles, including a shift to launching websites.
Read More
Watchdog group files Hatch Act complaint over federal agencies blaming Democrats for shutdown.
Here’s the situation: a watchdog group has filed a Hatch Act complaint because they believe federal agencies are unfairly blaming Democrats for the government shutdown. It seems like a familiar tune, doesn’t it? The Hatch Act is meant to keep federal employees from playing partisan politics. The general consensus is that the Hatch Act is a law that’s difficult to enforce, especially when those in power are the ones who would need to enforce it. There’s a real frustration here, a sense of the rules not mattering.
The process for dealing with Hatch Act violations involves a few different organizations, all under the president’s control.… Continue reading
President Trump announced he would meet with OMB Director Russ Vought to discuss potential cuts to federal agencies, aiming to leverage the government shutdown. Trump’s post on Truth Social indicated the meeting would determine which “Democrat Agencies” should be cut, and whether those cuts would be temporary or permanent. This comes as the government entered its first shutdown since 2019 due to a funding dispute over the Affordable Care Act subsidies. Vought, a key figure behind the conservative “Project 2025” plan, which outlines overhauls to the federal government, will be instrumental in advising Trump on these decisions.
Read More
The Supreme Court’s decision to curtail the independence of federal agencies fundamentally alters the balance of power, granting the executive branch significantly more control. This empowers President Trump to prioritize political aims over expertise and reasoned policy, creating long-term damage to the stability and effectiveness of government institutions. Simultaneously, various legal battles are unfolding, with some courts blocking Trump administration actions like mass layoffs and the silencing of Voice of America, while others permit them to continue. The ongoing challenges to the administration’s actions highlight the deep political divisions and the increasingly fraught relationship between the branches of government.
Read More
A US judge has recently ruled that the Trump administration cannot unilaterally restructure and downsize federal agencies without the express consent of Congress. This decision, handed down in a San Francisco court, stems from lawsuits filed by unions, nonprofits, and municipalities who argued that the administration’s mass layoffs were unlawful and would severely harm the public.
The judge agreed, stating that agencies cannot disregard congressional mandates, regardless of presidential orders. This highlights a crucial aspect of the US system of checks and balances: the executive branch, while possessing significant power, is not above the law and cannot arbitrarily circumvent the legislative branch’s authority over government spending and structure.… Continue reading
President Trump’s administration is undertaking a sweeping restructuring of numerous federal agencies and programs, many with histories spanning decades or even centuries. This includes attempts to privatize or significantly alter institutions like the US Postal Service and the Internal Revenue Service, as well as challenging established legal precedents regarding citizenship and environmental regulations. The proposed changes encompass significant cuts to funding for research, international aid, and social programs, often met with legal challenges and opposition from various stakeholders. Furthermore, the administration is pursuing policies that significantly shift the focus and function of agencies like the Department of Justice Civil Rights Division and the Environmental Protection Agency.
Read More
Representative Stansbury publicly demanded that Elon Musk testify regarding his access and data extraction from numerous federal agencies. This follows Musk’s team’s unprecedented access to sensitive data from agencies including the CDC, Medicare/Medicaid, and the FAA—the latter coinciding with a surge in fatal aviation accidents. The extracted data encompasses the personal information of hundreds of millions of Americans. Democrats expressed outrage at the scope of Musk’s actions and the potential implications for national security and privacy.
Read More
Supreme Court Hears Key Case That Could Strangle Power of US Federal Agencies
The Supreme Court is currently holding hearings on a case that could have far-reaching implications for the power of US federal agencies. The case challenges the Chevron Deference, a legal doctrine that grants agencies the authority to interpret and implement laws passed by Congress. If the Supreme Court decides to undermine or eliminate this doctrine, it could significantly limit the power of federal agencies and potentially put the interests of the American people at risk.
As I delved into the comments on this news article, I couldn’t help but notice the strong and diverse opinions surrounding this case.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood